Linux-ARM-MSM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] remoteproc: Traverse rproc_list under RCU read lock
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:41:00 +0100
Message-ID: <87a14705-186d-01a4-e8a5-1844dab4ea14@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200310063817.3344712-2-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Hi Bjorn,


On 3/10/20 7:38 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> In order to be able to traverse the mostly read-only rproc_list without
> locking during panic migrate traversal to be done under rcu_read_lock().
> 
> Mutual exclusion for modifications of the list continues to be handled
> by the rproc_list_mutex and a synchronization point is added before
> releasing objects that are popped from the list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> ---
> 
> Change v3:
> - New patch
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 097f33e4f1f3..f0a77c30c6b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1854,8 +1854,8 @@ struct rproc *rproc_get_by_phandle(phandle phandle)
>  	if (!np)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
> -	list_for_each_entry(r, &rproc_list, node) {
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(r, &rproc_list, node) {
>  		if (r->dev.parent && r->dev.parent->of_node == np) {
>  			/* prevent underlying implementation from being removed */
>  			if (!try_module_get(r->dev.parent->driver->owner)) {
> @@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_get_by_phandle(phandle phandle)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&rproc_list_mutex);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>  
>  	of_node_put(np);
>  
> @@ -1925,7 +1925,7 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	/* expose to rproc_get_by_phandle users */
>  	mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
> -	list_add(&rproc->node, &rproc_list);
> +	list_add_rcu(&rproc->node, &rproc_list);
>  	mutex_unlock(&rproc_list_mutex);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -2140,9 +2140,12 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	/* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */
>  	mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
> -	list_del(&rproc->node);
> +	list_del_rcu(&rproc->node);
>  	mutex_unlock(&rproc_list_mutex);
i'm not familiar with rcu but as rproc_panic_handler can be called in interrupt context, 
does mutex should be replaced by a spinlock?

Regards,
Arnaud
>  
> +	/* Ensure that no readers of rproc_list are still active */
> +	synchronize_rcu();
> +
>  	device_del(&rproc->dev);
>  
>  	return 0;
> 

  reply index

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-10  6:38 [PATCH v4 0/4] remoteproc: Panic handling Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-10  6:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] remoteproc: Traverse rproc_list under RCU read lock Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-10 13:41   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2020-03-10 16:20     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-23 21:52   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-10  6:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] remoteproc: Introduce "panic" callback in ops Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-23 22:29   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-23 22:33   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-10  6:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5: Add common panic handler Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-23 22:36   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-10  6:38 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] remoteproc: qcom: Introduce panic handler for PAS and ADSP Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-23 22:45   ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a14705-186d-01a4-e8a5-1844dab4ea14@st.com \
    --to=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ARM-MSM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/0 linux-arm-msm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-arm-msm linux-arm-msm/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm \
		linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-arm-msm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git