From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (luna.lichtvoll.de [194.150.191.11]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1934D7 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2023 08:58:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95DB182DD46; Sun, 3 Dec 2023 17:58:36 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail.lichtvoll.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=martin smtp.mailfrom=martin@lichtvoll.de From: Martin Steigerwald To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Questions related to BCacheFS Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2023 17:58:36 +0100 Message-ID: <2272887.iZASKD2KPV@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: <20231119231001.tb3teva5j4azqp7i@moria.home.lan> References: <23311511.6Emhk5qWAg@lichtvoll.de> <2273246.iZASKD2KPV@lichtvoll.de> <20231119231001.tb3teva5j4azqp7i@moria.home.lan> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Kent Overstreet - 20.11.23, 00:10:01 CET: > > I got two setbacks regarding trying BCacheFS on my laptop yesterday > > and > > today: > > > > 1) Linux 6.7-rc1, as mentioned almost rc2, did not hibernate on > > ThinkPad T14 AMD Gen 1. It just blanked screen and nothing happened. > > So I went back to 6.6.1 temporarily. I do not really intend to do a > > git bisect between rc1 and 6.6 on a production laptop. It would be > > very time-consuming and possibly be dangerous. I may go back to 6.7 > > even without hibernation, just using standby over night for a while. > > I bet BCacheFS is compatible with hibernation (as in writing memory > > contents to encrypted swap and resuming from it)? > > I believe so - I have not tested hibernation specifically. Today I tried with 6.7-rc4 and the issue of non working hibernation does not seem to be related to BCacheFS, cause the module was not loaded and it again did not hibernate. -- Martin