linux-audit.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH] [v2] audit: avoid -Wempty-body warning
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:27:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322162807.679370-1-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

gcc warns about an empty statement when audit_remove_mark is defined to
nothing:

kernel/auditfilter.c: In function 'audit_data_to_entry':
kernel/auditfilter.c:609:51: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
  609 |                 audit_remove_mark(entry->rule.exe); /* that's the template one */
      |                                                   ^

Change the macros to use the usual "do { } while (0)" instead, and change a
few more that were (void)0, for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
v2: convert two more macros
---
 kernel/audit.h | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h
index 3b9c0945225a..1522e100fd17 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.h
+++ b/kernel/audit.h
@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ extern void audit_filter_inodes(struct task_struct *tsk,
 extern struct list_head *audit_killed_trees(void);
 #else /* CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL */
 #define auditsc_get_stamp(c, t, s) 0
-#define audit_put_watch(w) {}
-#define audit_get_watch(w) {}
+#define audit_put_watch(w) do { } while (0)
+#define audit_get_watch(w) do { } while (0)
 #define audit_to_watch(k, p, l, o) (-EINVAL)
 #define audit_add_watch(k, l) (-EINVAL)
 #define audit_remove_watch_rule(k) BUG()
@@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ extern struct list_head *audit_killed_trees(void);
 
 #define audit_alloc_mark(k, p, l) (ERR_PTR(-EINVAL))
 #define audit_mark_path(m) ""
-#define audit_remove_mark(m)
-#define audit_remove_mark_rule(k)
+#define audit_remove_mark(m) do { } while (0)
+#define audit_remove_mark_rule(k) do { } while (0)
 #define audit_mark_compare(m, i, d) 0
 #define audit_exe_compare(t, m) (-EINVAL)
 #define audit_dupe_exe(n, o) (-EINVAL)
@@ -311,8 +311,8 @@ extern struct list_head *audit_killed_trees(void);
 #define audit_remove_tree_rule(rule) BUG()
 #define audit_add_tree_rule(rule) -EINVAL
 #define audit_make_tree(rule, str, op) -EINVAL
-#define audit_trim_trees() (void)0
-#define audit_put_tree(tree) (void)0
+#define audit_trim_trees() do { } while (0)
+#define audit_put_tree(tree) do { } while (0)
 #define audit_tag_tree(old, new) -EINVAL
 #define audit_tree_path(rule) ""	/* never called */
 #define audit_kill_trees(context) BUG()
-- 
2.29.2


--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-22 16:27 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-03-22 18:00 ` [PATCH] [v2] audit: avoid -Wempty-body warning Richard Guy Briggs
2021-03-24 16:14 ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210322162807.679370-1-arnd@kernel.org \
    --to=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=jbi.octave@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).