From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9A8C433FE for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102E760EE5 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240826AbhJOOt7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:49:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59758 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240848AbhJOOty (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:49:54 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 927BCC061772 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 62-20020a9d0a44000000b00552a6f8b804so12545370otg.13 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:47:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=++7yTK3eP5/FAO2Z0iSkv+MDdc9B89z1wkbeU182Ikg=; b=XbPtXBIpqXS+4GqKUpLKnV/TL+EYThYjN2Cv59T7YtpgcFk7nvnfhURMU1P6igmu5n Lg6HiV8Ul7ZsJoL8tsChafYC1KPwjh4CPHQgWqUcfMMZ4I3THsL0kRAW1fwdw41G/UMm ZVGxLF4qC7/KEI2KjTsNcGz9Qm1iMwIbxEpbuMmI2Hog8TvbIEUEZV8qstnjyh6Z7zvO XeJ7b3qWz84ZOkiZyQ9qPacf+Ggxhub1DzfDOtcRRGB9HhmYgu62GN1axwEtZGVAHxdz rlUJvUyO/cT1FsdwGLG7YybpFRdZpNhoqntShLvILJcFWXJkmTLcsU6+wX9GRW87RiWb MzZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=++7yTK3eP5/FAO2Z0iSkv+MDdc9B89z1wkbeU182Ikg=; b=d9TOAR9ImLYdilYq5NmEh4HICwRBhjFm3KRQer5OBoCORh85oat0shlpbZoLKzCuAb WTcBiqhPAWwZH1KMQRV2oHUDTEF8YL6Qd8P8LzWFhP8OV61Q6za9mUtxqZjGfnSy+GOY eSCEqpUTBl2BYnVJHudtjAttDDD8RHtuKznobAVuQ6bImtQsgkoNNg9dyGI4aOp4BFn4 obbMMmotERqYSBnurSePN9ZjznPeLqs7KFr0Zq3CF6MqEflxQ2Am2/pydD4tz4YScMNQ ODwuCUPeuGsdmt2lOvX13HcrTfc21v1HRk0tvlYEHswew2p7b3dez1Dkl/VFVEEvQNdE Kg+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305eeK+SJXDsWSqVnHdIKYMgKlbfiOWKWM9U1/paCe3ZHbyVbEu lE57zzEzd1Pl8jvNUJGfXVjKDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGAZ75fYt5dPrlwAFKkMmfgKxwkXWHpeKEeQM39FmqX5zKruHfjOM0yMa3O+bAFrGIsmDFBg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:214c:: with SMTP id r12mr8343587otd.200.1634309266857; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder.lan ([2600:1700:a0:3dc8:3697:f6ff:fe85:aac9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bf3sm1193006oib.34.2021.10.15.07.47.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:47:44 -0500 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Deepak Kumar Singh Cc: clew@codeaurora.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konstantin Dorfman Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/6] rpmsg: glink: fix destroy channel endpoint logic Message-ID: References: <1596086296-28529-1-git-send-email-deesin@codeaurora.org> <1596086296-28529-2-git-send-email-deesin@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1596086296-28529-2-git-send-email-deesin@codeaurora.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Thu 30 Jul 00:18 CDT 2020, Deepak Kumar Singh wrote: > From: Konstantin Dorfman > > When rpmsg client driver destroys last channel endpoint, remove rpmsg > device is triggered. In both cases (destroy endpoint and remove device) > a glink close command sent to the remote peer. > > This change, when for removing rpmsg device endpoint already destroyed > will avoid sending second glink close command. > Should it really be considered valid to rpmsg_destroy_ept() the rpmsg_device's primary endpoint? Do you have a use case where this makes sense? Also, I think this has a potential to hide a problems of clients doing a "double free" on the ept. Regards, Bjorn > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman > Signed-off-by: Deepak Kumar Singh > --- > drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c > index 1995f5b..2668c66 100644 > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c > @@ -1210,6 +1210,10 @@ static void qcom_glink_destroy_ept(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept) > unsigned long flags; > > spin_lock_irqsave(&channel->recv_lock, flags); > + if (!channel->ept.cb) { > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&channel->recv_lock, flags); > + return; > + } > channel->ept.cb = NULL; > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&channel->recv_lock, flags); > > -- > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project >