linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
To: cang@codeaurora.org, Avri.Altman@wdc.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [<RFC RESEND PATCH v2> 0/3] WriteBooster Feature Support
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:59:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1584752043.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Still a RFC patch, because I'm still expecting some comments
on the design.

v1 -> v2:
- Addressed comments on v1

- Supports shared buffer mode only

- Didn't use exception event as suggested.
  The reason being while testing I saw that the WriteBooster
  available buffer remains at 0x1 for a longer time if flush is
  enabled all the time as compared to an event-based enablement.
  This essentially means that writes go to the WriteBooster buffer
  more. Spec says that the if flush is enabled, the device would
  flush when it sees the command queue empty. So I guess that'd trigger
  flush more than an event based approach.
  Anyway the Vcc would be turned-off during system suspend, so flush
  would stop anyway.
  In this patchset, I never turn-off flush.
  Hence the RFC.

Asutosh Das (3):
  scsi: ufs: add write booster feature support
  ufs-qcom: scsi: configure write booster type
  ufs: sysfs: add sysfs entries for write booster

 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c  |   7 ++
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c |  39 ++++++-
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h       |  37 ++++++-
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c    | 238 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h    |   9 ++
 5 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.


             reply	other threads:[~2020-03-21  1:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-21  0:59 Asutosh Das [this message]
2020-03-21  0:59 ` [<RFC RESEND PATCH v2> 1/3] scsi: ufs: add write booster feature support Asutosh Das
2020-03-21  0:59 ` [<RFC RESEND PATCH v2> 2/3] ufs-qcom: scsi: configure write booster type Asutosh Das
2020-03-21  0:59 ` [<RFC RESEND PATCH v2> 3/3] ufs: sysfs: add sysfs entries for write booster Asutosh Das
2020-03-26 21:53 ` [<RFC RESEND PATCH v2> 0/3] WriteBooster Feature Support Avri Altman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1584752043.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --to=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).