From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
agross@kernel.org, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Павел <be.dissent@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: Add ipq6018 SoC and CP01 board support
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 20:12:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96fd8992-e333-6b3b-15c0-2845984120aa@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1981742.H2rzviYcjI@debian64>
Hi Christian,
On 6/15/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:48:48 AM CEST Sricharan R wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> On 6/10/2019 5:45 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:09:56 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote:
>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>
>>>> On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and
>>>>>> CP01 evaluation board.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org>
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + clocks {
>>>>>> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk {
>>>>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>>>>> + clock-frequency = <32000>;
>>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>> Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk
>>>>> on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML.
>>>>> From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK
>>>>> declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and
>>>>> datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for
>>>>> the IPQ6018.
>>>>> (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What exactly is the issue that you faced ?
>>>> Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well.
>>>
>>> We need just a confirmation.
>>>
>>> Then again, Currently the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is using 32768 Hz.
>>>
>>> | sleep_clk: sleep_clk {
>>> | compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> | clock-frequency = <32768>;
>>> | #clock-cells = <0>;
>>> | };
>>>
>>> <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi#L144>
>>>
>>> Which makes sense, because all previous Qualcomm Atheros MIPS and the
>>> future IPQ8072 SoCs have been either using or deriving a 32768 Hz clock.
>>>
>>> For example: The AR9344 derives the clock from the 25MHz/40MHz external
>>> oscillator. This is explained in "8.16.9 Derived RTC Clock (DERIVED_RTC_CLK)".
>>> Which mentions that the "32KHz" clock interval is 30.5 usec / 30.48 usec
>>> depending whenever the external reference crystal has 40MHz or 25MHz.
>>> (1/30.5usec = 32.7868852 kilohertz!). The QCA9558 datasheet says the same
>>> in "10.19.11 Derived RTC Clock".
>>>
>>> For IPQ8072: I point to the post by Sven Eckelmann on the OpenWrt ML:
>>> <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2019-May/017131.html>
>>> "I was only able to verify for IPQ8072 that it had a 32.768 KHz
>>> sleep clock."
>>>
>>> So this is pretty much "why there is an issue", it's confusing.
>>> Is possible can you please look if there are (fixed) divisors values
>>> listed in the documentation or the registers and bits that the values
>>> are stored in? Because then we could just calculate it.
>>>
>>
>> Really sorry for the confusion. So looking little more, SLEEP_CLK is derived
>> from an external 38.4MHZ crystal, it is 32.768 KHZ.
> That's really valuable information to have. Thank you!
>
>> Somehow the clk freq plan etc seems to mention them only as .032 MHZ and misses
>> out. That means i will correct the patch for 32768 and probably the
>> ipq8074.dtsi as well
>
> Ok, there's one more issue that Paul found (at least with the IPQ4019),
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1099482
>
> it seems that the "sleep_clk" node in the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is not used by
> the gcc-ipq4019.c clk driver. this causes both wifi rtc_clks and the usb sleep
> clks to dangle in the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary (from a RT-AC58U)
>
> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> xo 9 9 48000000 0 0
> [...]
> sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0
> gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0
> gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0
> gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0
> gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0
>
> with his patch the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary looks "better"
>
> (something like this:)
>
> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> xo 9 9 48000000 0 0
> [...]
> gcc_sleep_clk_src 5 5 32000 0 0
> gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0
> gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0
> gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0
> gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0
>
> but judging from your comment "SLEEP_CLK is derived from an
> external 38.4MHZ crystal" the gcc_sleep_clk_src / sleep_clk
> should have xo as the parent. so the ideal output should be:
>
> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> xo 10 10 48000000 0 0
> [...]
> gcc_sleep_clk 5 5 32768 0 0
> gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0
> gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0
> gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0
> gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0
>
> or am I missing/skipping over something important?
>
Sorry for the delayed response. So what i said above (32768 clk) looks
like true only for ipq8074. For ipq4019, looks like 32000.
That means, there is still some thing unclear. I am checking for precise
information from HW team for ipq4019/8074/6018. Please hang on, will
update you asap.
Regards,
Sricharan
--
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-19 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-05 17:15 [PATCH 0/6] Add minimal boot support for IPQ6018 Sricharan R
2019-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] pinctrl: qcom: Add ipq6018 pinctrl driver Sricharan R
2019-06-08 3:26 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-06-10 11:00 ` Sricharan R
2019-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: qcom: Add ipq6018 bindings Sricharan R
2019-06-08 3:27 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-06-10 11:01 ` Sricharan R
2019-06-19 14:54 ` Rob Herring
2019-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH 3/6] clk: qcom: Add DT bindings for ipq6018 gcc clock controller Sricharan R
2019-06-08 3:33 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-06-05 17:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: Add ipq6018 SoC and CP01 board support Sricharan R
2019-06-05 17:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-08 2:44 ` Sricharan R
2019-06-05 20:41 ` Christian Lamparter
2019-06-10 10:09 ` Sricharan R
2019-06-10 12:15 ` Christian Lamparter
2019-06-12 9:48 ` Sricharan R
2019-06-14 20:41 ` Christian Lamparter
2019-06-19 14:42 ` Sricharan R [this message]
2019-06-20 15:32 ` Christian Lamparter
2019-06-24 12:08 ` Sricharan R
2019-06-08 3:48 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-06-10 15:45 ` Sricharan R
2019-06-10 16:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-06-05 17:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: defconfig: Enable qcom ipq6018 clock and pinctrl Sricharan R
2019-06-08 3:32 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-06-05 17:26 ` [PATCH 0/6] Add minimal boot support for IPQ6018 Sricharan R
2019-06-07 23:08 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <1559754961-26783-5-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-08 3:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] clk: qcom: Add ipq6018 Global Clock Controller support Bjorn Andersson
2019-06-10 11:47 ` Sricharan R
2019-06-10 16:58 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-06-05 17:28 [PATCH 0/6] Add minimal boot support for IPQ6018 Sricharan R
2019-06-05 17:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: Add ipq6018 SoC and CP01 board support Sricharan R
2019-06-05 17:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-06-08 2:44 ` Sricharan R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=96fd8992-e333-6b3b-15c0-2845984120aa@codeaurora.org \
--to=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=be.dissent@gmail.com \
--cc=chunkeey@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).