From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F6DC17441 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 23:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C10420865 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 23:46:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573256780; bh=DVj4e+5dUvj9CfxICEqKu/slf5ah4O7Xbig8CEBOmbA=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=HYQy1q+0Togx1JB0CJL5P4fMphB3z1kVFa7ki01SuU5IqKR/Eza8+xlErQQ6/fkCw 56JYszlAZzgIWvKzqZCcxuUrwwTJwikaJSjsL6WOWdv/r5Hwy/XoTPGWrp5oSdrjWg 3sjhcRAjCFtPuJYVOPf0/jVAnSXZMAVLCcG35s4E= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730481AbfKHXqU (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 18:46:20 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44414 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726640AbfKHXqT (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 18:46:19 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f47.google.com (mail-qv1-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3CB52178F; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 23:46:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573256778; bh=DVj4e+5dUvj9CfxICEqKu/slf5ah4O7Xbig8CEBOmbA=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=2Q08bsrwaIq1CxO+JYAxaR0HUa1jeyfp5ofNTHcm+BRf6M0SaPGm9MLqCgX8L/zg7 k6LruowSA87rOvg93jts7y6yRTyYov/GR2hmgCxVhvcGodHBjXjbxcd1poMHZnG5Ip zvpJxMCBbqxeaym7O2RcZ7uxqJ0l9Bp+/oIEp4Ys= Received: by mail-qv1-f47.google.com with SMTP id cg2so2903043qvb.10; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:46:18 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXMrZQKQ2Jm+6+cMQuAI+93YTu/7a6xD+tlVD3wRqtVQs5LZhFX dbrFUEYSfhBHj1DMydR12ANqjrp/6nocAlZPgA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxK4HOtNnah0NRINiwTwCR12VgWOScEENJQK+B+kNIZk+sXgNhwk2CFPqmGQZ4pNC4OirtSwuoSGI2+NgYHZ+Q= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:43e9:: with SMTP id f9mr12596446qvu.66.1573256777935; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:46:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191106065017.22144-1-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <20191106065017.22144-9-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <20191106165632.GA15103@bogus> <3302bde7-2299-476e-e3cc-35c84a459d63@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <3302bde7-2299-476e-e3cc-35c84a459d63@codeaurora.org> From: Rob Herring Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 17:46:06 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/14] dt-bindings: qcom,pdc: Add compatible for sc7180 To: Rajendra Nayak Cc: Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , linux-arm-msm , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Matthias Kaehlcke , Stephen Boyd , Lina Iyer , Marc Zyngier Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:46 PM Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > > On 11/6/2019 10:26 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:20:11 +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >> Add the compatible string for sc7180 SoC from Qualcomm. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak > >> Cc: Lina Iyer > >> Cc: Marc Zyngier > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,pdc.txt | 3 ++- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > > > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, > > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream > > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. > > > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. > > Sorry I missed mentioning the delta and the reason for not including your Acked-by. > The previous patch was proposing using just a SoC specific compatible, and this > one adds a SoC independent one along with the SoC specific one as discussed here [1] Okay. Reviewed-by: Rob Herring