From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F66C4743D for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 21:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0676461406 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 21:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230264AbhFDVpb (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 17:45:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58876 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229755AbhFDVpb (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 17:45:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87644C061767 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 14:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 66-20020a9d02c80000b02903615edf7c1aso10425947otl.13 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 14:43:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:user-agent:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=UC2AwnCU4W7/DsYhuag8+yME3EH1r1RYHCOePL8HnE8=; b=gyixkUsX9X9cshP0+/da03kfPP1vDkY6E+1CRSM3XENnvzCQrcmZ+wqIEzNlyNmaih ulPMGWPfDkJzeTXMaFS8bZ23mWyGshXPpC6gJSuWjNybEjXUI1uffRVFUUoa3kC054Pn 1p0cBrLoSxt/nH9tKKefz5YGdOtpD+kTmZU38= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :user-agent:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UC2AwnCU4W7/DsYhuag8+yME3EH1r1RYHCOePL8HnE8=; b=WyY3Nge4f0hX2S83Sv+nd5BjQV9xqaE3M4P2xgmyvox3nI4Nq6x0Hs2hY8dWqEDmc2 BR1X+iCxZkbLDA00PPa/XkJchmn6X5ZKuI3WbKzf+2PraBrBdX3rvoJfEXqncZNiRY71 b7KtvcdGLSp7rv9210Q+vCxCVMajVfqd2VZ/dfTuvbBVbOFA1kYJ1EU8OHHhFXoiU3Ao GqXiVNovHbURYlX3RKlNYWIPeoffbgvGalt8dNCOveoAOE3/04/NryeozMnotXw2GyUT G4L1FSX+vfvFlj/D77ESY728VyuZXqoFVly2GSgfATqGVyWq4mBFI7Lj98zXYdSxsB12 85cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kpYuLdRMKnMD0sMo4DKceNaqoaYm0WIPw+S63UiSGM98GPbMN UD3Ck7XYYOK6tRRpdiS8bh66PczXLynegnblf3veVQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwr2se1dNVn8fcmj+5C9VlOmdmIbF+cFdeprjZMsb0eOG/2oJZICzO8EqVw3ExXz/X0loWOlYLVrM+akoFuZxk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3154:: with SMTP id c20mr5415860ots.233.1622843023585; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 14:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 21:43:43 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3b3701bb1e23dec88f2231722872fc40@codeaurora.org> References: <1620382648-17395-1-git-send-email-pmaliset@codeaurora.org> <1620382648-17395-3-git-send-email-pmaliset@codeaurora.org> <3b3701bb1e23dec88f2231722872fc40@codeaurora.org> From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 21:43:43 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PCIe and PHY related nodes To: Prasad Malisetty Cc: Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, mgautam@codeaurora.org, dianders@chromium.org, mka@chromium.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Quoting Prasad Malisetty (2021-05-21 02:57:00) > On 2021-05-08 01:36, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Prasad Malisetty (2021-05-07 03:17:27) > >> Add PCIe controller and PHY nodes for sc7280 SOC. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Prasad Malisetty > >> --- > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 138 > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 138 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > >> index 2cc4785..a9f25fc1 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi > >> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > >> #include > >> #include > >> #include > >> +#include > >> > >> / { > >> interrupt-parent = <&intc>; > >> @@ -316,6 +317,118 @@ > >> }; > >> }; > >> > > [...] > >> + > >> + pcie1_phy: phy@1c0e000 { > >> + compatible = > >> "qcom,sm8250-qmp-gen3x2-pcie-phy"; > >> + reg = <0 0x01c0e000 0 0x1c0>; > >> + #address-cells = <2>; > >> + #size-cells = <2>; > >> + ranges; > >> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_AUX_CLK>, > >> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_CFG_AHB_CLK>, > >> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_CLKREF_EN>, > >> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_PHY_RCHNG_CLK>; > >> + clock-names = "aux", "cfg_ahb", "ref", > >> "refgen"; > >> + > >> + resets = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_PHY_BCR>; > >> + reset-names = "phy"; > >> + > >> + assigned-clocks = <&gcc > >> GCC_PCIE1_PHY_RCHNG_CLK>; > >> + assigned-clock-rates = <100000000>; > >> + > >> + status = "disabled"; > > > > I think the style is to put status disabled close to the compatible? > > Generally I have added status disabled in end as like many nodes. just > curious to ask is there any specific reason to put close to compatible. It's really up to qcom maintainers, which I am not. > >> + }; > >> + > >> + reset-n { > >> + pins = "gpio2"; > >> + function = "gpio"; > >> + > >> + drive-strength = <16>; > >> + output-low; > >> + bias-disable; > >> + }; > >> + > >> + wake-n { > >> + pins = "gpio3"; > >> + function = "gpio"; > >> + > >> + drive-strength = <2>; > >> + bias-pull-up; > >> + }; > > > > These last two nodes with the pull-up and drive-strength settings > > should > > be in the board files, like the idp one, instead of here in the SoC > > file. That way board designers can take the SoC and connect the pcie to > > an external device using these pins and set the configuration they want > > on these pins, or choose not to connect them to the SoC at all and use > > those pins for something else. > > > > In addition, it looks like the reset could be a reset-gpios property > > instead of an output-low config. > > > we are using reset property as perst gpio in pcie node. Ok, perst-gpios should be fine. Presumably perst-gpios should be in the board and not in the SoC because of what I wrote up above.