linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Jordan Crouse <jordan@cosmicpenguin.net>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCHv3 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the adreno smmu specific impl earlier
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:34:57 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecd47256b13adb6c5c32c7597581f436c90f135a.1618898456.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1618898456.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>

Adreno(GPU) SMMU and APSS(Application Processor SubSystem) SMMU
both implement "arm,mmu-500" in some QTI SoCs and to run through
adreno smmu specific implementation such as enabling split pagetables
support, we need to match the "qcom,adreno-smmu" compatible first
before apss smmu or else we will be running apps smmu implementation
for adreno smmu and the additional features for adreno smmu is never
set. For ex: we have "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500" compatible for both apps
and adreno smmu implementing "arm,mmu-500", so the adreno smmu
implementation is never reached because the current sequence checks
for apps smmu compatible(qcom,sc7280-smmu-500) first and runs that
specific impl and we never reach adreno smmu specific implementation.

Suggested-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jordan Crouse <jordan@cosmicpenguin.net>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index bea3ee0dabc2..03f048aebb80 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -345,11 +345,17 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 {
 	const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;
 
-	if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
-		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
-
+	/*
+	 * Do not change this order of implementation, i.e., first adreno
+	 * smmu impl and then apss smmu since we can have both implementing
+	 * arm,mmu-500 in which case we will miss setting adreno smmu specific
+	 * features if the order is changed.
+	 */
 	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
 		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl);
 
+	if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
+		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
+
 	return smmu;
 }
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-20  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-20  6:04 [PATCHv3 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SC7280 support Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-04-20  6:04 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SC7280 SMMU compatible Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-05-25  4:03   ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-04-20  6:04 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
2021-05-24  2:43 ` [PATCHv3 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SC7280 support Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-06-07  2:55   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-06-08 12:01 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 12:32   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ecd47256b13adb6c5c32c7597581f436c90f135a.1618898456.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=akhilpo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jordan@cosmicpenguin.net \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).