linux-audit.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] audit: log AUDIT_TIME_* records only from rules
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 11:15:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRzr=0_ZQE47RTYvNqQHezkNgry_p08NAHSmixMVxGh7Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211104215313.GJ1550715@madcap2.tricolour.ca>

On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:53 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2021-11-04 17:29, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:00 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > AUDIT_TIME_* events are generated when there are syscall rules present that are
> > > not related to time keeping.  This will produce noisy log entries that could
> > > flood the logs and hide events we really care about.
> > >
> > > Rather than immediately produce the AUDIT_TIME_* records, store the data and
> > > log it at syscall exit time respecting the filter rules.
> > >
> > > Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991919
> >
> > Unfortunately that URL isn't publicly accessible.  It might be helpful
> > to simply add the relevant information to the commit description[1]
> > and omit the link entirely.  Since this is just an RFC, please don't
> > resend the patch just to include that information, you can simply
> > reply to this thread with the additional info.
>
> Hmmm, sorry about that.  There isn't really anything in that bz that
> shouldn't be public, but I'll check before openning it up...
>
> Basically it was a report that:
> TIME_ADJNTPVAL audit events are not generated if there are no syscalls
> rules, but that these events are generated when at least one unrelated
> syscall rule is added.
>
> This behaviour was confirmed but the conclusion about what should be the
> correct behaviour differed from that of the reporter.

I'm still wondering about the best way to handle this situation, and I
want to make sure I'm understanding the problem correctly.  So I'm
clear on the problem, is the issue that the AUDIT_TIME records are
being generated whenever at least one syscall filter is present,
regardless of if that syscall is time related?  With the expected
behavior being that AUDIT_TIME records are only generated when a time
related syscall is being audited?

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-19 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-04 20:59 [RFC PATCH v1] audit: log AUDIT_TIME_* records only from rules Richard Guy Briggs
2021-11-04 21:29 ` Paul Moore
2021-11-04 21:53   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-11-19 16:15     ` Paul Moore [this message]
2021-11-19 18:01       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-11-24 15:44         ` Paul Moore
2021-12-21 20:50           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-12-23 17:38             ` Paul Moore
2021-12-24 14:21               ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-12-27 15:07                 ` Paul Moore
2021-12-29 22:51 ` Paul Moore
2022-01-12 21:06   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-01-12 21:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-01-20 23:07     ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHC9VhRzr=0_ZQE47RTYvNqQHezkNgry_p08NAHSmixMVxGh7Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).