From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EBEC433EF for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 19:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346682AbiEKTMl (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2022 15:12:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57514 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345686AbiEKTMk (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2022 15:12:40 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E13E77F38 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 12:12:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id g23so3614181edy.13 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 12:12:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=m0rLYZTGM9tABUfYW7kAK/fqq3Ax7YNevFHH/XCjFGs=; b=eCbRkCpG+1uv8o7qRy4S8ofMtbzrfrNObimViXJYOfvi54JNTAr6JFhhlnpgtpAcS+ VN1OH3CnIDFz9Ap8QJJbmVusIA88+j05i4dmbpolhuHRtJjOf6pV7NrV6W8AIKtloJuO Epo1XPPLAfd3d4t/rIpKYoMleVpcQa62xi+gI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=m0rLYZTGM9tABUfYW7kAK/fqq3Ax7YNevFHH/XCjFGs=; b=LnBA14Azdmfg9KRbxX+hcTYkKOfMoJKk4UblfZQwJjtIaS3VMiyx+57k7HqCUQWzbV ViH9ws/AHCQHgvpNn0pBB9EXRj/6IpECG7L5LO8TZoyztRWqUjE645HzNJV4ezWznPrV gbDefEEo3m9D2s3cLy5kRB3dJWqhfsUm6r2Hl2oi/tEzOpJrxTeWNJT/CijD2ZvPaIzL pYmAc2Tuuhs/QLukN1J6CrSnKjkzZGJAIgIljFoy23QzorhRK504nItMynw+QIb1JNUk P3XRg1wDYEeGb0Ky9f7QJZ8xPihyot6BVf6hXcrNa7Bquch0oe+pz3B9qsi6j9OsmPcA lHCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hvqkzHt2RgpJDlCPzyFpVdh0s9qGDpDjEM/zlPjqxAeEMog+i lp64+Wt+8wuSyjTUI2V5r02oC+oxjg+Zumlc8SY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfJekXwKPQ8d58XJMzlXXduToQ9wOqy19e8fvf1kC4HOexIIPvnH2W4n29/Y3X+Ty3tIvu+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a50:9ecc:0:b0:428:73bd:4667 with SMTP id a70-20020a509ecc000000b0042873bd4667mr26852475edf.165.1652296355905; Wed, 11 May 2022 12:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (mail-wr1-f49.google.com. [209.85.221.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9-20020aa7c149000000b0042617ba63a8sm1493892edp.50.2022.05.11.12.12.34 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 May 2022 12:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id t6so4304017wra.4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 12:12:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6dad:0:b0:20c:4dc1:e247 with SMTP id u13-20020a5d6dad000000b0020c4dc1e247mr24044515wrs.274.1652296354621; Wed, 11 May 2022 12:12:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220510070140.45407-1-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <20220510141329.54414-1-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 12:12:18 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding CI results to the kernel tree was Re: [RFC v2] drm/msm: Add initial ci/ subdirectory To: Rob Clark Cc: Dave Airlie , Tomeu Vizoso , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Daniel Vetter , Jonathan Corbet , Sean Paul , Abhinav Kumar , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , linux-arm-msm , LKML , dri-devel , freedreno Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The kernel tree might have just the expected *failures* listed, if > there are any. Presumably the ci tree has to have the expected results > anyway, so what's the advantage of listing non-failures? .. put another way: I think a list of "we are aware that these currently fail" is quite reasonable for a development tree, maybe even with a comment in the commit that created them about why they currently fail. That also ends up being very nice if you fix a problem, and the fix commit might then remove the failure for the list, and that all makes perfect sense. But having just the raw output of "these are the expected CI results" that is being done and specified by some other tree entirely - that seems pointless and just noise to me. There's no actual reason to have that kind of noise - and update that kind of noise - that I really see. Linus