linux-audit.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak122 v1] audit: store event sockaddr in case of no rules
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 20:11:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQUiqkeygtEWAa=j8Dxysh_jSWhf33CYo7i2Tij26FH2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2a183b2-35f4-8493-c485-8bf86e5866e9@schaufler-ca.com>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 7:09 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> ... but it does appear that I could switch to using your audit_alloc_local().

In my opinion, linking the audit container ID and LSM stacking
patchsets would seem like a very big mistake, especially since the
consolidation you are describing could be done after the fact without
any disruption to the kernel/userspace interface.  I would strongly
encourage both patchsets to remain self-contained if at all possible
so as to not jeopardize each other.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-14  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-03 17:17 [PATCH ghak122 v1] audit: store event sockaddr in case of no rules Richard Guy Briggs
2020-07-08 22:49 ` Paul Moore
2020-07-13 17:40   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2020-07-13 17:55     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-13 20:02       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2020-07-13 23:08         ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-14  0:11           ` Paul Moore [this message]
2020-07-14  0:28             ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-14  0:47               ` Paul Moore
2020-07-14  1:08             ` Richard Guy Briggs
2020-07-14  1:19               ` Paul Moore
2020-07-14  2:37                 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-07-13 22:30     ` Paul Moore
2020-07-13 22:37       ` Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHC9VhQUiqkeygtEWAa=j8Dxysh_jSWhf33CYo7i2Tij26FH2w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).