linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pheragu@codeaurora.org
To: marc.zyngier@arm.com, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-arm Msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: psodagud@codeaurora.org, Tsoni <tsoni@codeaurora.org>,
	rananta@codeaurora.org, mnalajal@codeaurora.org
Subject: Warning seen when removing a module using irqdomain framework
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:52:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa6a66a7671f12f19d0364755e76de0d@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Hi,

I have been working on a interrupt controller driver that uses tree 
based mapping for its domain (irq_domain_add_tree(..)).
If I understand correctly, the clients get a mapping when they call 
platform_get_irq(..).
However, after these clients are removed (rmmod), when I try to remove 
the interrupt controller driver where it calls irq_domain_remove(..), I 
hit this warning from kernel/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:: 
irq_domain_remove(..)
[WARN_ON(!radix_tree_empty(&domain->revmap_tree));]-
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 238 at /kernel/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:246 
irq_domain_remove+0x84/0x98

Also, I see that the requested IRQs by the clients are still present (in 
/proc/interrupts) even after they had been removed.
Hence, I just wanted to know how to handle this warning. Should the 
client clean up by calling irq_dispose_mapping(..) or is it the 
responsibility of the interrupt controller driver to dispose the 
mappings one by one?

Regards,
Prakruthi Deepak Heragu

             reply	other threads:[~2019-07-23 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-23 21:52 pheragu [this message]
2019-07-24  6:51 ` Warning seen when removing a module using irqdomain framework Marc Zyngier
2019-07-25 21:41   ` pheragu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa6a66a7671f12f19d0364755e76de0d@codeaurora.org \
    --to=pheragu@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mnalajal@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rananta@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).