From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75057C5DF60 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB3C218AE for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Dik/qDtZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728847AbfKGRkl (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:40:41 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-f195.google.com ([209.85.166.195]:43192 "EHLO mail-il1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727132AbfKGRkl (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:40:41 -0500 Received: by mail-il1-f195.google.com with SMTP id r9so2557450ilq.10; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:40:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yOo0PDlDopuEcfVjLmbeQrHkAsp6K2BWDtJG0uxJS8o=; b=Dik/qDtZvYOqAPnaXltVe5lMrg/AJQuBQ5jkmaEa5UAW6OKXLXxniHZt2cbfEPmbZe UxE7ocz1UAkvlITt5B4ivXVR8GUeb+CfpRb2Ix23jJw9C/XJpo1dj3YC5bNi4zzCpFbt QTqKlhZ6xGiqZlCav+TlabSn0DwHdOlB55ERXe3hAJNsnvgR7bOK/XG8D6eg/wqXU+Sg Bnsu9drtxFEfEHer3O4ASZReuaEVFDaUFmDXSiorCEHnFR1MY5pkXIFTucToWqTjx2l/ /hU/KDhN6x1CRm2sUfvDBmzTEpC6hVezf/jJ6cd121F9zn4cT9E20jTuPbfXOTlN32CQ i4yA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yOo0PDlDopuEcfVjLmbeQrHkAsp6K2BWDtJG0uxJS8o=; b=aCJdCAo38Wnmd/HZ6LmejgGxIMRs3QHuKpk2t++xjtcjbXqiS3YwH598Od7BWEtnt1 5msOe/QiJoBhagEEaXH7slnA2PQTc+AvkU+hyiZthzPPVezvbwJFLpl+jUR6Ppc0ehDa WhvPydR9bbszdJ7izlt17twSF0LvgZpIloofDHcxx4bhIhsgWDFMZBmHOt7dyciPfo+I Zy4kqOohpvQch3uO827sJr+ODE0wCF3Z1QwsszipIzGEIakVDq+0GGrme9O1fa92ynpC Tbd2Ict/vvdyjFa6aeIUP1rAiMiXnM8qHScTFfPISrN+ASEKfyXIKlug6uxL+0QcQpmn +ptg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXFabXl98Rd8EWcK6AGIRi+0v4Ra1bAjnCFEOtSaybweYXPt6Sv Lg2e5GREO0NdTwHgB0OEw0tbGMtGIM6bKNfe+8c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqykagGCSdu1ecPWSK+7WUrDmTy8tNUSaESVTaqLyccAdN0CMpfzsRbj+/KQR7pNFVXjELh3Yio7zN2bGhWgw7w= X-Received: by 2002:a92:831d:: with SMTP id f29mr6048008ild.263.1573148440248; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:40:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191105000129.GA6536@onstation.org> <20191105100804.GA9492@onstation.org> <20191106091335.GA16729@onstation.org> <20191107111019.GA24028@onstation.org> In-Reply-To: From: Jeffrey Hugo Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:40:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Freedreno] drm/msm: 'pp done time out' errors after async commit changes To: Rob Clark Cc: Brian Masney , Rob Clark , freedreno , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel , linux-arm-msm , Sean Paul Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:17 AM Rob Clark wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:10 AM Brian Masney wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 08:58:59AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:47 AM Jeffrey Hugo wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:30 AM Rob Clark wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:13 AM Brian Masney wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:23:27AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:08 AM Brian Masney wrote: > > > > > > > > The 'pp done time out' errors go away if I revert the following three > > > > > > > > commits: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cd6d923167b1 ("drm/msm/dpu: async commit support") > > > > > > > > d934a712c5e6 ("drm/msm: add atomic traces") > > > > > > > > 2d99ced787e3 ("drm/msm: async commit support") > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I reverted the first one to fix a compiler error, and the second one so > > > > > > > > that the last patch can be reverted without any merge conflicts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see that crtc_flush() calls mdp5_ctl_commit(). I tried to use > > > > > > > > crtc_flush_all() in mdp5_flush_commit() and the contents of the frame > > > > > > > > buffer dance around the screen like its out of sync. I renamed > > > > > > > > crtc_flush_all() to mdp5_crtc_flush_all() and removed the static > > > > > > > > declaration. Here's the relevant part of what I tried: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c > > > > > > > > @@ -171,7 +171,15 @@ static void mdp5_prepare_commit(struct msm_kms *kms, struct drm_atomic_state *st > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > static void mdp5_flush_commit(struct msm_kms *kms, unsigned crtc_mask) > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > - /* TODO */ > > > > > > > > + struct mdp5_kms *mdp5_kms = to_mdp5_kms(to_mdp_kms(kms)); > > > > > > > > + struct drm_crtc *crtc; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + for_each_crtc_mask(mdp5_kms->dev, crtc, crtc_mask) { > > > > > > > > + if (!crtc->state->active) > > > > > > > > + continue; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + mdp5_crtc_flush_all(crtc); > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any tips would be appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this is along the lines of what we need to enable async commit > > > > > > > for mdp5 (but also removing the flush from the atomic-commit path).. > > > > > > > the principle behind the async commit is to do all the atomic state > > > > > > > commit normally, but defer writing the flush bits. This way, if you > > > > > > > get another async update before the next vblank, you just apply it > > > > > > > immediately instead of waiting for vblank. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I guess you are on a command mode panel, if I remember? Which is > > > > > > > a case I didn't have a way to test. And I'm not entirely about how > > > > > > > kms_funcs->vsync_time() should be implemented for cmd mode panels. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, this is a command-mode panel and there's no hardware frame counter > > > > > > available. The key to getting the display working on this phone was this > > > > > > patch: > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2bab52af6fe68c43b327a57e5ce5fc10eefdfadf > > > > > > > > > > > > > That all said, I think we should first fix what is broken, before > > > > > > > worrying about extending async commit support to mdp5.. which > > > > > > > shouldn't hit the async==true path, due to not implementing > > > > > > > kms_funcs->vsync_time(). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What I think is going on is that, in the cmd mode case, > > > > > > > mdp5_wait_flush() (indirectly) calls mdp5_crtc_wait_for_pp_done(), > > > > > > > which waits for a pp-done irq regardless of whether there is a flush > > > > > > > in progress. Since there is no flush pending, the irq never comes. > > > > > > > But the expectation is that kms_funcs->wait_flush() returns > > > > > > > immediately if there is nothing to wait for. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think that's happening in this case. I added some pr_info() > > > > > > statements to request_pp_done_pending() and mdp5_crtc_pp_done_irq(). > > > > > > Here's the first two sets of messages that appear in dmesg: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 14.018907] msm fd900000.mdss: pp done time out, lm=0 > > > > > > [ 14.018993] request_pp_done_pending: HERE > > > > > > [ 14.074208] mdp5_crtc_pp_done_irq: HERE > > > > > > [ 14.074368] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 135x120 > > > > > > [ 14.138938] msm fd900000.mdss: pp done time out, lm=0 > > > > > > [ 14.139021] request_pp_done_pending: HERE > > > > > > [ 14.158097] mdp5_crtc_pp_done_irq: HERE > > > > > > > > > > > > The messages go on like this with the same pattern. > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried two different changes: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I moved the request_pp_done_pending() and corresponding if statement > > > > > > from mdp5_crtc_atomic_flush() and into mdp5_crtc_atomic_begin(). > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) I increased the timeout in wait_for_completion_timeout() by several > > > > > > increments; all the way to 5 seconds. > > > > > > > > > > increasing the timeout won't help, because the pp-done irq has already > > > > > come at the point where we wait for it.. > > > > > > > > > > maybe the easy thing is just add mdp5_crtc->needs_pp, set to true > > > > > before requesting, and false when we get the irq.. and then > > > > > mdp5_crtc_wait_for_pp_done() just returns if needs_pp==false.. > > > > > > > > On the otherhand, what about trying to make command mode panels > > > > resemble video mode panels slightly? Video mode panels have a vsync > > > > counter in hardware, which is missing from command mode - however it > > > > seems like the driver/drm framework would prefer such a counter. > > > > Would it be a reasonable idea to make a software counter, and just > > > > increment it every time the pp_done irq is triggered? > > > > > > > > I'm just thinking that we'll avoid issues long term by trying to make > > > > the code common, rather than diverging it for the two modes. > > > > > > > > > > *possibly*, but I think we want to account somehow periods where > > > display is not updated. > > > > > > fwiw, it isn't that uncommon for userspace to use vblanks to "keep > > > time" (drive animations for desktop switch, window > > > maximize/unmaximize, etc).. it could be a surprise when "vblank" is > > > not periodic. > > > > What do you think about using some variation of the current value of > > jiffies in the kernel + the number of pp_done IRQs as the software > > counter for command-mode panels? > > > > jiffies is probably too coarse.. but we could use monotonic clock, I guess. > > But I suppose even a cmd mode panel has a "vblank", it is just > internal the panel. Do we get the TE interrupt at regular intervals? > AFAIU this would be tied to the panel's internal vblank. The TE interrupt was first implemented in MDP 1.7.0 (msm8996). 8974 predates that. You can get it from the WR_PTR interrupt, but you have to understand details about your panel to configure that correctly. > > BR, > -R