From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pantelis Antoniou Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Add simple NVMEM Framework via regmap. Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 19:51:45 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1427752492-17039-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <1432226535-8640-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1432226535-8640-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Srinivas Kandagatla Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Maxime Ripard , Rob Herring , Kumar Gala , Mark Brown , Sascha Hauer , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , sboyd@codeaurora.org, Matt Porter List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Hi Srinivas, > On May 21, 2015, at 19:42 , Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: >=20 > Thankyou all for providing inputs and comments on previous versions o= f this patchset. > Here is the v5 of the patchset addressing all the issues raised as > part of previous versions review. >=20 >=20 [snip] I tried to use the updated patchset with my at24 & beaglebone capemanag= er patches. I have a big problem with the removal of the raw of_* access APIs. Take for instance the case where you have multiple slot accessing diffe= rent EEPROMs. > slots { > slot@0 { > eeprom =3D <&cape0_data>; > }; >=20 > slot@1 { > eeprom =3D <&cape1_data>; > }; > }; In that case there is no per-device node mapping; it=E2=80=99s a per-su= b node. =46or now I=E2=80=99m exporting the of_* accessors again, please consid= er exposing the of_* API again. > --=20 > 1.9.1 >=20 Regards =E2=80=94 Pantelis