From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Regression after "do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch"
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:41:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFp097rBjcJuT1os7W+B5zVUVuprU5_gyE0qU4K=AnA88w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d08ed4e8-84b2-e337-c9ea-a6e36fb6b9e7@intel.com>
Adrian, Linus,
Thanks for looking into this and reporting!
On 18 October 2016 at 15:23, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
> On 18/10/16 11:36, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Before this patch the eMMC is detected and all partitions enumerated
>>> immediately, but after the patch it doesn't come up at all, except
>>> sometimes, when it appears minutes (!) after boot, all of a sudden.
>>
>> FYI this is what it looks like when it eventually happens:
>> root@msm8660:/ [ 627.710175] mmc0: new high speed MMC card at address 0001
>> [ 627.711641] mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 SEM04G 3.69 GiB
>> [ 627.715485] mmcblk0boot0: mmc0:0001 SEM04G partition 1 1.00 MiB
>> [ 627.736654] mmcblk0boot1: mmc0:0001 SEM04G partition 2 1.00 MiB
>> [ 627.747397] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 SEM04G partition 3 128 KiB
>> [ 627.756326] mmcblk0: p1 p2 p3 p4 < p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10 p11 p12 p13
>> p14 p15 p16 p17 p18 p19 p20 p21 >
>>
>> So after 627 seconds, a bit hard for users to wait this long for their
>> root filesystem.
>
> If the driver does not support busy detection and the eMMC card provides
> zero as the cmd6 generic timeout (which it may especially as cmd6 generic
> timeout wasn't added until eMMCv4.5), then __mmc_switch() defaults to
> waiting 10 minutes i.e.
>
> #define MMC_OPS_TIMEOUT_MS (10 * 60 * 1000) /* 10 minute timeout */
Urgh! Yes, I have verified that this is exactly what happens.
>
> So removal of CMD13 polling for HS mode (as per commit
> 08573eaf1a70104f83fdbee9b84e5be03480e9ed) is going to be a problem for some
> combinations of eMMC cards and host drivers.
I was looking in the __mmc_switch() function, it's just a pain to walk
trough it :-) So first out I decided to clean it up and factor out the
polling parts. I will post the patches first out tomorrow morning,
running some final test right now.
Although, that of course doesn't solve our problem. As I see it we
only have a few options here.
1) In case when cmd6 generic timeout isn't available, let's assign
another empirically selected value.
2) Use a specific timeout when switching to HS mode.
3) Even if we deploy 1 (and 2), perhaps we still should allow polling
with CMD13 for switching to HS mode - unless it causes issues for some
cards/drivers combination?
BTW, I already tried 2) and it indeed solves the problem, although
depending on the selected timeout, it might delay the card detection
to process.
Thoughts?
Kind regards
Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-19 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-17 14:32 Regression after "do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch" Linus Walleij
2016-10-18 4:06 ` Ritesh Harjani
2016-10-19 1:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-18 8:36 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-18 13:23 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-10-19 16:41 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2016-10-20 2:22 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-10-20 7:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-10-20 7:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-10-20 11:00 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-10-27 10:04 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-10-31 13:09 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-11-01 1:43 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-11-02 8:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-11-02 10:28 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-11-02 12:51 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-11-03 3:39 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-10-20 15:17 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-10-24 14:23 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPDyKFp097rBjcJuT1os7W+B5zVUVuprU5_gyE0qU4K=AnA88w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).