From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85671C47082 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 16:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD94610E7 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 16:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233924AbhEaQby (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2021 12:31:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41322 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234574AbhEaQ3w (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2021 12:29:52 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46F44C061231; Mon, 31 May 2021 07:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f080f002c54d32600da041e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f08:f00:2c54:d326:da:41e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id CE2831EC03D5; Mon, 31 May 2021 16:57:48 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1622473068; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=q7UmMu6yCEwDn6Mhju/5FZSpRM+RHoqO1YzwnVQdAIc=; b=CnuqzZp9CdIqZCLzQ/uVm/VkRZPAVWiKX6Ujd8k8/5gz7ZyPKx2HrfSRB8bHOcPB0Ndx2x 5If4ygHSaRaj2YwFd+7G3YcIUzLndyEgJVBDtJXeT4C5hEUIpFT+99CAf5zBRUpjPIsbBI B4beGHQQWlCAKGw5o9PAQfLZgl7YT4c= Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 16:57:39 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Zhen Lei Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tony Luck , James Morse , Robert Richter , Johannes Thumshirn , Ralf Baechle , Dinh Nguyen , Jan Luebbe , Andre Przywara , Channagoud Kadabi , Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Khuong Dinh , York Sun , linux-edac , linux-mips , linux-arm-msm , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] edac: Use 'ret' instead of 'res' to store the return value Message-ID: References: <20210531145302.9655-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20210531145302.9655-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210531145302.9655-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:53:02PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: > Usually 'ret' or 'rc' is used as the abbreviation for 'return code', and > 'res' is used as the abbreviation for 'resource'. Or "result." Please refrain from doing pointless patches like that - it is a totally unnecessary churn. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette