From: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca> To: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Jordan Crouse <jordan@cosmicpenguin.net>, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>, Sharat Masetty <smasetty@codeaurora.org>, Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>, "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/msm/a6xx: add support for Adreno 660 GPU Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:53:44 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <8dd37a7b-b58f-3cf6-346e-ca5add2a163c@marek.ca> (raw) In-Reply-To: <055b924e-43fe-1b2b-7292-43a88f9798c2@codeaurora.org> On 5/31/21 11:05 AM, Akhil P Oommen wrote: > On 5/13/2021 10:44 PM, Jonathan Marek wrote: ... >> @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static void a6xx_gmu_rpmh_init(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu) >> if (!pdcptr) >> goto err; >> - if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) >> + if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a660(adreno_gpu)) > > why not adreno_is_a650_family() here? > Based on downstream, a620 is part of a650_family but does not have pdc_in_aop flag. >> @@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, >> unsigned int state) >> int ret; >> u32 chipid; > We need to program this register here: > gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_CX_GMU_CX_FALNEXT_INTF, 1); > msm-4.19 does not have this write for a650, but msm-5.4 then adds it. Will make it a separate change since it affects a650 and not just a660. >> - if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) >> + if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a660(adreno_gpu)) >> gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_CX_GMU_CX_FAL_INTF, 1); >> if (state == GMU_WARM_BOOT) { >> @@ -1494,12 +1494,28 @@ int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, >> struct device_node *node) >> if (ret) >> goto err_put_device; >> + >> + /* A660 now requires handling "prealloc requests" in GMU firmware >> + * For now just hardcode allocations based on the known firmware. >> + * note: there is no indication that these correspond to "dummy" or >> + * "debug" regions, but this "guess" allows reusing these BOs which >> + * are otherwise unused by a660. >> + */ >> + gmu->dummy.size = SZ_4K; >> + if (adreno_is_a660(adreno_gpu)) { >> + ret = a6xx_gmu_memory_alloc(gmu, &gmu->debug, SZ_4K * 7, >> 0x60400000); >> + if (ret) >> + goto err_memory; > > I think we can simply ignore this allocation for a660 because it was > required for an unused feature. Do you see any issue if you ignore this > allocation? > Yes, without it there will be an error: arm-smmu 3da0000.iommu: Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x402, iova=0x60400000, fsynr=0x32, cbfrsynra=0x5, cb=2 >> + >> + gmu->dummy.size = SZ_8K; >> + } >> + >> /* Allocate memory for the GMU dummy page */ >> - ret = a6xx_gmu_memory_alloc(gmu, &gmu->dummy, SZ_4K, 0x60000000); >> + ret = a6xx_gmu_memory_alloc(gmu, &gmu->dummy, gmu->dummy.size, >> 0x60000000); >> if (ret) >> goto err_memory; >> - if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) { >> + if (adreno_is_a650_family(adreno_gpu)) { >> ret = a6xx_gmu_memory_alloc(gmu, &gmu->icache, >> SZ_16M - SZ_16K, 0x04000); >> if (ret) >> @@ -885,6 +937,13 @@ static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) >> /* Protect registers from the CP */ >> a6xx_set_cp_protect(gpu); >> + if (adreno_is_a660(adreno_gpu)) { >> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_CHICKEN_DBG, 0x1); >> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_CLIENT_QOS_CNTL, 0x0); >> + /* Set dualQ + disable afull for A660 GPU but not for A635 */ >> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_UCHE_CMDQ_CONFIG, 0x66906); >> + } >> + > gpu_rmw(gpu, REG_A6XX_PC_DBG_ECO_CNTL, 0, (1 << 9)); > We need this for a640, a650 and a660. > Will make this a separate patch too, since it affects non-a660 GPUs too. >> /* Enable expanded apriv for targets that support it */ >> if (gpu->hw_apriv) { >> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_APRIV_CNTL, >> +/* check for a650, a660, or any derivatives */ >> +static inline int adreno_is_a650_family(struct adreno_gpu *gpu) >> +{ >> + return gpu->revn == 650 || gpu->revn == 620 || >> + gpu->revn == 660 || gpu->revn == 635; > We can remove 635 references throughout since that is not a valid adreno > chipid anymore. > > -Akhil I will remove it for my patch (it can discussed when adding 635 support, but I think you will need to have a 6xx ID for the GPU) >> +} >> + >> int adreno_get_param(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint32_t param, uint64_t >> *value); >> const struct firmware *adreno_request_fw(struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu, >> const char *fwname); >>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 16:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-13 17:13 [PATCH v2 0/8] " Jonathan Marek 2021-05-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/msm: remove unused icc_path/ocmem_icc_path Jonathan Marek 2021-05-31 7:26 ` Akhil P Oommen 2021-05-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/msm/a6xx: use AOP-initialized PDC for a650 Jonathan Marek 2021-05-31 7:24 ` Akhil P Oommen 2021-06-08 15:54 ` Jonathan Marek 2021-05-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/msm/a6xx: fix incorrectly set uavflagprd_inv field for A650 Jonathan Marek 2021-05-31 7:33 ` Akhil P Oommen 2021-05-13 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/msm/a6xx: update/fix CP_PROTECT initialization Jonathan Marek 2021-05-31 8:09 ` Akhil P Oommen 2021-05-13 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/msm/a6xx: avoid shadow NULL reference in failure path Jonathan Marek 2021-05-31 9:25 ` Akhil P Oommen 2021-05-13 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/msm/a6xx: add support for Adreno 660 GPU Jonathan Marek 2021-05-31 15:05 ` Akhil P Oommen 2021-06-08 16:53 ` Jonathan Marek [this message] 2021-05-13 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/msm/a6xx: update a6xx_ucode_check_version for a660 Jonathan Marek 2021-05-31 15:06 ` Akhil P Oommen 2021-05-13 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/msm/a6xx: add a660 hwcg table Jonathan Marek 2021-05-31 15:10 ` Akhil P Oommen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=8dd37a7b-b58f-3cf6-346e-ca5add2a163c@marek.ca \ --to=jonathan@marek.ca \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=akhilpo@codeaurora.org \ --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org \ --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \ --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=dianders@chromium.org \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=eric@anholt.net \ --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=jordan@cosmicpenguin.net \ --cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lkp@intel.com \ --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \ --cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \ --cc=sean@poorly.run \ --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \ --cc=smasetty@codeaurora.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/msm/a6xx: add support for Adreno 660 GPU' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).