From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 12:29:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1478194250-19132-1-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:44976 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964819AbcKDQaM (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:30:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1478194250-19132-1-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> (Vivek Gautam's message of "Thu, 3 Nov 2016 23:00:50 +0530") Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Vivek Gautam Cc: kishon@ti.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vinholikatti@gmail.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, subhashj@codeaurora.org, ygardi@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Vivek" == Vivek Gautam writes: Vivek> Add phy clock enable code to phy_power_on/off callbacks, and Vivek> remove explicit calls to enable these phy clocks from the Vivek> ufs-qcom hcd driver. Vivek: I tried to apply v3 with the revised patch 9/12 but that didn't fly. Please send a v5 series against 4.10/scsi-queue with the review tags from Subhash applied. Subhash and others: Please make sure you put your Reviewed-by: tags on a separate line. There were a few patches that had "LGTM, Reviewed-by:..." and patchwork sadly does not pick those up. Thanks! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering