From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE3CC48BE5 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291896100A for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230013AbhFUPQk (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:16:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40842 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229945AbhFUPQj (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:16:39 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D54C2C061574 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id q18so15580121ile.10 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tsu7eDLoNDm5bb4H1/D+NsnNSYlHRlAHX6coAFFVuSU=; b=b3rb82PI+YEMnnS8yKwnGUJgdkHs6/3GNq3DAKs5pZXqX8QdriURpK51KVxJR44OIZ 8e6tMcFQcmRkXsoAev0FlaJeq7oH/oD9XANXfzQHeGZx5/JEugdJRdbXXWmSaFPa3XKR i6JhxDev9UFkkFIjXX6LDP3XNEmfGYFb7uzVvpyLmYv0qdWsVtcG6tXelkSuF0cqSjfi PF2/ogBjOE/cxrbf75kurnOeGx4uCIbwyT0yhbvl1FKZgvbbg81Z8SHlYViLLowzWP47 BJujuJgD4nZZ5ZMm08m/zFTKE5J0tApHf1701TnmgkeE3DaQc9IwYo9k/N2J1r/RijFf eCUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tsu7eDLoNDm5bb4H1/D+NsnNSYlHRlAHX6coAFFVuSU=; b=NKaynhwBcF8/6O2jv718dh7TOMlpJ2qqD2BrPfE9rZsE8ieKgMI/dzqxECdBD/dXmW 8cjzk6YaAqRuNVaynn6SvHAAFiK3PoZGFPFY1sowd1C0b/rJHVnAvmMgT98hoSYTeNHD xudw/ccxpLdFyVs0Bq92l5iA07g2kPkkrtJv5hXy93/j4H7iTxn3CQJ69TSpkGkiEbCb xuWlFxNuM2plP/UP+5auhnr7bJLpPDe1pJ5Fu8GBpQWMvP2nzd6VwmQ1bhOnz58m+x32 Th2txGFcoRDv0m8FKBiNBPMXhK+VFUWva/xjzbrYBY9MaWHpbRpL6Js7lYuLhW1ov+gq PSag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310zTYy03jXoDGefuxLgk2iq76bFFMoSOAKkEtkaMNLZCgRsRFl KgRO86vudg2qeL1wc0rKbrFCaQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy88YRDcaFe0BKVZvue6TrZNXIZRKsNZz7WrsfoSF8Nm601LTC2PBCAKfusaOb0pfhoBu6qTw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:c5a9:: with SMTP id r9mr17872497ilt.56.1624288463256; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.30] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u14sm2807443iln.43.2021.06.21.08.14.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] bcache patches for Linux v5.14 To: Coly Li Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org References: <20210615054921.101421-1-colyli@suse.de> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:14:22 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210615054921.101421-1-colyli@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On 6/14/21 11:49 PM, Coly Li wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Here are the bcache patches for Linux v5.14. > > The patches from Chao Yu and Ding Senjie are useful code cleanup. The > rested patches for the NVDIMM support to bcache journaling. > > For the series to support NVDIMM to bache journaling, all reported > issue since last merge window are all fixed. And no more issue detected > during our testing or by the kernel test robot. If there is any issue > reported during they stay in linux-next, I, Jianpang and Qiaowei will > response and fix immediately. > > Please take them for Linux v5.14. I'd really like the user api bits to have some wider review. Maybe I'm missing something, but there's a lot of weird stuff in the uapi header that includes things like pointers etc. -- Jens Axboe