linux-audit.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak120] audit: trigger accompanying records when no rules present
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 20:58:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200310005858.m4s23fl3huwevyp5@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhS9o7wmBEfvF=+=cfUzvfcTs9Hu15KcLJjW+92KxBxQ3g@mail.gmail.com>

On 2020-03-09 19:55, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:31 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 2020-02-27 20:02, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:01 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When there are no audit rules registered, mandatory records (config,
> > > > etc.) are missing their accompanying records (syscall, proctitle, etc.).
> > > >
> > > > This is due to audit context dummy set on syscall entry based on absence
> > > > of rules that signals that no other records are to be printed.
> > > >
> > > > Clear the dummy bit in auditsc_set_stamp() when the first record of an
> > > > event is generated.
> > > >
> > > > Please see upstream github issue
> > > > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/120
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  kernel/auditsc.c | 2 ++
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > > > index 4effe01ebbe2..31195d122344 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > > > @@ -2176,6 +2176,8 @@ int auditsc_get_stamp(struct audit_context *ctx,
> > > >         t->tv_sec  = ctx->ctime.tv_sec;
> > > >         t->tv_nsec = ctx->ctime.tv_nsec;
> > > >         *serial    = ctx->serial;
> > > > +       if (ctx->dummy)
> > > > +               ctx->dummy = 0;
> > >
> > > Two comments:
> > >
> > > * Why even bother checking to see if ctx->dummy is true?  If it is
> > > true you set it to false/0; if it is already false you leave it alone.
> > > Either way ctx->dummy is going to be set to false when you are past
> > > these two lines, might as well just always set ctx->dummy to false/0.
> >
> > Ok, no problem.
> >
> > > * Why are you setting ->dummy to false in auditsc_get_stamp() and not
> > > someplace a bit more obvious like audit_log_start()?  Is it because
> > > auditsc_get_stamp() only gets called once per event?  I'm willing to
> > > take the "hit" of one extra assignment in audit_log_start() to keep
> > > this in a more obvious place and not buried in auditsc_get_stamp().
> >
> > It is because the context is only available when syscall logging is
> > enabled (which is on most platforms and hopefully eventually all) and
> > makes for cleaner code and lack of need to check existance of the
> > context.
> 
> At the very least let's create some sort of accessor function for
> dummy then, hiding this in auditsc_get_stamp() seems very wrong to me.

Ok.  Anything else?

I also found useless context and dummy checks in audit_log_proctitle
and removed them since it can't be called if the context doesn't exist.

> paul moore

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-10  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-18 21:00 [PATCH ghak120] audit: trigger accompanying records when no rules present Richard Guy Briggs
2020-02-18 21:00 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2020-02-28  1:02 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-28  1:02   ` Paul Moore
2020-03-09 20:31   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2020-03-09 23:55     ` Paul Moore
2020-03-10  0:58       ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2020-03-10 12:08         ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200310005858.m4s23fl3huwevyp5@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
    --to=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).