linux-audit.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To: "deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com"
	<deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	 "agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"ebiggers@kernel.org" <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	"tytso@mit.edu" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"paul@paul-moore.com" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	"eparis@redhat.com" <eparis@redhat.com>,
	"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"serge@hallyn.com" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jannh@google.com" <jannh@google.com>,
	"linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"linux-audit@redhat.com" <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
	"tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com" <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v7 11/16] ipe: add support for dm-verity as a trust provider
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 09:37:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <721462c3da064d359ca3c83845298ccf@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1634151995-16266-12-git-send-email-deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>

> From: deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com
> [mailto:deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 9:07 PM
> From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Allows author of IPE policy to indicate trust for a singular dm-verity
> volume, identified by roothash, through "dmverity_roothash" and all
> signed dm-verity volumes, through "dmverity_signature".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> 
> Relevant changes since v6:
>   * Squash patch 08/12, 10/12 to [11/16]
> 
> ---
>  security/ipe/eval.c                       |  5 ++
>  security/ipe/eval.h                       | 10 +++
>  security/ipe/hooks.c                      | 48 ++++++++++++++
>  security/ipe/hooks.h                      |  6 ++
>  security/ipe/ipe.c                        |  9 +++
>  security/ipe/ipe.h                        |  3 +
>  security/ipe/modules/Kconfig              | 23 +++++++
>  security/ipe/modules/Makefile             |  2 +
>  security/ipe/modules/dmverity_roothash.c  | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  security/ipe/modules/dmverity_signature.c | 25 +++++++
>  10 files changed, 211 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 security/ipe/modules/dmverity_roothash.c
>  create mode 100644 security/ipe/modules/dmverity_signature.c
> 
> diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.c b/security/ipe/eval.c
> index 361efccebad4..facc05c753f4 100644
> --- a/security/ipe/eval.c
> +++ b/security/ipe/eval.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static struct super_block *pinned_sb;
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pin_lock);
> 
>  #define FILE_SUPERBLOCK(f) ((f)->f_path.mnt->mnt_sb)
> +#define FILE_BLOCK_DEV(f) (FILE_SUPERBLOCK(f)->s_bdev)
> 
>  /**
>   * pin_sb: pin the underlying superblock of @f, marking it as trusted
> @@ -95,6 +96,10 @@ static struct ipe_eval_ctx *build_ctx(const struct file *file,
>  	ctx->hook = hook;
>  	ctx->ci_ctx = ipe_current_ctx();
>  	ctx->from_init_sb = from_pinned(file);
> +	if (file) {
> +		if (FILE_BLOCK_DEV(file))
> +			ctx->ipe_bdev = ipe_bdev(FILE_BLOCK_DEV(file));
> +	}
> 
>  	return ctx;
>  }
> diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.h b/security/ipe/eval.h
> index 42fb7fdf2599..25d2d8d55702 100644
> --- a/security/ipe/eval.h
> +++ b/security/ipe/eval.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,14 @@
>  #include "hooks.h"
>  #include "policy.h"
> 
> +struct ipe_bdev {
> +	const u8       *sigdata;
> +	size_t		siglen;
> +
> +	const u8       *hash;
> +	size_t		hashlen;
> +};
> +
>  struct ipe_eval_ctx {
>  	enum ipe_hook hook;
>  	enum ipe_operation op;
> @@ -20,6 +28,8 @@ struct ipe_eval_ctx {
>  	const struct file *file;
>  	struct ipe_context *ci_ctx;
> 
> +	const struct ipe_bdev *ipe_bdev;
> +
>  	bool from_init_sb;
>  };
> 
> diff --git a/security/ipe/hooks.c b/security/ipe/hooks.c
> index 2d4a4f0eead0..470fb48e490c 100644
> --- a/security/ipe/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/ipe/hooks.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/refcount.h>
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/blk_types.h>
>  #include <linux/binfmts.h>
>  #include <linux/mman.h>
> 
> @@ -219,3 +220,50 @@ void ipe_sb_free_security(struct super_block *mnt_sb)
>  {
>  	ipe_invalidate_pinned_sb(mnt_sb);
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * ipe_bdev_free_security: free nested structures within IPE's LSM blob
> + *			   in block_devices
> + * @bdev: Supplies a pointer to a block_device that contains the structure
> + *	  to free.
> + */
> +void ipe_bdev_free_security(struct block_device *bdev)
> +{
> +	struct ipe_bdev *blob = ipe_bdev(bdev);
> +
> +	kfree(blob->sigdata);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * ipe_bdev_setsecurity: associate some data from the block device layer
> + *			 with IPE's LSM blob.
> + * @bdev: Supplies a pointer to a block_device that contains the LSM blob.
> + * @key: Supplies the string key that uniquely identifies the value.
> + * @value: Supplies the value to store.
> + * @len: The length of @value.
> + */
> +int ipe_bdev_setsecurity(struct block_device *bdev, const char *key,
> +			 const void *value, size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct ipe_bdev *blob = ipe_bdev(bdev);
> +
> +	if (!strcmp(key, DM_VERITY_SIGNATURE_SEC_NAME)) {
> +		blob->siglen = len;
> +		blob->sigdata = kmemdup(value, len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!blob->sigdata)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!strcmp(key, DM_VERITY_ROOTHASH_SEC_NAME)) {
> +		blob->hashlen = len;
> +		blob->hash = kmemdup(value, len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!blob->hash)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> diff --git a/security/ipe/hooks.h b/security/ipe/hooks.h
> index e7f107ab5620..285f35187188 100644
> --- a/security/ipe/hooks.h
> +++ b/security/ipe/hooks.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>  #include <linux/binfmts.h>
>  #include <linux/security.h>
> +#include <linux/device-mapper.h>
> 
>  enum ipe_hook {
>  	ipe_hook_exec = 0,
> @@ -40,4 +41,9 @@ int ipe_on_kernel_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id
> id, bool contents);
> 
>  void ipe_sb_free_security(struct super_block *mnt_sb);
> 
> +void ipe_bdev_free_security(struct block_device *bdev);
> +
> +int ipe_bdev_setsecurity(struct block_device *bdev, const char *key,
> +			 const void *value, size_t len);
> +
>  #endif /* IPE_HOOKS_H */
> diff --git a/security/ipe/ipe.c b/security/ipe/ipe.c
> index 1382d50078ec..215936cb4574 100644
> --- a/security/ipe/ipe.c
> +++ b/security/ipe/ipe.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include "ipe_parser.h"
>  #include "modules/ipe_module.h"
>  #include "modules.h"
> +#include "eval.h"
> 
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
> @@ -20,8 +21,14 @@
> 
>  struct lsm_blob_sizes ipe_blobs __lsm_ro_after_init = {
>  	.lbs_task = sizeof(struct ipe_context __rcu *),
> +	.lbs_bdev = sizeof(struct ipe_bdev),
>  };
> 
> +struct ipe_bdev *ipe_bdev(struct block_device *b)
> +{
> +	return b->security + ipe_blobs.lbs_bdev;
> +}
> +
>  static struct security_hook_list ipe_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_alloc, ipe_task_alloc),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_free, ipe_task_free),
> @@ -31,6 +38,8 @@ static struct security_hook_list ipe_hooks[]
> __lsm_ro_after_init = {
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(kernel_read_file, ipe_on_kernel_read),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(kernel_load_data, ipe_on_kernel_load_data),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sb_free_security, ipe_sb_free_security),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bdev_free_security, ipe_bdev_free_security),
> +	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bdev_setsecurity, ipe_bdev_setsecurity),
>  };
> 
>  /**
> diff --git a/security/ipe/ipe.h b/security/ipe/ipe.h
> index ad16d2bebfec..6b4c7e07f204 100644
> --- a/security/ipe/ipe.h
> +++ b/security/ipe/ipe.h
> @@ -14,10 +14,13 @@
> 
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/blk_types.h>
>  #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
> 
>  extern struct lsm_blob_sizes ipe_blobs;
>  extern struct ipe_parser __start_ipe_parsers[], __end_ipe_parsers[];
>  extern struct ipe_module __start_ipe_modules[], __end_ipe_modules[];
> 
> +struct ipe_bdev *ipe_bdev(struct block_device *b);
> +
>  #endif /* IPE_H */
> diff --git a/security/ipe/modules/Kconfig b/security/ipe/modules/Kconfig
> index fad96ba534e2..a6ea06cf0737 100644
> --- a/security/ipe/modules/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/ipe/modules/Kconfig
> @@ -16,5 +16,28 @@ config IPE_PROP_BOOT_VERIFIED
> 
>  	  If unsure, answer N.
> 
> +config IPE_PROP_DM_VERITY_SIGNATURE
> +	bool "Enable support for signed dm-verity volumes"
> +	depends on DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG
> +	default Y
> +	help
> +	  This option enables the property 'dmverity_signature' in
> +	  IPE policy. This property evaluates to TRUE when a file
> +	  is evaluated against a dm-verity volume that was mounted
> +	  with a signed root-hash.
> +
> +	  If unsure, answer Y.
> +
> +config IPE_PROP_DM_VERITY_ROOTHASH
> +	bool "Enable support for dm-verity volumes"
> +	depends on DM_VERITY
> +	default Y
> +	help
> +	  This option enables the property 'dmverity_roothash' in
> +	  IPE policy. This property evaluates to TRUE when a file
> +	  is evaluated against a dm-verity volume whose root hash
> +	  matches the supplied value.
> +
> +	  If unsure, answer Y.
> 
>  endmenu
> diff --git a/security/ipe/modules/Makefile b/security/ipe/modules/Makefile
> index e0045ec65434..84fadce85193 100644
> --- a/security/ipe/modules/Makefile
> +++ b/security/ipe/modules/Makefile
> @@ -6,3 +6,5 @@
>  #
> 
>  obj-$(CONFIG_IPE_PROP_BOOT_VERIFIED) += boot_verified.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_IPE_PROP_DM_VERITY_SIGNATURE) += dmverity_signature.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_IPE_PROP_DM_VERITY_ROOTHASH) += dmverity_roothash.o
> diff --git a/security/ipe/modules/dmverity_roothash.c
> b/security/ipe/modules/dmverity_roothash.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0f82bec3b842
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/security/ipe/modules/dmverity_roothash.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#include "ipe_module.h"
> +
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct counted_array {
> +	size_t	len;
> +	u8     *data;
> +};
> +
> +static int dvrh_parse(const char *valstr, void **value)
> +{
> +	int rv = 0;
> +	struct counted_array *arr;
> +
> +	arr = kzalloc(sizeof(*arr), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!arr) {
> +		rv = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	arr->len = (strlen(valstr) / 2);
> +
> +	arr->data = kzalloc(arr->len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!arr->data) {
> +		rv = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	rv = hex2bin(arr->data, valstr, arr->len);
> +	if (rv != 0)
> +		goto err2;
> +
> +	*value = arr;
> +	return rv;
> +err2:
> +	kfree(arr->data);
> +err:
> +	kfree(arr);
> +	return rv;
> +}
> +
> +static bool dvrh_eval(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *ctx, const void *val)
> +{
> +	const u8 *src;
> +	struct counted_array *expect = (struct counted_array *)val;
> +
> +	if (!ctx->ipe_bdev)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (ctx->ipe_bdev->hashlen != expect->len)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	src = ctx->ipe_bdev->hash;
> +
> +	return !memcmp(expect->data, src, expect->len);

Hi Deven

I was curious to see if determining the property at run-time
could apply also to dm-verity. It seems it could be done
(I omit some checks, I also keep the expected value in hex
format):

---
        md = dm_get_md(file_inode(ctx->file)->i_sb->s_dev);
        table = dm_get_live_table(md, &srcu_idx);
        num_targets = dm_table_get_num_targets(table);

        for (i = 0; i < num_targets; i++) {
                struct dm_target *ti = dm_table_get_target(table, i);

                if (strcmp(ti->type->name, "verity"))
                        continue;

                ti->type->status(ti, STATUSTYPE_IMA, 0, result, sizeof(result));
        }

        dm_put_live_table(md, srcu_idx);
        dm_put(md);

        root_digest_ptr = strstr(result, "root_digest=");
        return !strncmp(expect->data, root_digest_ptr + 12, expect->len);
---

Only dm_table_get_target() is not exported yet, but I guess it could
be. dm_table_get_num_targets() is exported.

With this code, you would not have to manage security blobs
outside IPE. Maybe you could add a blob for the super block, so
that you verify the dm-verity property just once per filesystem.

Roberto

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Zhong Ronghua

> +}
> +
> +static int dvrh_free(void **val)
> +{
> +	struct counted_array *expect = (struct counted_array *)val;
> +
> +	kfree(expect->data);
> +	kfree(expect);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +IPE_MODULE(dvrh) = {
> +	.name = "dmverity_roothash",
> +	.version = 1,
> +	.parse = dvrh_parse,
> +	.free = dvrh_free,
> +	.eval = dvrh_eval,
> +};
> diff --git a/security/ipe/modules/dmverity_signature.c
> b/security/ipe/modules/dmverity_signature.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..08746fcbcb3e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/security/ipe/modules/dmverity_signature.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#include "ipe_module.h"
> +
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +static bool dvv_eval(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *ctx, const void *val)
> +{
> +	bool expect = (bool)val;
> +	bool eval = ctx->ipe_bdev && (!!ctx->ipe_bdev->sigdata);
> +
> +	return expect == eval;
> +}
> +
> +IPE_MODULE(dvv) = {
> +	.name = "dmverity_signature",
> +	.version = 1,
> +	.parse = ipe_bool_parse,
> +	.free = NULL,
> +	.eval = dvv_eval,
> +};
> --
> 2.33.0


--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-25 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-13 19:06 [RFC PATCH v7 00/16] Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE) deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/16] security: add ipe lsm & initial context creation deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/16] ipe: add policy parser deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/16] ipe: add evaluation loop deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/16] ipe: add userspace interface deven.desai
2021-11-03  9:42   ` Roberto Sassu
2021-11-04 16:50     ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/16] ipe: add LSM hooks on execution and kernel read deven.desai
2021-10-13 20:04   ` Casey Schaufler
2021-10-15 19:25     ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-25 12:22   ` Roberto Sassu
2021-10-26 19:03     ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-27  8:56       ` Roberto Sassu
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/16] uapi|audit: add trust audit message definitions deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/16] ipe: add auditing support deven.desai
2021-10-13 20:02   ` Steve Grubb
2021-10-15 19:25     ` Deven Bowers
2021-11-02 19:44       ` Steve Grubb
2021-11-04 16:59         ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-13 22:54   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-10-15 19:25     ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-15 19:50       ` Randy Dunlap
2021-10-26 19:03         ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/16] ipe: add permissive toggle deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/16] ipe: introduce 'boot_verified' as a trust provider deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/16] fs|dm-verity: add block_dev LSM blob and submit dm-verity data deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/16] ipe: add support for dm-verity as a trust provider deven.desai
2021-11-25  9:37   ` Roberto Sassu [this message]
2021-11-30 18:55     ` Deven Bowers
2021-12-01 16:37       ` [RFC][PATCH] device mapper: Add builtin function dm_get_status() Roberto Sassu
2021-12-01 16:43         ` Roberto Sassu
2021-12-02  7:20         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-02  7:59           ` Roberto Sassu
2021-12-02  8:44             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-02  9:29               ` Roberto Sassu
2021-12-03  6:52                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-03 10:20                   ` Roberto Sassu
2021-12-06 10:57                     ` Roberto Sassu
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/16] fsverity|security: add security hooks to fsverity digest and signature deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:24   ` Eric Biggers
2021-10-15 19:25     ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-15 20:11       ` Eric Biggers
2021-10-20 15:08         ` Roberto Sassu
2021-10-22 16:31           ` Roberto Sassu
2021-10-26 19:03             ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-27  8:41               ` Roberto Sassu
2021-10-26 19:03         ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-27  9:34           ` Roberto Sassu
2021-10-28  3:48           ` Eric Biggers
2021-10-28 18:11             ` Deven Bowers
2021-11-03 12:28       ` Roberto Sassu
2021-11-04 17:12         ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/16] ipe: enable support for fs-verity as a trust provider deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/16] scripts: add boot policy generation program deven.desai
2021-11-03 16:43   ` Roberto Sassu
2021-11-03 16:53     ` Roberto Sassu
2021-11-04 16:52       ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/16] ipe: kunit tests deven.desai
2021-10-13 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/16] documentation: add ipe documentation deven.desai
2021-10-25 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH v7 00/16] Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE) Roberto Sassu
2021-10-26 19:03   ` Deven Bowers
2021-10-27  8:26     ` Roberto Sassu
2021-10-28 20:36       ` Deven Bowers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=721462c3da064d359ca3c83845298ccf@huawei.com \
    --to=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).