From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
To: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>,
freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
Sharat Masetty <smasetty@codeaurora.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: fix for kernels without CONFIG_NVMEM
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:11:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGsWCrkOgMVxnx53k8b_o7xy3KWv9VaNRoY44+4GfXtWdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4b62857-bd4d-cca6-0d6b-b9cc960b52a2@codeaurora.org>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 4:28 AM Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/18/2021 2:05 AM, Jonathan Marek wrote:
> > On 2/17/21 3:18 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:08 AM Jordan Crouse
> >> <jcrouse@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 07:14:16PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> >>>> On 2/17/2021 8:36 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ignore nvmem_cell_get() EOPNOTSUPP error in the same way as a
> >>>>>> ENOENT error,
> >>>>>> to fix the case where the kernel was compiled without CONFIG_NVMEM.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fixes: fe7952c629da ("drm/msm: Add speed-bin support to a618 gpu")
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 6 +++---
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> >>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> >>>>>> index ba8e9d3cf0fe..7fe5d97606aa 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> >>>>>> @@ -1356,10 +1356,10 @@ static int a6xx_set_supported_hw(struct
> >>>>>> device *dev, struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> cell = nvmem_cell_get(dev, "speed_bin");
> >>>>>> /*
> >>>>>> - * -ENOENT means that the platform doesn't support
> >>>>>> speedbin which is
> >>>>>> - * fine
> >>>>>> + * -ENOENT means no speed bin in device tree,
> >>>>>> + * -EOPNOTSUPP means kernel was built without CONFIG_NVMEM
> >>>>>
> >>>>> very minor nit, it would be nice to at least preserve the gist of the
> >>>>> "which is fine" (ie. some variation of "this is an optional thing and
> >>>>> things won't catch fire without it" ;-))
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (which is, I believe, is true, hopefully Akhil could confirm.. if not
> >>>>> we should have a harder dependency on CONFIG_NVMEM..)
> >>>> IIRC, if the gpu opp table in the DT uses the 'opp-supported-hw'
> >>>> property,
> >>>> we will see some error during boot up if we don't call
> >>>> dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(). So calling "nvmem_cell_get(dev,
> >>>> "speed_bin")"
> >>>> is a way to test this.
> >>>>
> >>>> If there is no other harm, we can put a hard dependency on
> >>>> CONFIG_NVMEM.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure if we want to go this far given the squishiness about
> >>> module
> >>> dependencies. As far as I know we are the only driver that uses this
> >>> seriously
> >>> on QCOM SoCs and this is only needed for certain targets. I don't
> >>> know if we
> >>> want to force every target to build NVMEM and QFPROM on our behalf.
> >>> But maybe
> >>> I'm just saying that because Kconfig dependencies tend to break my
> >>> brain (and
> >>> then Arnd has to send a patch to fix it).
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hmm, good point.. looks like CONFIG_NVMEM itself doesn't have any
> >> other dependencies, so I suppose it wouldn't be the end of the world
> >> to select that.. but I guess we don't want to require QFPROM
> >>
> >> I guess at the end of the day, what is the failure mode if you have a
> >> speed-bin device, but your kernel config misses QFPROM (and possibly
> >> NVMEM)? If the result is just not having the highest clk rate(s)
>
> Atleast on sc7180's gpu, using an unsupported FMAX breaks gmu. It won't
> be very obvious what went wrong when this happens!
Ugg, ok..
I suppose we could select NVMEM, but not QFPROM, and then the case
where QFPROM is not enabled on platforms that have the speed-bin field
in DT will fail gracefully and all other platforms would continue on
happily?
BR,
-R
>
> >> available, that isn't the end of the world. But if it makes things
> >> not-work, that is sub-optimal. Generally, especially on ARM, kconfig
> >> seems to be way harder than it should be to build a kernel that works,
> >> if we could somehow not add to that problem (for both people with a6xx
> >> and older gens) that would be nice ;-)
> >>
> >
> > There is a "imply" kconfig option which solves exactly this problem.
> > (you would "imply NVMEM" instead of "select NVMEM". then it would be
> > possible to disable NVMEM but it would get enabled by default)
> >
> >> BR,
> >> -R
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-16 20:09 [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: fix for kernels without CONFIG_NVMEM Jonathan Marek
2021-02-17 3:06 ` Rob Clark
2021-02-17 13:44 ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-02-17 19:08 ` Jordan Crouse
2021-02-17 20:18 ` Rob Clark
2021-02-17 20:35 ` Jonathan Marek
2021-02-18 12:28 ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-02-18 16:11 ` Rob Clark [this message]
2021-02-19 10:44 ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-02-19 16:00 ` Rob Clark
2021-02-22 15:45 ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-02-22 16:06 ` Rob Clark
2021-04-01 20:12 ` Rob Clark
2021-04-01 21:03 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-04-01 21:49 ` Rob Clark
2021-04-03 4:39 ` Akhil P Oommen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAF6AEGsWCrkOgMVxnx53k8b_o7xy3KWv9VaNRoY44+4GfXtWdg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akhilpo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=smasetty@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).