From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C29C4332F for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 01:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238863AbhLOB24 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:28:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43792 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238832AbhLOB2z (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:28:55 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x335.google.com (mail-ot1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::335]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A017EC061401 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:28:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x335.google.com with SMTP id u18-20020a9d7212000000b00560cb1dc10bso22966981otj.11 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:28:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:user-agent:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=vsh1MhG90sktMnN9grpR54l4uKx6Z6N5tsDDxbZW6o0=; b=JGU0cApMNO/QObrJvFbIIED25d0QAjNji23cp4HxXLFGTpEnaeb2d947VuokTPrJh4 GxqIDaSVHw/ZVrgLLUJ36p6hc4fc2Ao3NBWHZY9233yxuiRmSq0+VA+k2c7w+AK1ethh pIXA/919loix9H/jY9SRtqVmU7bJ5WRstSyhE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :user-agent:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vsh1MhG90sktMnN9grpR54l4uKx6Z6N5tsDDxbZW6o0=; b=cG/yXUbOpzk707LkyxbvoUetIP5ueu9pUFvxWkTXcQQtH7wC34AQgtR+o+icGOgX+4 Wj70Sj24UeG3SDO8n9mP+XD24xxggKx7nSLX1om/FS2dMOe6u6NorLqgp2FRlS99X/oc qFu4ZJt0siw2uF55t1j21weWQVm79/iCWPNgYqFl03vydkBdgpM7q3vlNGVPtWZDz63J snyDg756tpipD62Dlro3hVsKgFC0Cea4El28PGEt4PgGDsy3yMnBeKlHc7z1qpN4ACeT YuKsxn+pXbcScufxO8aWJIgoKtwepk6i/QAUT+6uli5r1eh/VuDhRlv+2kdG3RbzwVzm 3gxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531M66lQPcxvl2BfLGgOvsR2kY9fuzV3fLS21lanJlIebJAHb7Lz jYN0qRZLfeN0dyU5mJUS2UGlCAm2d/cWuAbXmW3iqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVvIEVSzGWkZ6r6tum5sN5c25e8CxEhW4XCE5QW3Fp24XzJo9z3AmfNkACncaxRnmD6mxorka5IqffVKX3Lug= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:70ce:: with SMTP id w14mr6875613otj.77.1639531734897; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:28:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:28:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1638891339-21806-1-git-send-email-quic_srivasam@quicinc.com> References: <1638891339-21806-1-git-send-email-quic_srivasam@quicinc.com> From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:28:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add pin control support for lpass sc7280 To: Linus Walleij , Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu , agross@kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, bgoswami@codeaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, judyhsiao@chromium.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, plai@codeaurora.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, rohitkr@codeaurora.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, tiwai@suse.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-12-07 07:35:34) > This patch series is to split lpass variant common pin control > functions and SoC specific functions and to add lpass sc7280 pincontrol support. > It also Adds dt-bindings for lpass sc7280 lpass lpi pincontrol. What ensures that the LPI pins are being muxed out on the pads of the SoC? There's the eGPIO support in the tlmm driver, which seems to let us override the LPI pins and mux them away from this pinctrl device to the tlmm pinctrl device. Should this driver be requesting gpios from tlmm and making sure they're not muxed away to tlmm so we don't have conflicts?