From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A572C64EC4 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230480AbjBTP03 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:26:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53904 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230076AbjBTP01 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:26:27 -0500 Received: from mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.168.131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 837A6206A5; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:25:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0279867.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 31KDuHHh029277; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:25:26 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=qcppdkim1; bh=OQHfhbFp2rqrgd2ruKS+ejVr693oIrb4khbUXHUSsMg=; b=X3BasCXdN9+IxRcCBpqRZlnu3xiMRKgZypqWau/gAS304nUgTe4ih8mrNnh0q45LHbbb 2TwP7GUHt2TJKwwd1TVXP+eFm4tCYbAe88kW47ujuGcKHb7VR0n3al1ZXgMlGRrmCDdV PGLqBxqGIuZ4nsO9p1kr36JFfbtO1+14I4yJOHDvaShtzgzdYNvq1kNJj2UzNHtvYJT7 SDSVKZfq1gv//VNP33cK0ACnaWOZSb5Ru+7kupQ68EiG7JPYboXWXyINahmn1XlTL+ly MkiHl0Uq6DaXT9eSa+9gVJzrzrmlXp050PAN8rlYwdQ29IVH5gKuZT8lv9xJKDKp6kIS Cw== Received: from nalasppmta03.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ntmcm5dmj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:25:26 +0000 Received: from nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.209.196]) by NALASPPMTA03.qualcomm.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 31KFPOmT001071 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:25:24 GMT Received: from [10.216.11.20] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.41; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:25:16 -0800 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 20:55:13 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] PCI: qcom: Add IPQ9574 PCIe support Content-Language: en-US To: Kathiravan T , Sricharan Ramabadhran , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , References: <20230214164135.17039-1-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com> <20230214164135.17039-3-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com> <6ea43d8d-7b9c-5a11-097f-906e10ac3627@quicinc.com> <184a38a0-f2de-dd63-a8af-f4784c61365a@quicinc.com> From: Devi Priya In-Reply-To: <184a38a0-f2de-dd63-a8af-f4784c61365a@quicinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) To nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: SGm6yOCcqlWTNSWstRhhHbdMM4MyZu7x X-Proofpoint-GUID: SGm6yOCcqlWTNSWstRhhHbdMM4MyZu7x X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-02-20_12,2023-02-20_02,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=985 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2302200141 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 2/20/2023 8:21 PM, Kathiravan T wrote: > > On 2/20/2023 7:11 PM, Devi Priya wrote: >> Hi Sri, >> Thanks for taking time to review the patch! >> >> On 2/16/2023 5:08 PM, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote: >>> Hi Devi, >>> >>> On 2/14/2023 10:11 PM, Devi Priya wrote: >>>> Adding PCIe support for IPQ9574 SoC >>>> >>>> Co-developed-by: Anusha Rao >>>> Signed-off-by: Anusha Rao >>>> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya >>>> --- >>>>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 119 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>   1 file changed, 119 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >>>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >>>> index a232b04af048..57606c113d45 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >>>> @@ -193,6 +193,12 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 { >>>>       struct reset_control *rst; >>>>   }; >>>> +struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_27_0 { >>>> +    struct clk_bulk_data *clks; >>>> +    struct reset_control *rst; >>>> +    int num_clks; >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>>   union qcom_pcie_resources { >>>>       struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_0_0 v1_0_0; >>>>       struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 v2_1_0; >>>> @@ -201,6 +207,7 @@ union qcom_pcie_resources { >>>>       struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_4_0 v2_4_0; >>>>       struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 v2_7_0; >>>>       struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 v2_9_0; >>>> +    struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_27_0 v1_27_0; >>>>   }; >>>>   struct qcom_pcie; >>>> @@ -1409,6 +1416,104 @@ static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct >>>> qcom_pcie *pcie) >>>>       return 0; >>>>   } >>>> +static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) >>>> +{ >>>> +    struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_27_0 *res = &pcie->res.v1_27_0; >>>> +    struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci; >>>> +    struct device *dev = pci->dev; >>>> + >>>> +    res->num_clks = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &res->clks); >>>> +    if (res->clks < 0) >>>> +        return res->num_clks; >>>> + >>>> +    res->rst = devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive(dev); >>>> +    if (IS_ERR(res->rst)) >>>> +        return PTR_ERR(res->rst); >>>> + >>>> +    return 0; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static void qcom_pcie_deinit_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) >>>> +{ >>>> +    struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_27_0 *res = &pcie->res.v1_27_0; >>>> + >>>> +    clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(res->num_clks, res->clks); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static int qcom_pcie_init_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) >>>> +{ >>>> +    struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_27_0 *res = &pcie->res.v1_27_0; >>>> +    struct device *dev = pcie->pci->dev; >>>> +    int ret; >>>> + >>>> +    ret = reset_control_assert(res->rst); >>>> +    if (ret) { >>>> +        dev_err(dev, "reset assert failed (%d)\n", ret); >>>> +        return ret; >>>> +    } >>>> + >>>> +    /* >>>> +     * Delay periods before and after reset deassert are working >>>> values >>>> +     * from downstream Codeaurora kernel >>>> +     */ >>>> +    usleep_range(2000, 2500); >>>> + >>>> +    ret = reset_control_deassert(res->rst); >>>> +    if (ret) { >>>> +        dev_err(dev, "reset deassert failed (%d)\n", ret); >>>> +        return ret; >>>> +    } >>>> + >>>> +    usleep_range(2000, 2500); >>>> + >>>> +    return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(res->num_clks, res->clks); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static int qcom_pcie_post_init_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) >>>> +{ >>>> +    struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci; >>>> +    u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); >>>> +    u32 val; >>>> +    int i; >>>> + >>>> +    writel(0x8000000, pcie->parf + >>>> PCIE20_v3_PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE); > > > Devi, > > > Above statement also differs. You need to consider this also when you > use the 2_9_0 ops. > Sure, thanks kathir. Will take care of this as well > Best Regards, Devi Priya > Thanks, > > >>>> + >>>> +    val = readl(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL); >>>> +    val &= ~BIT(0); >>>> +    writel(val, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL); >>>> + >>>> +    writel(0, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_DBI_BASE_ADDR); >>>> + >>>> +    writel(DEVICE_TYPE_RC, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_DEVICE_TYPE); >>>> +    writel(BYPASS | MSTR_AXI_CLK_EN | AHB_CLK_EN, >>>> +           pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_MHI_CLOCK_RESET_CTRL); >>>> +    writel(GEN3_RELATED_OFF_RXEQ_RGRDLESS_RXTS | >>>> +           GEN3_RELATED_OFF_GEN3_ZRXDC_NONCOMPL, >>>> +           pci->dbi_base + GEN3_RELATED_OFF); >>>> + >>>> +    writel(MST_WAKEUP_EN | SLV_WAKEUP_EN | MSTR_ACLK_CGC_DIS | >>>> +           SLV_ACLK_CGC_DIS | CORE_CLK_CGC_DIS | >>>> +           AUX_PWR_DET | L23_CLK_RMV_DIS | L1_CLK_RMV_DIS, >>>> +           pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_SYS_CTRL); >>>> + >>>> +    writel(0, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_Q2A_FLUSH); >>>> + >>>> +    dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); >>>> +    writel(PCIE_CAP_SLOT_VAL, pci->dbi_base + offset + >>>> PCI_EXP_SLTCAP); >>>> + >>>> +    val = readl(pci->dbi_base + offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP); >>>> +    val &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_ASPMS; >>>> +    writel(val, pci->dbi_base + offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP); >>>> + >>>> +    writel(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_COMP_TMOUT_DIS, pci->dbi_base + offset + >>>> +           PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2); >>>> + >>>> +    for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) >>>> +        writel(0, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_BDF_TO_SID_TABLE_N + (4 >>>> * i)); >>>> + >>>> +    return 0; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>>   static int qcom_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) >>>>   { >>>>       u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); >>>> @@ -1620,6 +1725,15 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_2_9_0 = { >>>>       .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable, >>>>   }; >>>> +/* Qcom IP rev.: 1.27.0 Synopsys IP rev.: 5.80a */ >>>> +static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_1_27_0 = { >>>> +    .get_resources = qcom_pcie_get_resources_1_27_0, >>>> +    .init = qcom_pcie_init_1_27_0, >>>> +    .post_init = qcom_pcie_post_init_1_27_0, >>>> +    .deinit = qcom_pcie_deinit_1_27_0, >>>> +    .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable, >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>>   static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_1_0_0 = { >>>>       .ops = &ops_1_0_0, >>>>   }; >>>> @@ -1652,6 +1766,10 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_2_9_0 = { >>>>       .ops = &ops_2_9_0, >>>>   }; >>>> +static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_1_27_0 = { >>>> +    .ops = &ops_1_27_0, >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>>   static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { >>>>       .link_up = qcom_pcie_link_up, >>>>       .start_link = qcom_pcie_start_link, >>>> @@ -1829,6 +1947,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id >>>> qcom_pcie_match[] = { >>>>       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2", .data = &cfg_2_1_0 }, >>>>       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074", .data = &cfg_2_3_3 }, >>>>       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3", .data = &cfg_2_9_0 }, >>>> +    { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq9574", .data = &cfg_1_27_0 }, >>> >>>    I do not see much difference between 2_9_0 and 1_27_0. Is this patch >>>    really required. Can you check if it works with 2_9_0 itself ? >> Yes right Sri, Only the clocks seem to differ between 2_9_0 and 1_27_0. >> Will update 2_9_0 ops to get the clocks from the DT and use the same >> for ipq9574 in the next spin. >> >> Best Regards, >> Devi Priya >>> >>> Regards, >>>   Sricharan