From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Stephen R. van den Berg" Subject: Re: 3.18.1 + latest bcache-dev Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:49:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20150105084919.GA11249@cuci.nl> References: <20141228023534.GA25860@cuci.nl> <54A81B78.2070409@rolffokkens.nl> <20150104004621.GA4460@kmo-pixel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from aristoteles.cuci.nl ([212.125.128.18]:51225 "EHLO aristoteles.cuci.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753183AbbAEItV (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2015 03:49:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150104004621.GA4460@kmo-pixel> Sender: linux-bcache-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Kent Overstreet wrote: >Yes, correct. The on disk format changes in bcache-dev are just too deep to >feasibly write backwards compat code, unfortunately. >And the on disk format is still in flux - for just a bit longer hopefully >though, right now I'm working on a pretty major revamp that's getting close to Any chance we could get a git url of the bcache-tools-in-flux as well? -- Stephen.