linux-audit.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, linux-audit@redhat.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v19 02/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure.
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:32:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724203226.16374-3-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724203226.16374-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

When more than one security module is exporting data to
audit and networking sub-systems a single 32 bit integer
is no longer sufficient to represent the data. Add a
structure to be used instead.

The lsmblob structure is currently an array of
u32 "secids". There is an entry for each of the
security modules built into the system that would
use secids if active. The system assigns the module
a "slot" when it registers hooks. If modules are
compiled in but not registered there will be unused
slots.

A new lsm_id structure, which contains the name
of the LSM and its slot number, is created. There
is an instance for each LSM, which assigns the name
and passes it to the infrastructure to set the slot.

The audit rules data is expanded to use an array of
security module data rather than a single instance.
Because IMA uses the audit rule functions it is
affected as well.

Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 include/linux/audit.h               |  4 +-
 include/linux/lsm_hooks.h           | 12 ++++-
 include/linux/security.h            | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/auditfilter.c                | 24 +++++-----
 kernel/auditsc.c                    | 12 ++---
 security/apparmor/lsm.c             |  7 ++-
 security/commoncap.c                |  7 ++-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 40 +++++++++++-----
 security/loadpin/loadpin.c          |  8 +++-
 security/lockdown/lockdown.c        |  7 ++-
 security/safesetid/lsm.c            |  8 +++-
 security/security.c                 | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 security/selinux/hooks.c            |  8 +++-
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c          |  7 ++-
 security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c            |  8 +++-
 security/yama/yama_lsm.c            |  7 ++-
 16 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
index 3fcd9ee49734..aabbbe6d9296 100644
--- a/include/linux/audit.h
+++ b/include/linux/audit.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/security.h>
 #include <uapi/linux/audit.h>
 
 #define AUDIT_INO_UNSET ((unsigned long)-1)
@@ -64,8 +65,9 @@ struct audit_field {
 		kuid_t			uid;
 		kgid_t			gid;
 		struct {
+			bool		lsm_isset;
 			char		*lsm_str;
-			void		*lsm_rule;
+			void		*lsm_rules[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
 		};
 	};
 	u32				op;
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index b4bcafc79e0b..c9f792066d86 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -1532,6 +1532,14 @@ struct security_hook_heads {
 	#undef LSM_HOOK
 } __randomize_layout;
 
+/*
+ * Information that identifies a security module.
+ */
+struct lsm_id {
+	const char	*lsm;	/* Name of the LSM */
+	int		slot;	/* Slot in lsmblob if one is allocated */
+};
+
 /*
  * Security module hook list structure.
  * For use with generic list macros for common operations.
@@ -1540,7 +1548,7 @@ struct security_hook_list {
 	struct hlist_node		list;
 	struct hlist_head		*head;
 	union security_list_options	hook;
-	char				*lsm;
+	struct lsm_id			*lsmid;
 } __randomize_layout;
 
 /*
@@ -1575,7 +1583,7 @@ extern struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads;
 extern char *lsm_names;
 
 extern void security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
-				char *lsm);
+			       struct lsm_id *lsmid);
 
 #define LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR	BIT(0)
 #define LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE	BIT(1)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 0a0a03b36a3b..591dae299c6f 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -131,6 +131,64 @@ enum lockdown_reason {
 
 extern const char *const lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX+1];
 
+/*
+ * Data exported by the security modules
+ *
+ * Any LSM that provides secid or secctx based hooks must be included.
+ */
+#define LSMBLOB_ENTRIES ( \
+	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX) ? 1 : 0) + \
+	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) ? 1 : 0) + \
+	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR) ? 1 : 0))
+
+struct lsmblob {
+	u32     secid[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
+};
+
+#define LSMBLOB_INVALID		-1	/* Not a valid LSM slot number */
+#define LSMBLOB_NEEDED		-2	/* Slot requested on initialization */
+#define LSMBLOB_NOT_NEEDED	-3	/* Slot not requested */
+
+/**
+ * lsmblob_init - initialize an lsmblob structure.
+ * @blob: Pointer to the data to initialize
+ * @secid: The initial secid value
+ *
+ * Set all secid for all modules to the specified value.
+ */
+static inline void lsmblob_init(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 secid)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; i++)
+		blob->secid[i] = secid;
+}
+
+/**
+ * lsmblob_is_set - report if there is an value in the lsmblob
+ * @blob: Pointer to the exported LSM data
+ *
+ * Returns true if there is a secid set, false otherwise
+ */
+static inline bool lsmblob_is_set(struct lsmblob *blob)
+{
+	struct lsmblob empty = {};
+
+	return !!memcmp(blob, &empty, sizeof(*blob));
+}
+
+/**
+ * lsmblob_equal - report if the two lsmblob's are equal
+ * @bloba: Pointer to one LSM data
+ * @blobb: Pointer to the other LSM data
+ *
+ * Returns true if all entries in the two are equal, false otherwise
+ */
+static inline bool lsmblob_equal(struct lsmblob *bloba, struct lsmblob *blobb)
+{
+	return !memcmp(bloba, blobb, sizeof(*bloba));
+}
+
 /* These functions are in security/commoncap.c */
 extern int cap_capable(const struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *ns,
 		       int cap, unsigned int opts);
@@ -1820,8 +1878,8 @@ static inline int security_key_getsecurity(struct key *key, char **_buffer)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
 int security_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule);
 int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule);
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule);
-void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule);
+int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void **lsmrule);
+void security_audit_rule_free(void **lsmrule);
 
 #else
 
@@ -1837,12 +1895,12 @@ static inline int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
 }
 
 static inline int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
-					    void *lsmrule)
+					    void **lsmrule)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
+static inline void security_audit_rule_free(void **lsmrule)
 { }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index a10e2997aa6c..f9a632ae7be1 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void audit_free_lsm_field(struct audit_field *f)
 	case AUDIT_OBJ_LEV_LOW:
 	case AUDIT_OBJ_LEV_HIGH:
 		kfree(f->lsm_str);
-		security_audit_rule_free(f->lsm_rule);
+		security_audit_rule_free(f->lsm_rules);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -519,9 +519,10 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data,
 				goto exit_free;
 			}
 			entry->rule.buflen += f_val;
+			f->lsm_isset = true;
 			f->lsm_str = str;
 			err = security_audit_rule_init(f->type, f->op, str,
-						       (void **)&f->lsm_rule);
+						       f->lsm_rules);
 			/* Keep currently invalid fields around in case they
 			 * become valid after a policy reload. */
 			if (err == -EINVAL) {
@@ -774,7 +775,7 @@ static int audit_compare_rule(struct audit_krule *a, struct audit_krule *b)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/* Duplicate LSM field information.  The lsm_rule is opaque, so must be
+/* Duplicate LSM field information.  The lsm_rules is opaque, so must be
  * re-initialized. */
 static inline int audit_dupe_lsm_field(struct audit_field *df,
 					   struct audit_field *sf)
@@ -788,9 +789,9 @@ static inline int audit_dupe_lsm_field(struct audit_field *df,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	df->lsm_str = lsm_str;
 
-	/* our own (refreshed) copy of lsm_rule */
+	/* our own (refreshed) copy of lsm_rules */
 	ret = security_audit_rule_init(df->type, df->op, df->lsm_str,
-				       (void **)&df->lsm_rule);
+				       df->lsm_rules);
 	/* Keep currently invalid fields around in case they
 	 * become valid after a policy reload. */
 	if (ret == -EINVAL) {
@@ -842,7 +843,7 @@ struct audit_entry *audit_dupe_rule(struct audit_krule *old)
 	new->tree = old->tree;
 	memcpy(new->fields, old->fields, sizeof(struct audit_field) * fcount);
 
-	/* deep copy this information, updating the lsm_rule fields, because
+	/* deep copy this information, updating the lsm_rules fields, because
 	 * the originals will all be freed when the old rule is freed. */
 	for (i = 0; i < fcount; i++) {
 		switch (new->fields[i].type) {
@@ -1358,10 +1359,11 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
 			case AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE:
 			case AUDIT_SUBJ_SEN:
 			case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
-				if (f->lsm_rule) {
+				if (f->lsm_isset) {
 					security_task_getsecid(current, &sid);
 					result = security_audit_rule_match(sid,
-						   f->type, f->op, f->lsm_rule);
+						   f->type, f->op,
+						   f->lsm_rules);
 				}
 				break;
 			case AUDIT_EXE:
@@ -1388,7 +1390,7 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int update_lsm_rule(struct audit_krule *r)
+static int update_lsm_rules(struct audit_krule *r)
 {
 	struct audit_entry *entry = container_of(r, struct audit_entry, rule);
 	struct audit_entry *nentry;
@@ -1420,7 +1422,7 @@ static int update_lsm_rule(struct audit_krule *r)
 	return err;
 }
 
-/* This function will re-initialize the lsm_rule field of all applicable rules.
+/* This function will re-initialize the lsm_rules field of all applicable rules.
  * It will traverse the filter lists serarching for rules that contain LSM
  * specific filter fields.  When such a rule is found, it is copied, the
  * LSM field is re-initialized, and the old rule is replaced with the
@@ -1435,7 +1437,7 @@ int audit_update_lsm_rules(void)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < AUDIT_NR_FILTERS; i++) {
 		list_for_each_entry_safe(r, n, &audit_rules_list[i], list) {
-			int res = update_lsm_rule(r);
+			int res = update_lsm_rules(r);
 			if (!err)
 				err = res;
 		}
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index 468a23390457..bafa03a5c866 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -649,14 +649,14 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
 			   match for now to avoid losing information that
 			   may be wanted.   An error message will also be
 			   logged upon error */
-			if (f->lsm_rule) {
+			if (f->lsm_isset) {
 				if (need_sid) {
 					security_task_getsecid(tsk, &sid);
 					need_sid = 0;
 				}
 				result = security_audit_rule_match(sid, f->type,
 								   f->op,
-								   f->lsm_rule);
+								   f->lsm_rules);
 			}
 			break;
 		case AUDIT_OBJ_USER:
@@ -666,21 +666,21 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
 		case AUDIT_OBJ_LEV_HIGH:
 			/* The above note for AUDIT_SUBJ_USER...AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR
 			   also applies here */
-			if (f->lsm_rule) {
+			if (f->lsm_isset) {
 				/* Find files that match */
 				if (name) {
 					result = security_audit_rule_match(
 								name->osid,
 								f->type,
 								f->op,
-								f->lsm_rule);
+								f->lsm_rules);
 				} else if (ctx) {
 					list_for_each_entry(n, &ctx->names_list, list) {
 						if (security_audit_rule_match(
 								n->osid,
 								f->type,
 								f->op,
-								f->lsm_rule)) {
+								f->lsm_rules)) {
 							++result;
 							break;
 						}
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
 					break;
 				if (security_audit_rule_match(ctx->ipc.osid,
 							      f->type, f->op,
-							      f->lsm_rule))
+							      f->lsm_rules))
 					++result;
 			}
 			break;
diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
index f1c365905d5e..432915c1d427 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
@@ -1152,6 +1152,11 @@ struct lsm_blob_sizes apparmor_blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	.lbs_sock = sizeof(struct aa_sk_ctx),
 };
 
+static struct lsm_id apparmor_lsmid __lsm_ro_after_init = {
+	.lsm  = "apparmor",
+	.slot = LSMBLOB_NEEDED
+};
+
 static struct security_hook_list apparmor_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_access_check, apparmor_ptrace_access_check),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_traceme, apparmor_ptrace_traceme),
@@ -1852,7 +1857,7 @@ static int __init apparmor_init(void)
 		goto buffers_out;
 	}
 	security_add_hooks(apparmor_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(apparmor_hooks),
-				"apparmor");
+				&apparmor_lsmid);
 
 	/* Report that AppArmor successfully initialized */
 	apparmor_initialized = 1;
diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
index 59bf3c1674c8..959a9f96b7f1 100644
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -1341,6 +1341,11 @@ int cap_mmap_file(struct file *file, unsigned long reqprot,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
 
+static struct lsm_id capability_lsmid __lsm_ro_after_init = {
+	.lsm  = "capability",
+	.slot = LSMBLOB_NOT_NEEDED
+};
+
 static struct security_hook_list capability_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(capable, cap_capable),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(settime, cap_settime),
@@ -1365,7 +1370,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list capability_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 static int __init capability_init(void)
 {
 	security_add_hooks(capability_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(capability_hooks),
-				"capability");
+			   &capability_lsmid);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index e493063a3c34..a442b8940e93 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
 	bool (*fowner_op)(kuid_t, kuid_t); /* uid_eq(), uid_gt(), uid_lt() */
 	int pcr;
 	struct {
-		void *rule;	/* LSM file metadata specific */
+		void *rules[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES];
 		void *args_p;	/* audit value */
 		int type;	/* audit type */
 	} lsm[MAX_LSM_RULES];
@@ -82,6 +82,22 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
 	struct ima_template_desc *template;
 };
 
+/**
+ * ima_lsm_isset - Is a rule set for any of the active security modules
+ * @rules: The set of IMA rules to check.
+ *
+ * If a rule is set for any LSM return true, otherwise return false.
+ */
+static inline bool ima_lsm_isset(void *rules[])
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; i++)
+		if (rules[i])
+			return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * Without LSM specific knowledge, the default policy can only be
  * written in terms of .action, .func, .mask, .fsmagic, .uid, and .fowner
@@ -256,9 +272,11 @@ __setup("ima_appraise_tcb", default_appraise_policy_setup);
 static void ima_lsm_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 {
 	int i;
+	int r;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
-		kfree(entry->lsm[i].rule);
+		for (r = 0; r < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; r++)
+			kfree(entry->lsm[i].rules[r]);
 		kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p);
 	}
 	kfree(entry);
@@ -293,8 +311,8 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry *ima_lsm_copy_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 		security_filter_rule_init(nentry->lsm[i].type,
 					  Audit_equal,
 					  nentry->lsm[i].args_p,
-					  &nentry->lsm[i].rule);
-		if (!nentry->lsm[i].rule)
+					  nentry->lsm[i].rules);
+		if (!ima_lsm_isset(nentry->lsm[i].rules))
 			pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n",
 				(char *)entry->lsm[i].args_p);
 	}
@@ -463,7 +481,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
 		int rc = 0;
 		u32 osid;
 
-		if (!rule->lsm[i].rule) {
+		if (!ima_lsm_isset(rule->lsm[i].rules)) {
 			if (!rule->lsm[i].args_p)
 				continue;
 			else
@@ -477,7 +495,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
 			rc = security_filter_rule_match(osid,
 							rule->lsm[i].type,
 							Audit_equal,
-							rule->lsm[i].rule);
+							rule->lsm[i].rules);
 			break;
 		case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
 		case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
@@ -485,7 +503,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
 			rc = security_filter_rule_match(secid,
 							rule->lsm[i].type,
 							Audit_equal,
-							rule->lsm[i].rule);
+							rule->lsm[i].rules);
 		default:
 			break;
 		}
@@ -872,7 +890,7 @@ static int ima_lsm_rule_init(struct ima_rule_entry *entry,
 {
 	int result;
 
-	if (entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule)
+	if (ima_lsm_isset(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rules))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p = match_strdup(args);
@@ -883,8 +901,8 @@ static int ima_lsm_rule_init(struct ima_rule_entry *entry,
 	result = security_filter_rule_init(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].type,
 					   Audit_equal,
 					   entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p,
-					   &entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule);
-	if (!entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule) {
+					   entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rules);
+	if (!ima_lsm_isset(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rules)) {
 		pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n",
 			(char *)entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p);
 
@@ -1585,7 +1603,7 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
-		if (entry->lsm[i].rule) {
+		if (ima_lsm_isset(entry->lsm[i].rules)) {
 			switch (i) {
 			case LSM_OBJ_USER:
 				seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_obj_user),
diff --git a/security/loadpin/loadpin.c b/security/loadpin/loadpin.c
index ee5cb944f4ad..86317e78899f 100644
--- a/security/loadpin/loadpin.c
+++ b/security/loadpin/loadpin.c
@@ -180,6 +180,11 @@ static int loadpin_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id)
 	return loadpin_read_file(NULL, (enum kernel_read_file_id) id);
 }
 
+static struct lsm_id loadpin_lsmid __lsm_ro_after_init = {
+	.lsm  = "loadpin",
+	.slot = LSMBLOB_NOT_NEEDED
+};
+
 static struct security_hook_list loadpin_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sb_free_security, loadpin_sb_free_security),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(kernel_read_file, loadpin_read_file),
@@ -227,7 +232,8 @@ static int __init loadpin_init(void)
 	pr_info("ready to pin (currently %senforcing)\n",
 		enforce ? "" : "not ");
 	parse_exclude();
-	security_add_hooks(loadpin_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(loadpin_hooks), "loadpin");
+	security_add_hooks(loadpin_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(loadpin_hooks),
+			   &loadpin_lsmid);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/security/lockdown/lockdown.c b/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
index 87cbdc64d272..4e24ea3f7b7e 100644
--- a/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
+++ b/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
@@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ static struct security_hook_list lockdown_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(locked_down, lockdown_is_locked_down),
 };
 
+static struct lsm_id lockdown_lsmid __lsm_ro_after_init = {
+	.lsm = "lockdown",
+	.slot = LSMBLOB_NOT_NEEDED
+};
+
 static int __init lockdown_lsm_init(void)
 {
 #if defined(CONFIG_LOCK_DOWN_KERNEL_FORCE_INTEGRITY)
@@ -83,7 +88,7 @@ static int __init lockdown_lsm_init(void)
 	lock_kernel_down("Kernel configuration", LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX);
 #endif
 	security_add_hooks(lockdown_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(lockdown_hooks),
-			   "lockdown");
+			   &lockdown_lsmid);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/security/safesetid/lsm.c b/security/safesetid/lsm.c
index 7760019ad35d..950dfb7f931e 100644
--- a/security/safesetid/lsm.c
+++ b/security/safesetid/lsm.c
@@ -149,6 +149,11 @@ static int safesetid_task_fix_setuid(struct cred *new,
 	return -EACCES;
 }
 
+static struct lsm_id safesetid_lsmid __lsm_ro_after_init = {
+	.lsm  = "safesetid",
+	.slot = LSMBLOB_NOT_NEEDED
+};
+
 static struct security_hook_list safesetid_security_hooks[] = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_fix_setuid, safesetid_task_fix_setuid),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(capable, safesetid_security_capable)
@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ static struct security_hook_list safesetid_security_hooks[] = {
 static int __init safesetid_security_init(void)
 {
 	security_add_hooks(safesetid_security_hooks,
-			   ARRAY_SIZE(safesetid_security_hooks), "safesetid");
+			   ARRAY_SIZE(safesetid_security_hooks),
+			   &safesetid_lsmid);
 
 	/* Report that SafeSetID successfully initialized */
 	safesetid_initialized = 1;
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index d2366c694cd8..17d701cd7f69 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -340,6 +340,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_init(void)
 	init_debug("msg_msg blob size  = %d\n", blob_sizes.lbs_msg_msg);
 	init_debug("sock blob size     = %d\n", blob_sizes.lbs_sock);
 	init_debug("task blob size     = %d\n", blob_sizes.lbs_task);
+	init_debug("lsmblob size       = %zu\n", sizeof(struct lsmblob));
 
 	/*
 	 * Create any kmem_caches needed for blobs
@@ -467,21 +468,36 @@ static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Current index to use while initializing the lsmblob secid list.
+ */
+static int lsm_slot __lsm_ro_after_init;
+
 /**
  * security_add_hooks - Add a modules hooks to the hook lists.
  * @hooks: the hooks to add
  * @count: the number of hooks to add
- * @lsm: the name of the security module
+ * @lsmid: the the identification information for the security module
  *
  * Each LSM has to register its hooks with the infrastructure.
+ * If the LSM is using hooks that export secids allocate a slot
+ * for it in the lsmblob.
  */
 void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
-				char *lsm)
+			       struct lsm_id *lsmid)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	if (lsmid->slot == LSMBLOB_NEEDED) {
+		if (lsm_slot >= LSMBLOB_ENTRIES)
+			panic("%s Too many LSMs registered.\n", __func__);
+		lsmid->slot = lsm_slot++;
+		init_debug("%s assigned lsmblob slot %d\n", lsmid->lsm,
+			   lsmid->slot);
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-		hooks[i].lsm = lsm;
+		hooks[i].lsmid = lsmid;
 		hlist_add_tail_rcu(&hooks[i].list, hooks[i].head);
 	}
 
@@ -490,7 +506,7 @@ void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
 	 * and fix this up afterwards.
 	 */
 	if (slab_is_available()) {
-		if (lsm_append(lsm, &lsm_names) < 0)
+		if (lsm_append(lsmid->lsm, &lsm_names) < 0)
 			panic("%s - Cannot get early memory.\n", __func__);
 	}
 }
@@ -1989,7 +2005,7 @@ int security_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, const char *lsm, char *name,
 	struct security_hook_list *hp;
 
 	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.getprocattr, list) {
-		if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsm))
+		if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsmid->lsm))
 			continue;
 		return hp->hook.getprocattr(p, name, value);
 	}
@@ -2002,7 +2018,7 @@ int security_setprocattr(const char *lsm, const char *name, void *value,
 	struct security_hook_list *hp;
 
 	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.setprocattr, list) {
-		if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsm))
+		if (lsm != NULL && strcmp(lsm, hp->lsmid->lsm))
 			continue;
 		return hp->hook.setprocattr(name, value, size);
 	}
@@ -2494,7 +2510,24 @@ int security_key_getsecurity(struct key *key, char **_buffer)
 
 int security_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule)
 {
-	return call_int_hook(audit_rule_init, 0, field, op, rulestr, lsmrule);
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+	bool one_is_good = false;
+	int rc = 0;
+	int trc;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_init, list) {
+		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+			continue;
+		trc = hp->hook.audit_rule_init(field, op, rulestr,
+					       &lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot]);
+		if (trc == 0)
+			one_is_good = true;
+		else
+			rc = trc;
+	}
+	if (one_is_good)
+		return 0;
+	return rc;
 }
 
 int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
@@ -2502,14 +2535,31 @@ int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
 	return call_int_hook(audit_rule_known, 0, krule);
 }
 
-void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
+void security_audit_rule_free(void **lsmrule)
 {
-	call_void_hook(audit_rule_free, lsmrule);
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_free, list) {
+		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+			continue;
+		hp->hook.audit_rule_free(lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot]);
+	}
 }
 
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule)
+int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void **lsmrule)
 {
-	return call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, secid, field, op, lsmrule);
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+	int rc;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_match, list) {
+		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+			continue;
+		rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(secid, field, op,
+					       &lsmrule[hp->lsmid->slot]);
+		if (rc)
+			return rc;
+	}
+	return 0;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
 
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 7f312714d96a..1c821bec7472 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -6929,6 +6929,11 @@ static int selinux_perf_event_write(struct perf_event *event)
 }
 #endif
 
+static struct lsm_id selinux_lsmid __lsm_ro_after_init = {
+	.lsm  = "selinux",
+	.slot = LSMBLOB_NEEDED
+};
+
 /*
  * IMPORTANT NOTE: When adding new hooks, please be careful to keep this order:
  * 1. any hooks that don't belong to (2.) or (3.) below,
@@ -7240,7 +7245,8 @@ static __init int selinux_init(void)
 
 	hashtab_cache_init();
 
-	security_add_hooks(selinux_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(selinux_hooks), "selinux");
+	security_add_hooks(selinux_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(selinux_hooks),
+			   &selinux_lsmid);
 
 	if (avc_add_callback(selinux_netcache_avc_callback, AVC_CALLBACK_RESET))
 		panic("SELinux: Unable to register AVC netcache callback\n");
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 4f9023f7f219..d4655dec2d70 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -4649,6 +4649,11 @@ struct lsm_blob_sizes smack_blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	.lbs_sock = sizeof(struct socket_smack),
 };
 
+static struct lsm_id smack_lsmid __lsm_ro_after_init = {
+	.lsm  = "smack",
+	.slot = LSMBLOB_NEEDED
+};
+
 static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_access_check, smack_ptrace_access_check),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_traceme, smack_ptrace_traceme),
@@ -4848,7 +4853,7 @@ static __init int smack_init(void)
 	/*
 	 * Register with LSM
 	 */
-	security_add_hooks(smack_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(smack_hooks), "smack");
+	security_add_hooks(smack_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(smack_hooks), &smack_lsmid);
 	smack_enabled = 1;
 
 	pr_info("Smack:  Initializing.\n");
diff --git a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
index f9adddc42ac8..e5848069af34 100644
--- a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
+++ b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
@@ -523,6 +523,11 @@ static void tomoyo_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
 	}
 }
 
+static struct lsm_id tomoyo_lsmid __lsm_ro_after_init = {
+	.lsm  = "tomoyo",
+	.slot = LSMBLOB_NOT_NEEDED
+};
+
 /*
  * tomoyo_security_ops is a "struct security_operations" which is used for
  * registering TOMOYO.
@@ -575,7 +580,8 @@ static int __init tomoyo_init(void)
 	struct tomoyo_task *s = tomoyo_task(current);
 
 	/* register ourselves with the security framework */
-	security_add_hooks(tomoyo_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(tomoyo_hooks), "tomoyo");
+	security_add_hooks(tomoyo_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(tomoyo_hooks),
+			   &tomoyo_lsmid);
 	pr_info("TOMOYO Linux initialized\n");
 	s->domain_info = &tomoyo_kernel_domain;
 	atomic_inc(&tomoyo_kernel_domain.users);
diff --git a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
index 536c99646f6a..c582757669f6 100644
--- a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
+++ b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
@@ -421,6 +421,11 @@ static int yama_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent)
 	return rc;
 }
 
+static struct lsm_id yama_lsmid __lsm_ro_after_init = {
+	.lsm  = "yama",
+	.slot = LSMBLOB_NOT_NEEDED
+};
+
 static struct security_hook_list yama_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_access_check, yama_ptrace_access_check),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_traceme, yama_ptrace_traceme),
@@ -477,7 +482,7 @@ static inline void yama_init_sysctl(void) { }
 static int __init yama_init(void)
 {
 	pr_info("Yama: becoming mindful.\n");
-	security_add_hooks(yama_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(yama_hooks), "yama");
+	security_add_hooks(yama_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(yama_hooks), &yama_lsmid);
 	yama_init_sysctl();
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.24.1

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-24 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200724203226.16374-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2020-07-24 20:32 ` [PATCH v19 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2020-07-27 16:12     ` [PATCH v19 02/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Stephen Smalley
2020-07-27 21:04       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 19:50     ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 04/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 10:34     ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 05/23] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 10:57     ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 06/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 11:11     ` John Johansen
2020-07-28 23:41       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-29  0:30         ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 07/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 11/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 12/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 13/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2020-07-27 20:36     ` James Morris
2020-07-27 20:40       ` John Johansen
2020-07-28 18:29     ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 14/23] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 15/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 20:13     ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 16/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2020-07-28 20:28     ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 17/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2020-07-27 20:37     ` James Morris
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 18/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 19/23] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2020-07-30  8:40     ` John Johansen
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 20/23] Audit: Add new record for multiple process LSM attributes Casey Schaufler
2020-07-27 19:04     ` Stephen Smalley
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 21/23] Audit: Add a new record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2020-07-27 20:40     ` James Morris
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2020-07-30 10:03     ` John Johansen
2020-07-30 20:44       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-30 20:57         ` John Johansen
2020-07-30 22:22           ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-24 20:32   ` [PATCH v19 23/23] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2020-07-30  9:23     ` John Johansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200724203226.16374-3-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).