From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4AEC388F9 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C044222E9 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:31:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2C044222E9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=paul-moore.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-163-Qlur2DMFNvaHLR1RM1EQcQ-1; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:31:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Qlur2DMFNvaHLR1RM1EQcQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0188C180471E; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC0C65D9EF; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E8C5810D; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 09S1QWeB027168 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:26:32 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 38C312011569; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast01.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.17]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32E29201156B for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E133E85828D for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-f65.google.com (mail-ej1-f65.google.com [209.85.218.65]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-273-Ssf2ecIAM4iy_z5M9zWxdA-1; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:26:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Ssf2ecIAM4iy_z5M9zWxdA-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f65.google.com with SMTP id p9so4927505eji.4 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:26:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0jVxeGv6lE9HxG3ioZ1jNMfiO7oQfXoYg0ePUwTMDgQ=; b=C37H5gFN94RK4GFe/fkmTsuoYD4nFYoFLR0Rd/T/sQchzePgANlH2wyU84eFME7cVD ZVSKkRHol6vi/OYfH0HD0JZu2a24uubE6dznNTyAQnm+50VVlHsl99VlzAM9VsEvG0zT 9U1STUZn8Aur3kbRcuO+XhRQl62vaPiL1zRrCzTuEg2h+R32oqIsBOB/SNQas+TONMwd 7fuPON0UyrrNWW7YesTEcZs6RXD2NhMb8I13rQUvutDcohx2o7ggoxMJ7w9RSNIP7oF9 o80fUbUHAO+DpytBW26SK2z5Vjk/KB/v/7BcgxWo8HAF1thomnFvDsp0QO9Swcsikdk4 XtFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Sq+hlKkLxLSnkLo9FfJisI4J6RTDAq8nF9hIUocpF0A3pXE3j BJ2maCQPZw7JLlazjkHwHU1svzrHYIztjMqmuz/glGuu6g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwEzZ6iuiYaqP3D8WgJUCMcZ88Ip3ZyPs/mRAVgBH9lthbImUjuYFxHiRFl7WkTjg/dMh67mJNU6KVwr/0CDdc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:af87:: with SMTP id mj7mr5178601ejb.178.1603848385218; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:26:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7081a5b9c7d2e8085c49cec2fa72fcbb0b25e0d7.1600778472.git.rgb@redhat.com> <20200923144852.GK822320@madcap2.tricolour.ca> In-Reply-To: From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:26:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak120 V5] audit: trigger accompanying records when no rules present To: Richard Guy Briggs X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-loop: linux-audit@redhat.com Cc: Linux Security Module list , Linux-Audit Mailing List , LKML X-BeenThere: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Linux Audit Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 1:47 PM Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:49 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > On 2020-09-23 10:29, Paul Moore wrote: > > > I've gone over this revision a couple of times now and it looks okay, > > > but past experience is whispering in my ear that perhaps this is > > > better to wait on this for the next cycle so it gets a full set of > > > -rcX releases. Thoughts? > > > > I thought I had lots of time since we were just at the end of the > > previous cycle when this failed the previous time... Ran out yet > > again... (there were two weeks of PTO and a devel system rebuild in > > there somewhere...) > > We are at -rc6 and assuming v5.9 is released after -rc7 that would > give this roughly a week and a half in v5.9-rcX; considering the > history of this patch (reverted, obvious problems in development) I'm > not confident -rc6 provides enough soak time (even if we go to -rc8 I > remain skeptical). In addition, we've got a history of not taking new > work that isn't a bug-fix past the -rc5/-rc6 timeframe. This is why > I'm debating holding this until after the merge window. > > > It isn't my call. > > I asked for your thoughts on the matter, surely you have the liberty > to comment on your own opinion :) I never heard back on this, but the patch is in audit/next now. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit