linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PM / Domains: Add support for 'assigned-performance-states'
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:37:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoRv49jKi-4UW6EVyAzo1emb=rs2h7CWavON+JoXXh1kA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1596541616-27688-3-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org>

On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 13:47, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> For devices which have 'assigned-performance-states' specified in DT,
> set the specified performance state during attach and drop it on detach.
> Also drop/set as part of runtime suspend/resume callbacks.

To allow flexibility, I would prefer to keep the performance state
being orthogonal to the power on/off state for a genpd.

Therefore, I am wondering if this is better handled by the consumer
driver instead?

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pm_domain.h   |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 0a01df60..8704823 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -810,6 +810,10 @@ static int genpd_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>         if (irq_safe_dev_in_no_sleep_domain(dev, genpd))
>                 return 0;
>
> +       /* Drop the assigned performance state */
> +       if (dev_gpd_data(dev)->assigned_pstate)
> +               dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, 0);
> +
>         genpd_lock(genpd);
>         genpd_power_off(genpd, true, 0);
>         genpd_unlock(genpd);
> @@ -829,6 +833,7 @@ static int genpd_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
>         struct gpd_timing_data *td = &dev_gpd_data(dev)->td;
> +       unsigned int assigned_pstate = dev_gpd_data(dev)->assigned_pstate;
>         bool runtime_pm = pm_runtime_enabled(dev);
>         ktime_t time_start;
>         s64 elapsed_ns;
> @@ -857,6 +862,9 @@ static int genpd_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> +       /* Set the assigned performance state */
> +       if (assigned_pstate)
> +               dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, assigned_pstate);
>   out:
>         /* Measure resume latency. */
>         time_start = 0;
> @@ -890,6 +898,8 @@ static int genpd_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  err_poweroff:
>         if (!pm_runtime_is_irq_safe(dev) ||
>                 (pm_runtime_is_irq_safe(dev) && genpd_is_irq_safe(genpd))) {
> +               if (assigned_pstate)
> +                       dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, 0);
>                 genpd_lock(genpd);
>                 genpd_power_off(genpd, true, 0);
>                 genpd_unlock(genpd);
> @@ -2405,6 +2415,12 @@ static void genpd_dev_pm_detach(struct device *dev, bool power_off)
>
>         dev_dbg(dev, "removing from PM domain %s\n", pd->name);
>
> +       /* Drop the assigned performance state */
> +       if (dev_gpd_data(dev)->assigned_pstate) {
> +               dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, 0);
> +               dev_gpd_data(dev)->assigned_pstate = 0;
> +       }
> +
>         for (i = 1; i < GENPD_RETRY_MAX_MS; i <<= 1) {
>                 ret = genpd_remove_device(pd, dev);
>                 if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> @@ -2442,6 +2458,7 @@ static void genpd_dev_pm_sync(struct device *dev)
>  static int __genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev, struct device *base_dev,
>                                  unsigned int index, bool power_on)
>  {
> +       unsigned int assigned_pstate;
>         struct of_phandle_args pd_args;
>         struct generic_pm_domain *pd;
>         int ret;
> @@ -2485,6 +2502,16 @@ static int __genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev, struct device *base_dev,
>         if (ret)
>                 genpd_remove_device(pd, dev);
>
> +       /* Set the assigned performance state */
> +       if (!of_property_read_u32_index(base_dev->of_node,
> +                                       "assigned-performance-states",
> +                                       index, &assigned_pstate)) {
> +               if (assigned_pstate) {
> +                       dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, assigned_pstate);
> +                       dev_gpd_data(dev)->assigned_pstate = assigned_pstate;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
>         return ret ? -EPROBE_DEFER : 1;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> index 9ec78ee..4a415ee 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ struct generic_pm_domain_data {
>         struct notifier_block nb;
>         int cpu;
>         unsigned int performance_state;
> +       unsigned int assigned_pstate;
>         void *data;
>  };
>
> --
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-12  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-04 11:46 [PATCH 0/3] Add support for assigned-performance-states Rajendra Nayak
2020-08-04 11:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Introduce 'assigned-performance-states' property Rajendra Nayak
2020-08-05  6:39   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-08-05  8:13     ` Rajendra Nayak
2020-08-05 23:57       ` Stephen Boyd
2020-08-04 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] PM / Domains: Add support for 'assigned-performance-states' Rajendra Nayak
2020-08-12  9:37   ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2020-08-04 11:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: sc7180: Add assigned-performance-states for i2c Rajendra Nayak
2020-08-05  6:41   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-08-05  8:14     ` Rajendra Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPDyKFoRv49jKi-4UW6EVyAzo1emb=rs2h7CWavON+JoXXh1kA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).