From: Kalle Valo <email@example.com> To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Bhaumik Bhatt <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] ath11k: set register access length for MHI driver Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:02:38 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210521135152.GL70095@thinkpad> (Manivannan Sadhasivam's message of "Fri, 21 May 2021 19:21:52 +0530") Manivannan Sadhasivam <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 12:51:43PM -0700, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote: >> MHI driver requires register space length to add range checks and >> prevent memory region accesses outside of that for MMIO space. >> Set it before registering the MHI controller. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <email@example.com> >> Reviewed-by: Hemant Kumar <firstname.lastname@example.org> > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <email@example.com> > > Kalle, should we do immutable branch for this patch or I can pick it up via MHI > tree (if there are no other patches expected from ath11k for this controller)? I'm not expecting any conflicts with this, and if there are, they should be easy for Stephen or Linus to fix. So it's easiest to route this via your tree. But I'm not giving my ack yet, see below. I'm worried that this patchset breaks bisect. Every patch in the patchset should not break existing functionality, what if only patches 1-3 are included in the tree but not patch 4? Wouldn't ath11k be broken then? I didn't review the whole patchset, but I suspect the fix is to include the ath11k change in the actual mhi patch which changes the functionality. So that way we would not have a separate ath11k patch at all. Also I'm not able to test this patchset at the moment. Can someone else help and do a quick test with QCA6390 to verify these doesn't break ath11k? -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-14 16:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-06 19:51 [PATCH v4 0/6] BHI/BHIe improvements for MHI power purposes Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] bus: mhi: core: Set BHI/BHIe offsets on power up preparation Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-21 13:36 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] bus: mhi: core: Set BHI and BHIe pointers to NULL in clean-up Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-21 13:37 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] bus: mhi: Add MMIO region length to controller structure Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-21 13:38 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] ath11k: set register access length for MHI driver Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-21 13:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-06-14 16:02 ` Kalle Valo [this message] 2021-06-14 17:49 ` Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-06-16 17:38 ` Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-06-18 6:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-06-23 17:29 ` Kalle Valo 2021-06-24 6:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-06-23 17:34 ` Kalle Valo 2021-06-23 21:33 ` Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] bus: mhi: pci_generic: Set " Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-21 13:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-05-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] bus: mhi: core: Add range checks for BHI and BHIe Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-07 2:33 ` Hemant Kumar 2021-05-21 13:54 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2021-06-25 5:28 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] BHI/BHIe improvements for MHI power purposes Manivannan Sadhasivam -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2021-05-06 19:32 Bhaumik Bhatt 2021-05-06 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] ath11k: set register access length for MHI driver Bhaumik Bhatt
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] ath11k: set register access length for MHI driver' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).