linux-audit.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v28 20/25] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:47:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210722004758.12371-21-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210722004758.12371-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Verify that the tasks on the ends of a binder transaction
use the same "interface_lsm" security module. This prevents
confusion of security "contexts".

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 security/security.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 13ded9c55344..cb359e185d1a 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -859,9 +859,38 @@ int security_binder_set_context_mgr(struct task_struct *mgr)
 	return call_int_hook(binder_set_context_mgr, 0, mgr);
 }
 
+/**
+ * security_binder_transaction - Binder driver transaction check
+ * @from: source of the transaction
+ * @to: destination of the transaction
+ *
+ * Verify that the tasks have the same LSM "display", then
+ * call the security module hooks.
+ *
+ * Returns -EINVAL if the displays don't match, or the
+ * result of the security module checks.
+ */
 int security_binder_transaction(struct task_struct *from,
 				struct task_struct *to)
 {
+	int from_ilsm = lsm_task_ilsm(from);
+	int to_ilsm = lsm_task_ilsm(to);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the ilsm is LSMBLOB_INVALID the first module that has
+	 * an entry is used. This will be in the 0 slot.
+	 *
+	 * This is currently only required if the server has requested
+	 * peer contexts, but it would be unwieldly to have too much of
+	 * the binder driver detail here.
+	 */
+	if (from_ilsm == LSMBLOB_INVALID)
+		from_ilsm = 0;
+	if (to_ilsm == LSMBLOB_INVALID)
+		to_ilsm = 0;
+	if (from_ilsm != to_ilsm)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	return call_int_hook(binder_transaction, 0, from, to);
 }
 
-- 
2.31.1

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-22  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210722004758.12371-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2021-07-22  0:47 ` [PATCH v28 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 01/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 02/25] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 03/25] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 04/25] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 05/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 06/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 07/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 09/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 10/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 11/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 12/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-23 23:56     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 13/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 14/25] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 15/25] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 16/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 17/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 19/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 21/25] audit: support non-syscall auxiliary records Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 17:02     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  4:08     ` kernel test robot
2021-08-12 20:59     ` Paul Moore
2021-08-12 22:38       ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-13 15:31         ` Paul Moore
2021-08-13 18:48           ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-13 20:43             ` Paul Moore
2021-08-13 21:47               ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-16 18:57                 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-18 21:59                   ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-19  0:47                     ` Paul Moore
2021-08-19  0:56                       ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-19 22:41                         ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-20 19:06                           ` Paul Moore
2021-08-20 19:17                             ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-20 23:48                               ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-24 14:45                                 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-24 15:20                                   ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-24 16:14                                     ` Paul Moore
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 23/25] Audit: Add record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 24/25] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22  0:47   ` [PATCH v28 25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210722004758.12371-21-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).