From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D0BC47088 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05C6613BD for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:33:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D05C6613BD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-45-1mG0v_XON3KQBV6GP5QXgw-1; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:33:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1mG0v_XON3KQBV6GP5QXgw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17D88015F5; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5AFB687E4; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01E1180B463; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 14QIvR3Z029892 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:57:27 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 2D7DC2062C00; Wed, 26 May 2021 18:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast04.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 255B02062BE9 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 18:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAAA9101D238 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 18:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-584-JYjulP2JNMSbttsFMXQnmw-1; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:57:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: JYjulP2JNMSbttsFMXQnmw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id b191so1329071wmd.1 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 11:57:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rlQbjBUFMuctbD9gTz3a+tlumdLhF9FCbMb8+cCOB90=; b=i8mLhUW1lrTmBSSgcamdeCHcK3/wa/CWINs59BU9YRc0Zn3QtEPFDUfNlDxySWUQJc KtkmQR2msF0gVUhiaSoMk6vPXqlDjonUnOMAV5Smuj89I6t7hIdtZayldQfw6uwZ8MrP wl4p3XSTVZ960JfKPaaN/8XoiXw+zA8PGCARwcAJL//ttAvruDdVGzaVrDOKDoXf1YdK s1Bp2Iz83dk/S93HgEuau9uGLxuhjlk9k8nurXn8wxURoq0Vyf7Rd2GSuZIxVOeItIZ6 P89/WLTI9JnpqqgoFvpMx71ZE636M2I3plcHEf9AC1hAMDFMvx0mNS2KHMrvFDlzUgip I6qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532XJXmeWI/NEqasFdlhJFBhiAyXdvrSpoQEnLFWoWjo39+vVK8E 0V+o6MAcTKaZM10dq5eKOwI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+lrqr3h6SL3T+Y6y/rw459koCz8xUVrAfa9dSXNty1R4e9/AOGc7yFXABdEB8NhCypCAPQA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2056:: with SMTP id p22mr4946996wmg.146.1622055435424; Wed, 26 May 2021 11:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.8.197] ([85.255.236.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm7799148wmi.32.2021.05.26.11.57.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 May 2021 11:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] audit,io_uring,io-wq: add some basic audit support to io_uring To: Paul Moore , Jens Axboe References: <162163367115.8379.8459012634106035341.stgit@sifl> <162163379461.8379.9691291608621179559.stgit@sifl> <162219f9-7844-0c78-388f-9b5c06557d06@gmail.com> <8943629d-3c69-3529-ca79-d7f8e2c60c16@kernel.dk> <9e69e4b6-2b87-a688-d604-c7f70be894f5@kernel.dk> <3bef7c8a-ee70-d91d-74db-367ad0137d00@kernel.dk> From: Pavel Begunkov Message-ID: <45688a09-7489-f524-e5ac-e614437f08ea@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 19:57:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.6 X-loop: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 26 May 2021 15:32:53 -0400 Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro X-BeenThere: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Linux Audit Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/26/21 7:44 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 2:01 PM Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 5/26/21 11:54 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 5/26/21 11:31 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> On 5/26/21 11:15 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>>> On 5/25/21 8:04 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 9:11 PM Jens Axboe wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/24/21 1:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>>>>>>> That said, audit is not for everyone, and we have build time and >>>>>>>> runtime options to help make life easier. Beyond simply disabling >>>>>>>> audit at compile time a number of Linux distributions effectively >>>>>>>> shortcut audit at runtime by adding a "never" rule to the audit >>>>>>>> filter, for example: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> % auditctl -a task,never >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As has been brought up, the issue we're facing is that distros have >>>>>>> CONFIG_AUDIT=y and hence the above is the best real world case outside >>>>>>> of people doing custom kernels. My question would then be how much >>>>>>> overhead the above will add, considering it's an entry/exit call per op. >>>>>>> If auditctl is turned off, what is the expectation in turns of overhead? >>>>>> >>>>>> I commented on that case in my last email to Pavel, but I'll try to go >>>>>> over it again in a little more detail. >>>>>> >>>>>> As we discussed earlier in this thread, we can skip the req->opcode >>>>>> check before both the _entry and _exit calls, so we are left with just >>>>>> the bare audit calls in the io_uring code. As the _entry and _exit >>>>>> functions are small, I've copied them and their supporting functions >>>>>> below and I'll try to explain what would happen in CONFIG_AUDIT=y, >>>>>> "task,never" case. >>>>>> >>>>>> + static inline struct audit_context *audit_context(void) >>>>>> + { >>>>>> + return current->audit_context; >>>>>> + } >>>>>> >>>>>> + static inline bool audit_dummy_context(void) >>>>>> + { >>>>>> + void *p = audit_context(); >>>>>> + return !p || *(int *)p; >>>>>> + } >>>>>> >>>>>> + static inline void audit_uring_entry(u8 op) >>>>>> + { >>>>>> + if (unlikely(audit_enabled && audit_context())) >>>>>> + __audit_uring_entry(op); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> >>>>>> We have one if statement where the conditional checks on two >>>>>> individual conditions. The first (audit_enabled) is simply a check to >>>>>> see if anyone has "turned on" auditing at runtime; historically this >>>>>> worked rather well, and still does in a number of places, but ever >>>>>> since systemd has taken to forcing audit on regardless of the admin's >>>>>> audit configuration it is less useful. The second (audit_context()) >>>>>> is a check to see if an audit_context has been allocated for the >>>>>> current task. In the case of "task,never" current->audit_context will >>>>>> be NULL (see audit_alloc()) and the __audit_uring_entry() slowpath >>>>>> will never be called. >>>>>> >>>>>> Worst case here is checking the value of audit_enabled and >>>>>> current->audit_context. Depending on which you think is more likely >>>>>> we can change the order of the check so that the >>>>>> current->audit_context check is first if you feel that is more likely >>>>>> to be NULL than audit_enabled is to be false (it may be that way now). >>>>>> >>>>>> + static inline void audit_uring_exit(int success, long code) >>>>>> + { >>>>>> + if (unlikely(!audit_dummy_context())) >>>>>> + __audit_uring_exit(success, code); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> >>>>>> The exit call is very similar to the entry call, but in the >>>>>> "task,never" case it is very simple as the first check to be performed >>>>>> is the current->audit_context check which we know to be NULL. The >>>>>> __audit_uring_exit() slowpath will never be called. >>>>> >>>>> I actually ran some numbers this morning. The test base is 5.13+, and >>>>> CONFIG_AUDIT=y and CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL=y is set for both the baseline >>>>> test and the test with this series applied. I used your git branch as of >>>>> this morning. >>>>> >>>>> The test case is my usual peak perf test, which is random reads at >>>>> QD=128 and using polled IO. It's a single core test, not threaded. I ran >>>>> two different tests - one was having a thread just do the IO, the other >>>>> is using SQPOLL to do the IO for us. The device is capable than more >>>>> IOPS than a single core can deliver, so we're CPU limited in this test. >>>>> Hence it's a good test case as it does actual work, and shows software >>>>> overhead quite nicely. Runs are very stable (less than 0.5% difference >>>>> between runs on the same base), yet I did average 4 runs. >>>>> >>>>> Kernel SQPOLL IOPS Perf diff >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> 5.13 0 3029872 0.0% >>>>> 5.13 1 3031056 0.0% >>>>> 5.13 + audit 0 2894160 -4.5% >>>>> 5.13 + audit 1 2886168 -4.8% >>>>> >>>>> That's an immediate drop in perf of almost 5%. Looking at a quick >>>>> profile of it (nothing fancy, just checking for 'audit' in the profile) >>>>> shows this: >>>>> >>>>> + 2.17% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __audit_uring_entry >>>>> + 0.71% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __audit_uring_exit >>>>> 0.07% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __audit_syscall_entry >>>>> 0.02% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __audit_syscall_exit >>>>> >>>>> Note that this is with _no_ rules! >>>> >>>> io_uring also supports a NOP command, which basically just measures >>>> reqs/sec through the interface. Ran that as well: >>>> >>>> Kernel SQPOLL IOPS Perf diff >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> 5.13 0 31.05M 0.0% >>>> 5.13 + audit 0 25.31M -18.5% >>>> >>>> and profile for the latter includes: >>>> >>>> + 5.19% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __audit_uring_entry >>>> + 4.31% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __audit_uring_exit >>>> 0.26% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __audit_syscall_entry >>>> 0.08% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __audit_syscall_exit >>> >>> As Pavel correctly pointed it, looks like auditing is enabled. And >>> indeed it was! Hence the above numbers is without having turned off >>> auditing. Running the NOPs after having turned off audit, we get 30.6M >>> IOPS, which is down about 1.5% from the baseline. The results for the >>> polled random read test above did _not_ change from this, they are still >>> down the same amount. >>> >>> Note, and I should have included this in the first email, this is not >>> any kind of argument for or against audit logging. It's purely meant to >>> be a set of numbers that show how the current series impacts >>> performance. >> >> And finally, just checking if we make it optional per opcode if we see >> any real impact, and the answer is no. Using the below patch which >> effectively bypasses audit calls unless the opcode has flagged the need >> to do so, I cannot measure any difference in perf (as expected). >> >> To turn this into something useful, my suggestion as a viable path >> forward would be: >> >> 1) Use something like the below patch and flag request types that we >> want to do audit logging for. >> >> 2) As Pavel suggested, eliminate the need for having both and entry/exit >> hook, turning it into just one. That effectively cuts the number of >> checks and calls in half. > > I suspect the updated working-io_uring branch with HEAD at > 1f25193a3f54 (updated a short time ago, see my last email in this > thread) will improve performance. Also, as has been mention several See the email you replied to, ~1.5% was basically an overhead of two `if (io_op_defs[req->opcode].audit)` in case of nops, where at least once req->opcode is cached. But to be completely fair, misses unlikely -- Pavel Begunkov -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit