linux-audit.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] apparmor: differentiate between subjective and objective task credentials
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 04:57:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28174118-93d2-e7a5-50fb-004185354625@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161377736385.87807.7033400948278183233.stgit@sifl>

On 2/19/21 3:29 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> With the split of the security_task_getsecid() into subjective and
> objective variants it's time to update AppArmor to ensure it is
> using the correct task creds.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

This has a couple problems, that I will work on addressing


> ---
>  security/apparmor/domain.c       |    2 +-
>  security/apparmor/include/cred.h |   19 ++++++++++++++++---
>  security/apparmor/include/task.h |    3 ++-
>  security/apparmor/lsm.c          |   23 +++++++++++++++--------
>  security/apparmor/task.c         |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>  5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
> index f919ebd042fd2..9ed00b8dcdf0c 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int may_change_ptraced_domain(struct aa_label *to_label,
>  	tracer = ptrace_parent(current);
>  	if (tracer)
>  		/* released below */
> -		tracerl = aa_get_task_label(tracer);
> +		tracerl = aa_get_task_label_subj(tracer);
>  
>  	/* not ptraced */
>  	if (!tracer || unconfined(tracerl))
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/cred.h b/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
> index 0b9ae4804ef73..43c21ef5568ab 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
> +++ b/security/apparmor/include/cred.h
> @@ -64,14 +64,27 @@ static inline struct aa_label *aa_get_newest_cred_label(const struct cred *cred)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * __aa_task_raw_label - retrieve another task's label
> + * __aa_task_raw_label_subj - retrieve another task's subjective label
>   * @task: task to query  (NOT NULL)
>   *
> - * Returns: @task's label without incrementing its ref count
> + * Returns: @task's subjective label without incrementing its ref count
>   *
>   * If @task != current needs to be called in RCU safe critical section
>   */
> -static inline struct aa_label *__aa_task_raw_label(struct task_struct *task)
> +static inline struct aa_label *__aa_task_raw_label_subj(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +	return aa_cred_raw_label(rcu_dereference(task->cred));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __aa_task_raw_label_obj - retrieve another task's objective label
> + * @task: task to query  (NOT NULL)
> + *
> + * Returns: @task's objective label without incrementing its ref count
> + *
> + * If @task != current needs to be called in RCU safe critical section
> + */
> +static inline struct aa_label *__aa_task_raw_label_obj(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
>  	return aa_cred_raw_label(__task_cred(task));
>  }
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/task.h b/security/apparmor/include/task.h
> index f13d12373b25e..27a2961558555 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/include/task.h
> +++ b/security/apparmor/include/task.h
> @@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ int aa_replace_current_label(struct aa_label *label);
>  int aa_set_current_onexec(struct aa_label *label, bool stack);
>  int aa_set_current_hat(struct aa_label *label, u64 token);
>  int aa_restore_previous_label(u64 cookie);
> -struct aa_label *aa_get_task_label(struct task_struct *task);
> +struct aa_label *aa_get_task_label_subj(struct task_struct *task);
> +struct aa_label *aa_get_task_label_obj(struct task_struct *task);
>  
>  /**
>   * aa_free_task_ctx - free a task_ctx
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> index 15e37b9132679..38430851675b9 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int apparmor_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child,
>  	int error;
>  
>  	tracer = __begin_current_label_crit_section();
> -	tracee = aa_get_task_label(child);
> +	tracee = aa_get_task_label_obj(child);
>  	error = aa_may_ptrace(tracer, tracee,
>  			(mode & PTRACE_MODE_READ) ? AA_PTRACE_READ
>  						  : AA_PTRACE_TRACE);
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int apparmor_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent)
>  	int error;
>  
>  	tracee = __begin_current_label_crit_section();
> -	tracer = aa_get_task_label(parent);
> +	tracer = aa_get_task_label_subj(parent);
>  	error = aa_may_ptrace(tracer, tracee, AA_PTRACE_TRACE);
>  	aa_put_label(tracer);
>  	__end_current_label_crit_section(tracee);
> @@ -719,9 +719,16 @@ static void apparmor_bprm_committed_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>  	return;
>  }
>  
> -static void apparmor_task_getsecid(struct task_struct *p, u32 *secid)
> +static void apparmor_task_getsecid_subj(struct task_struct *p, u32 *secid)
>  {
> -	struct aa_label *label = aa_get_task_label(p);
> +	struct aa_label *label = aa_get_task_label_subj(p);
> +	*secid = label->secid;
> +	aa_put_label(label);
> +}
> +
> +static void apparmor_task_getsecid_obj(struct task_struct *p, u32 *secid)
> +{
> +	struct aa_label *label = aa_get_task_label_obj(p);
>  	*secid = label->secid;
>  	aa_put_label(label);
>  }
> @@ -750,7 +757,7 @@ static int apparmor_task_kill(struct task_struct *target, struct kernel_siginfo
>  		 * Dealing with USB IO specific behavior
>  		 */
>  		cl = aa_get_newest_cred_label(cred);
> -		tl = aa_get_task_label(target);
> +		tl = aa_get_task_label_obj(target);
>  		error = aa_may_signal(cl, tl, sig);
>  		aa_put_label(cl);
>  		aa_put_label(tl);
> @@ -758,7 +765,7 @@ static int apparmor_task_kill(struct task_struct *target, struct kernel_siginfo
>  	}
>  
>  	cl = __begin_current_label_crit_section();
> -	tl = aa_get_task_label(target);
> +	tl = aa_get_task_label_obj(target);
>  	error = aa_may_signal(cl, tl, sig);
>  	aa_put_label(tl);
>  	__end_current_label_crit_section(cl);
> @@ -1243,8 +1250,8 @@ static struct security_hook_list apparmor_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
>  
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_free, apparmor_task_free),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_alloc, apparmor_task_alloc),
> -	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_getsecid_subj, apparmor_task_getsecid),
> -	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_getsecid_obj, apparmor_task_getsecid),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_getsecid_subj, apparmor_task_getsecid_subj),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_getsecid_obj, apparmor_task_getsecid_obj),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_setrlimit, apparmor_task_setrlimit),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_kill, apparmor_task_kill),
>  
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/task.c b/security/apparmor/task.c
> index d17130ee6795d..c03c8e3928055 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/task.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/task.c
> @@ -16,17 +16,34 @@
>  #include "include/task.h"
>  
>  /**
> - * aa_get_task_label - Get another task's label
> + * aa_get_task_label_subj - Get another task's subjective label
>   * @task: task to query  (NOT NULL)
>   *
>   * Returns: counted reference to @task's label
>   */
> -struct aa_label *aa_get_task_label(struct task_struct *task)
> +struct aa_label *aa_get_task_label_subj(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
>  	struct aa_label *p;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	p = aa_get_newest_label(__aa_task_raw_label(task));
> +	p = aa_get_newest_label(__aa_task_raw_label_subj(task));
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	return p;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * aa_get_task_label_obj - Get another task's objective label
> + * @task: task to query  (NOT NULL)
> + *
> + * Returns: counted reference to @task's label
> + */
> +struct aa_label *aa_get_task_label_obj(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +	struct aa_label *p;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	p = aa_get_newest_label(__aa_task_raw_label_obj(task));
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  
>  	return p;
> 

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-22 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-19 23:28 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Split security_task_getsecid() into subj and obj variants Paul Moore
2021-02-19 23:29 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] lsm: separate security_task_getsecid() into subjective and objective variants Paul Moore
2021-02-20  2:55   ` James Morris
2021-02-20 14:44     ` Paul Moore
2021-03-04 10:04       ` Jeffrey Vander Stoep
2021-03-04 23:43         ` Paul Moore
2021-03-10  8:21           ` Jeffrey Vander Stoep
2021-03-11  1:56             ` Paul Moore
2021-02-21 12:51   ` John Johansen
2021-02-21 22:09     ` Paul Moore
2021-03-04  0:44     ` Paul Moore
2021-03-10  0:28       ` Paul Moore
2021-03-10  3:09         ` John Johansen
2021-02-24 16:49   ` Mimi Zohar
2021-03-08 19:25   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-03-10  0:23     ` Paul Moore
2021-03-10  1:03   ` John Johansen
2021-03-11  1:55     ` Paul Moore
2021-02-19 23:29 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] selinux: clarify task subjective and objective credentials Paul Moore
2021-02-21 12:55   ` John Johansen
2021-03-08 19:26   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-03-10  3:05   ` John Johansen
2021-03-11  4:32     ` Paul Moore
2021-03-17 22:56       ` Paul Moore
2021-02-19 23:29 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] smack: differentiate between subjective and objective task credentials Paul Moore
2021-02-21 12:56   ` John Johansen
2021-03-08 19:26   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-03-10  1:04   ` John Johansen
2021-02-19 23:29 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2021-02-21 12:57   ` John Johansen [this message]
2021-02-21 22:12     ` Paul Moore
2021-02-20  1:49 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Split security_task_getsecid() into subj and obj variants Casey Schaufler
2021-02-20 14:41   ` Paul Moore
2021-02-22 23:58     ` Casey Schaufler
2021-02-23 14:14       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-02-24  0:03         ` Paul Moore
2021-03-04  0:46       ` Paul Moore
2021-03-04  2:21         ` Casey Schaufler
2021-03-04 23:41           ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28174118-93d2-e7a5-50fb-004185354625@canonical.com \
    --to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).