* Quick announcement on the selinux/next and audit/next branches
@ 2021-03-05 2:03 Paul Moore
2021-03-05 17:56 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2021-03-05 2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: selinux, linux-audit
Hello all,
As many of you are aware, normally with the close of the merge window
and the release of -rc1 I typically reset the selinux/next and
audit/next branches to Linus' -rc1 tag. However, as you may have
heard already, there is a nasty problem with the early v5.12 kernels,
including -rc1, which could result in some fairly serious fs
corruption (see the LWN article below). With that in mind, I'm not
going to reset the selinux/next and audit/next branches for this
development cycle, leaving them based on v5.11-rc2+patches (basically
the current stable-5.12 branches in each tree). I don't expect this
to be a problem, but if necessary we can always rebase the -next
branches to -rc2 if it proves safe.
* https://lwn.net/Articles/848265
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Quick announcement on the selinux/next and audit/next branches
2021-03-05 2:03 Quick announcement on the selinux/next and audit/next branches Paul Moore
@ 2021-03-05 17:56 ` Paul Moore
2021-03-06 15:00 ` Richard Guy Briggs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2021-03-05 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: selinux, linux-audit
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:03 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> As many of you are aware, normally with the close of the merge window
> and the release of -rc1 I typically reset the selinux/next and
> audit/next branches to Linus' -rc1 tag. However, as you may have
> heard already, there is a nasty problem with the early v5.12 kernels,
> including -rc1, which could result in some fairly serious fs
> corruption (see the LWN article below). With that in mind, I'm not
> going to reset the selinux/next and audit/next branches for this
> development cycle ...
That idea was spectacularly short lived :/ Assuming -rc2 fixes the
swapfile bug, I'll plan on rebasing both -next branches to -rc2 early
next week. This should have zero impact on the audit tree (audit/next
is current empty), and a minimal impact on the selinux/next branch as
we only have one small patch in there at the moment.
If for some reason this causes anyone a problem due to merge
conflicts, you can still submit your patches (assuming they apply
cleanly to the stable-5.12 branch) and I'll take care of the conflict.
Thanks for your understanding.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Quick announcement on the selinux/next and audit/next branches
2021-03-05 17:56 ` Paul Moore
@ 2021-03-06 15:00 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-03-06 15:20 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Guy Briggs @ 2021-03-06 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: selinux, linux-audit
On 2021-03-05 12:56, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:03 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > As many of you are aware, normally with the close of the merge window
> > and the release of -rc1 I typically reset the selinux/next and
> > audit/next branches to Linus' -rc1 tag. However, as you may have
> > heard already, there is a nasty problem with the early v5.12 kernels,
> > including -rc1, which could result in some fairly serious fs
> > corruption (see the LWN article below). With that in mind, I'm not
> > going to reset the selinux/next and audit/next branches for this
> > development cycle ...
>
> That idea was spectacularly short lived :/ Assuming -rc2 fixes the
> swapfile bug, I'll plan on rebasing both -next branches to -rc2 early
> next week. This should have zero impact on the audit tree (audit/next
> is current empty), and a minimal impact on the selinux/next branch as
> we only have one small patch in there at the moment.
Well, it appears you are far from the only subsystem maintainer doing
that for this cycle.
> If for some reason this causes anyone a problem due to merge
> conflicts, you can still submit your patches (assuming they apply
> cleanly to the stable-5.12 branch) and I'll take care of the conflict.
>
> Thanks for your understanding.
>
> --
> paul moore
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Quick announcement on the selinux/next and audit/next branches
2021-03-06 15:00 ` Richard Guy Briggs
@ 2021-03-06 15:20 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2021-03-06 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Guy Briggs; +Cc: selinux, linux-audit
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 10:00 AM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2021-03-05 12:56, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:03 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > As many of you are aware, normally with the close of the merge window
> > > and the release of -rc1 I typically reset the selinux/next and
> > > audit/next branches to Linus' -rc1 tag. However, as you may have
> > > heard already, there is a nasty problem with the early v5.12 kernels,
> > > including -rc1, which could result in some fairly serious fs
> > > corruption (see the LWN article below). With that in mind, I'm not
> > > going to reset the selinux/next and audit/next branches for this
> > > development cycle ...
> >
> > That idea was spectacularly short lived :/ Assuming -rc2 fixes the
> > swapfile bug, I'll plan on rebasing both -next branches to -rc2 early
> > next week. This should have zero impact on the audit tree (audit/next
> > is current empty), and a minimal impact on the selinux/next branch as
> > we only have one small patch in there at the moment.
>
> Well, it appears you are far from the only subsystem maintainer doing
> that for this cycle.
FWIW, not rebasing the -next branches would likely work out okay for
most release cycles, we just happen to have a SELinux/IMA patch which
has a dependency on code that was merged during the v5.12 merge window
so we need to rebase selinux/next at the very least and since the
audit/next branch is still empty I figured I might as well rebase that
too.
I suspect this will have little to no impact on anyone, but I wanted
to let you folks know regardless. No one likes surprises when it
comes to upstream trees.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-06 15:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-05 2:03 Quick announcement on the selinux/next and audit/next branches Paul Moore
2021-03-05 17:56 ` Paul Moore
2021-03-06 15:00 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2021-03-06 15:20 ` Paul Moore
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).