From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D79C433EF for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-125-hPX11t5FPMKLcmd-_OaHYQ-1; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:51:24 -0500 X-MC-Unique: hPX11t5FPMKLcmd-_OaHYQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB6381CCB9; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB9495F4E1; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F754CA9B; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 1B38j5K1028428 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 03:45:07 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id CFE441402408; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast04.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAFAC1402406 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57C0106655E for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-472-MrBnClHHOFWBTfediFJu_g-1; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 03:45:01 -0500 X-MC-Unique: MrBnClHHOFWBTfediFJu_g-1 Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mt2QV-00EcqD-Aj; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 06:52:11 +0000 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 22:52:11 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Roberto Sassu Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] device mapper: Add builtin function dm_get_status() Message-ID: References: <81d5e825-1ee2-8f6b-cd9d-07b0f8bd36d3@linux.microsoft.com> <20211201163708.3578176-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.7 X-loop: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:51:05 -0500 Cc: "snitzer@redhat.com" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com" , "dm-devel@redhat.com" , "agk@redhat.com" , Christoph Hellwig , "corbet@lwn.net" , "jmorris@namei.org" , "ebiggers@kernel.org" , "serge@hallyn.com" , "jannh@google.com" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org" , "tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "tytso@mit.edu" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "eparis@redhat.com" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-audit@redhat.com" , "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" X-BeenThere: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Linux Audit Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 09:29:52AM +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote: > The problem being solved is how to grant access to files > which satisfy a property defined in the policy. If you have want to enforce access to files in the block layer using a specific stacking block driver you don't just have one layering violation but a bunch of them. Please go back to the drawing board. -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit