From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/15] dt: psci: Update DT bindings to support hierarchical PSCI states
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:53:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+cAKEGOMnBwwvLt03zx8Gcxh4ijziaBnnY5TPEG0Mekg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191230144402.30195-3-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 8:44 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Update PSCI DT bindings to allow to represent idle states for CPUs and the
> CPU topology, by using a hierarchical layout. Primarily this is done by
> re-using the existing DT bindings for PM domains [1] and for PM domain idle
> states [2].
>
> Let's also add an example into the document for the PSCI DT bindings, to
> clearly show the new hierarchical based layout. The currently supported
> flattened layout, is already described in the ARM idle states bindings [3],
> so let's leave that as is.
>
> [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> [2] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/domain-idle-state.txt
> [3] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt
>
> Co-developed-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v5:
> - None.
First I'm seeing this as the DT list was not copied. The example has
problems when running 'make dt_binding_check':
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.example.dt.yaml: cpu@0:
compatible: Additional items are not allowed ('arm,armv8' was
unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.example.dt.yaml: cpu@0:
compatible: ['arm,cortex-a53', 'arm,armv8'] is too long
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.example.dt.yaml: cpu@1:
compatible: Additional items are not allowed ('arm,armv8' was
unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.example.dt.yaml: cpu@1:
compatible: ['arm,cortex-a57', 'arm,armv8'] is too long
'arm,armv8' is only valid for s/w models.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.example.dt.yaml:
idle-states: cluster-retention:compatible:0: 'arm,idle-state' was
expected
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.example.dt.yaml:
idle-states: cluster-power-down:compatible:0: 'arm,idle-state' was
expected
The last 2 are due to my conversion of the idle-states binding which
is in my tree now. Probably need to add 'domain-idle-state' as a
compatible at a minimum. It looks like domain-idle-state.txt is pretty
much the same as arm/idle-state.txt, so we should perhaps merge them.
There's some bigger issues though.
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml | 15 +++
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml | 104 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml
> index c23c24ff7575..7a9c3ce2dbef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml
> @@ -242,6 +242,21 @@ properties:
>
> where voltage is in V, frequency is in MHz.
>
> + power-domains:
> + $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array'
> + description:
> + List of phandles and PM domain specifiers, as defined by bindings of the
> + PM domain provider (see also ../power_domain.txt).
> +
> + power-domain-names:
> + $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array'
> + description:
> + A list of power domain name strings sorted in the same order as the
> + power-domains property.
> +
> + For PSCI based platforms, the name corresponding to the index of the PSCI
> + PM domain provider, must be "psci".
> +
> qcom,saw:
> $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle'
> description: |
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml
> index 7abdf58b335e..8ef85420b2ab 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml
> @@ -102,6 +102,34 @@ properties:
> [1] Kernel documentation - ARM idle states bindings
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt
>
> + "#power-domain-cells":
This is wrong because you are saying the /psci node should have these
properties. You need to define the child nodes (at least a pattern you
can match on) and put these properties there.
> + description:
> + The number of cells in a PM domain specifier as per binding in [3].
> + Must be 0 as to represent a single PM domain.
> +
> + ARM systems can have multiple cores, sometimes in an hierarchical
> + arrangement. This often, but not always, maps directly to the processor
> + power topology of the system. Individual nodes in a topology have their
> + own specific power states and can be better represented hierarchically.
> +
> + For these cases, the definitions of the idle states for the CPUs and the
> + CPU topology, must conform to the binding in [3]. The idle states
> + themselves must conform to the binding in [4] and must specify the
> + arm,psci-suspend-param property.
> +
> + It should also be noted that, in PSCI firmware v1.0 the OS-Initiated
> + (OSI) CPU suspend mode is introduced. Using a hierarchical representation
> + helps to implement support for OSI mode and OS implementations may choose
> + to mandate it.
> +
> + [3] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> + [4] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/domain-idle-state.txt
> +
> + power-domains:
> + $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array'
> + description:
> + List of phandles and PM domain specifiers, as defined by bindings of the
> + PM domain provider.
A schema for 'domain-idle-states' property is missing.
>
> required:
> - compatible
> @@ -160,4 +188,80 @@ examples:
> cpu_on = <0x95c10002>;
> cpu_off = <0x95c10001>;
> };
> +
> + - |+
> +
> + // Case 4: CPUs and CPU idle states described using the hierarchical model.
> +
> + cpus {
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> +
> + CPU0: cpu@0 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> + reg = <0x0>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + power-domains = <&CPU_PD0>;
> + power-domain-names = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + CPU1: cpu@1 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8";
> + reg = <0x100>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + power-domains = <&CPU_PD1>;
> + power-domain-names = "psci";
> + };
> +
> + idle-states {
> +
> + CPU_PWRDN: cpu-power-down {
> + compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x0000001>;
> + entry-latency-us = <10>;
> + exit-latency-us = <10>;
> + min-residency-us = <100>;
> + };
> +
> + CLUSTER_RET: cluster-retention {
> + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x1000011>;
> + entry-latency-us = <500>;
> + exit-latency-us = <500>;
> + min-residency-us = <2000>;
> + };
> +
> + CLUSTER_PWRDN: cluster-power-down {
> + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x1000031>;
> + entry-latency-us = <2000>;
> + exit-latency-us = <2000>;
> + min-residency-us = <6000>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + psci {
> + compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
> + method = "smc";
> +
> + CPU_PD0: cpu-pd0 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&CPU_PWRDN>;
> + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> + };
> +
> + CPU_PD1: cpu-pd1 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&CPU_PWRDN>;
> + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> + };
> +
> + CLUSTER_PD: cluster-pd {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_RET>, <&CLUSTER_PWRDN>;
> + };
> + };
> ...
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-13 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-30 14:43 [PATCH v5 00/15] cpuidle: psci: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] cpuidle: psci: Align psci_power_state count with idle state count Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] dt: psci: Update DT bindings to support hierarchical PSCI states Ulf Hansson
2020-01-13 19:53 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2020-01-14 17:54 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-01-16 18:19 ` Rob Herring
2020-01-17 16:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-01-17 17:36 ` Rob Herring
2020-01-20 12:56 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-01-21 16:59 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-24 21:07 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-25 8:49 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] firmware: psci: Export functions to manage the OSI mode Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] of: base: Add of_get_cpu_state_node() to get idle states for a CPU node Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] cpuidle: dt: Support hierarchical CPU idle states Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] cpuidle: psci: Simplify OF parsing of CPU idle state nodes Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] cpuidle: psci: Support hierarchical CPU idle states Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] cpuidle: psci: Add a helper to attach a CPU to its PM domain Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] cpuidle: psci: Attach CPU devices to their PM domains Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] cpuidle: psci: Prepare to use OS initiated suspend mode via " Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 16:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-31 10:31 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] cpuidle: psci: Manage runtime PM in the idle path Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] cpuidle: psci: Support CPU hotplug for the hierarchical model Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] PM / Domains: Introduce a genpd OF helper that removes a subdomain Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 16:38 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-31 10:32 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-30 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] arm64: dts: Convert to the hierarchical CPU topology layout for MSM8916 Ulf Hansson
2019-12-31 10:37 ` [PATCH v5 00/15] cpuidle: psci: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement Ulf Hansson
2019-12-31 10:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-31 10:57 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAL_Jsq+cAKEGOMnBwwvLt03zx8Gcxh4ijziaBnnY5TPEG0Mekg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).