From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: Fix rollback during error-out in
 takedown_cpu()
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:30:41 +0530
Message-ID: <9b4609c6-284f-cfab-82ba-2f2bf7f1867a@codeaurora.org>
References: <1536042803-6152-1-git-send-email-neeraju@codeaurora.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809051244500.1416@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809051419580.1416@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <5b0e528f-e597-9598-3ff6-b9e08ddb8165@codeaurora.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809051514070.1416@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <9cac90ff-1a43-8663-da2e-7191975b5e93@codeaurora.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809061016500.1416@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809061016500.1416@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dzickus@redhat.com, brendan.jackman@arm.com, malat@debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sramana@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org



On 09/06/2018 01:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>> On 09/05/2018 06:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>>>> On 09/05/2018 05:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>>> And looking closer this is a general issue. Just that the TEARDOWN state
>>>>> makes it simple to observe. It's universaly broken, when the first
>>>>> teardown
>>>>> callback fails because, st->state is only decremented _AFTER_ the
>>>>> callback
>>>>> returns success, but undo_cpu_down() increments unconditionally.
>>>>>
>>>> As per my understanding, there are 2 problems here; one is fixed with your
>>>> patch, and other is cpuhp_reset_state() is used during rollback from
>>>> non-AP to
>>>> AP state, which seem to result in 2 increments of st->state (one increment
>>>> done by cpuhp_reset_state() and another by cpu_thread_fun()) .
>>> And how did your hack fix that up magically? I'll have a look later today.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> 	tglx
>>
>> The hack fixes it by not calling cpuhp_reset_state() and doing rollback state
>> reset inline in  _cpu_down().
> 
> And how is that any different from the proper patch I sent? It ends up in
> the same state. So I have a hard time to understand your blurb above where
> you claim that my patch just solves one of two problems?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
>

Yes, your patch solves the problem related to smpboot unparking being 
skipped during rollback and with the hack we end up in same state. The 
second thing, which I am referring to, is that there is one additional 
state increment. I missed the part that, it could be required, so that 
we reach CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE before calling __cpuhp_kick_ap(). So, it's 
not a problem.

* 	cpuhp_reset_state() does one state increment and we reach 
CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE.

	if (ret && st->state > CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU && st->state < prev_state) {
		cpuhp_reset_state(st, prev_state);
		__cpuhp_kick_ap(st);
	}

         CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU,
         CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE,
         CPUHP_AP_SMPBOOT_THREADS,


* cpuhp_thread_fun() does one more increment before invoking state 
callback (so, we skip CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE) and we reach 
CPUHP_AP_SMPBOOT_THREADS:

	static void cpuhp_thread_fun(unsigned int cpu)
	<snip>
		if (bringup) {
			st->state++;
			state = st->state;
	<snip>


-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation