From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4382AC43219 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229852AbiJSVG7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:06:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57298 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229724AbiJSVG6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:06:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f46.google.com (mail-pj1-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AED51C711A; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-f46.google.com with SMTP id p6-20020a17090a748600b002103d1ef63aso1141630pjk.1; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:06:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=POgrPH0QW5EEasJFZKLziKAu/5jnGnv4BrNRsIchY2I=; b=F8KtfyDuRMho0PbdxhtilIfNb/s2aBFNMtCA8GXT+rGB1z6HM7WCmNJkhUb66HyCzw jdCuODgbJr/g+3+HvaDS7RaNcxCnt9IuS65Zcoqx5DnbESG7gYnncVFLtUdvu7aF/vD8 CyfAFh4/1+uwumwJq8xq2HyyRu+V6FIFXKFb9XkIwq9q9Lk/1Y1fkE15AH4DliEezKYx AsWq8DWdWy6l6OeJGsQ+9/urg5GQr6QR+aZ8eJPvmqLAoJ4lI3MgAZTCC8vEGPB2rW51 zhNTYfEf7M/t2jST71kAMMZDkQ5sEmjOBW2Hv/jUs50CnBF7ftmHwVHUYBS0QWuqoH3A OFAg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0MIKbfx5k0p3FajZrZKrhV3UF3u63RP2AS2g/b5/CScCQxwJef 2lFzuAJ+Ds9Oig0CXYgeq7k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM604XRQj4PIwV/ML4HC8OEyrRFfYk62IgnXmSwvU6YnHiHnWbQa5W1yUOE6blx9+US6ps7fmQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bd46:b0:17e:8ee5:7b61 with SMTP id b6-20020a170902bd4600b0017e8ee57b61mr10693371plx.44.1666213616761; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2620:15c:211:201:8280:2606:af57:d34? ([2620:15c:211:201:8280:2606:af57:d34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c123-20020a624e81000000b005624e2e0508sm11729693pfb.207.2022.10.19.14.06.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:06:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH v2 06/17] ufs: core: mcq: Configure resource regions Content-Language: en-US To: Asutosh Das , Eddie Huang Cc: Can Guo , quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com, quic_rampraka@quicinc.com, quic_bhaskarv@quicinc.com, quic_richardp@quicinc.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com, quic_xiaosenh@quicinc.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, mani@kernel.org, beanhuo@micron.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com, liang-yen.wang@mediatek.com References: <11530912-36fd-8c69-4beb-de955eaae529@quicinc.com> <6592c7fe-0828-6bb3-17a8-9db53aac1873@quicinc.com> <83fe64628b6d44f28637a6a8ba6b21eb0848caaa.camel@mediatek.com> <20221018014754.GE10252@asutoshd-linux1.qualcomm.com> <12ab65aed221dec23451e9b60c0e00a4d9ef0df2.camel@mediatek.com> <20221019195040.GA18511@asutoshd-linux1.qualcomm.com> From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20221019195040.GA18511@asutoshd-linux1.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 10/19/22 12:50, Asutosh Das wrote: > While adding the vops it occurred to me that it'd remain empty because > ufs-qcom > doesn't need it. And I'm not sure how MTK register space is laid out. > So please can you help add a vops in the next version? > I can address the other comment and push the series. Please do not introduce new vops without adding at least one implementation of the vop in the same patch series. How about letting MediaTek add more vops as necessary in a separate patch series and focusing in this patch series on UFSHCI 4.0 compliance? Thanks, Bart.