RE: [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: Disable interrupt in reset path

[Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>]

> 
> On 2021-02-28 22:23, Avri Altman wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Nitin Rawat <nitirawa@codeaurora.org>
> >>
> >> Disable interrupt in reset path to flush pending IRQ handler in order
> >> to
> >> avoid possible NoC issues.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <nitirawa@codeaurora.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>


> >> ---
> >>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> >> index f97d7b0..a9dc8d7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> >> @@ -253,12 +253,17 @@ static int ufs_qcom_host_reset(struct ufs_hba
> >> *hba)
> >>  {
> >>         int ret = 0;
> >>         struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
> >> +       bool reenable_intr = false;
> >>
> >>         if (!host->core_reset) {
> >>                 dev_warn(hba->dev, "%s: reset control not set\n",
> >> __func__);
> >>                 goto out;
> >>         }
> >>
> >> +       reenable_intr = hba->is_irq_enabled;
> >> +       disable_irq(hba->irq);
> >> +       hba->is_irq_enabled = false;
> >> +
> >>         ret = reset_control_assert(host->core_reset);
> >>         if (ret) {
> >>                 dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: core_reset assert failed, err =
> >> %d\n",
> >> @@ -280,6 +285,11 @@ static int ufs_qcom_host_reset(struct ufs_hba
> >> *hba)
> >>
> >>         usleep_range(1000, 1100);
> >>
> >> +       if (reenable_intr) {
> >> +               enable_irq(hba->irq);
> >> +               hba->is_irq_enabled = true;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> > If in the future, you will enable UFSHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_HCE on your
> > platform (currently only for Exynos),
> > Will this code still work?
> 
> Yes, it still works.
> 
> Thanks,
> Can Guo.