* [syzbot] possible deadlock in bd_register_pending_holders
@ 2021-09-10 14:42 syzbot
2021-09-10 16:57 ` Tetsuo Handa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2021-09-10 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe, linux-block, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 27151f177827 Merge tag 'perf-tools-for-v5.15-2021-09-04' o..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=104612b3300000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ac2f9cc43f6b17e4
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f5608de5d89cc0d998c7
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+f5608de5d89cc0d998c7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/10219 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880288d5918 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: bd_register_pending_holders+0x2c/0x470 block/holder.c:160
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880996a0230 (&mddev->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: md_alloc+0x911/0x1150 drivers/md/md.c:5706
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #8 (&mddev->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x131/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
md_alloc+0x911/0x1150 drivers/md/md.c:5706
md_probe+0x69/0x70 drivers/md/md.c:5738
blk_request_module+0x111/0x1d0 block/genhd.c:632
blkdev_get_no_open+0x178/0x1e0 fs/block_dev.c:1150
blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x22/0xb60 fs/block_dev.c:1214
blkdev_get_by_dev fs/block_dev.c:1323 [inline]
blkdev_open+0x295/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1329
do_dentry_open+0x4c8/0x11d0 fs/open.c:822
do_open fs/namei.c:3426 [inline]
path_openat+0x1c9a/0x2740 fs/namei.c:3559
do_filp_open+0x1aa/0x400 fs/namei.c:3586
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4d0 fs/open.c:1200
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1216 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1232 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1227 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x13f/0x1f0 fs/open.c:1227
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #7 (disks_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x131/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
md_alloc+0x37/0x1150 drivers/md/md.c:5644
md_probe+0x69/0x70 drivers/md/md.c:5738
blk_request_module+0x111/0x1d0 block/genhd.c:632
blkdev_get_no_open+0x178/0x1e0 fs/block_dev.c:1150
blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x22/0xb60 fs/block_dev.c:1214
blkdev_get_by_dev fs/block_dev.c:1323 [inline]
blkdev_open+0x295/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1329
do_dentry_open+0x4c8/0x11d0 fs/open.c:822
do_open fs/namei.c:3426 [inline]
path_openat+0x1c9a/0x2740 fs/namei.c:3559
do_filp_open+0x1aa/0x400 fs/namei.c:3586
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4d0 fs/open.c:1200
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1216 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1232 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1227 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x13f/0x1f0 fs/open.c:1227
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #6 (major_names_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x131/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
blkdev_show+0x27/0x160 block/genhd.c:198
devinfo_show+0xc1/0xf0 fs/proc/devices.c:22
seq_read_iter+0xbb0/0x1240 fs/seq_file.c:272
proc_reg_read_iter+0x1fb/0x2d0 fs/proc/inode.c:300
call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2157 [inline]
new_sync_read+0x421/0x6e0 fs/read_write.c:404
vfs_read+0x35c/0x600 fs/read_write.c:485
ksys_read+0x12d/0x250 fs/read_write.c:623
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #5 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x131/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
seq_read_iter+0xdf/0x1240 fs/seq_file.c:182
call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2157 [inline]
generic_file_splice_read+0x453/0x6d0 fs/splice.c:311
do_splice_to+0x1bf/0x250 fs/splice.c:796
splice_direct_to_actor+0x2c2/0x8c0 fs/splice.c:870
do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:979
do_sendfile+0xae9/0x1240 fs/read_write.c:1249
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1314 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1300 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1300
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #4 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1812 [inline]
sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1882 [inline]
file_start_write include/linux/fs.h:3008 [inline]
lo_write_bvec+0x3b6/0x6d0 drivers/block/loop.c:327
lo_write_simple drivers/block/loop.c:350 [inline]
do_req_filebacked drivers/block/loop.c:668 [inline]
loop_handle_cmd drivers/block/loop.c:2202 [inline]
loop_process_work+0xc60/0x24e0 drivers/block/loop.c:2242
process_one_work+0x9bf/0x16b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
-> #3 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
process_one_work+0x92e/0x16b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2273
worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
-> #2 ((wq_completion)loop5){+.+.}-{0:0}:
flush_workqueue+0x110/0x15b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2817
drain_workqueue+0x1a5/0x3c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2982
destroy_workqueue+0x71/0x800 kernel/workqueue.c:4419
__loop_clr_fd+0x212/0x15e0 drivers/block/loop.c:1368
lo_release+0x1ac/0x1f0 drivers/block/loop.c:2068
blkdev_put_whole fs/block_dev.c:1102 [inline]
blkdev_put+0x2fb/0x9e0 fs/block_dev.c:1393
btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1108 [inline]
btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1098 [inline]
btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1127 [inline]
close_fs_devices+0x26a/0xa20 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1157
btrfs_close_devices+0x8e/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1172
close_ctree+0x752/0x795 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4438
generic_shutdown_super+0x14c/0x370 fs/super.c:465
kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1057
btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2348
deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335
deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366
cleanup_mnt+0x3a2/0x540 fs/namespace.c:1137
task_work_run+0xdd/0x1a0 kernel/task_work.c:164
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:189 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:175 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x27e/0x290 kernel/entry/common.c:209
__syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:291 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x60 kernel/entry/common.c:302
do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #1 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x131/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
lo_open+0x75/0x120 drivers/block/loop.c:2040
blkdev_get_whole+0x99/0x2a0 fs/block_dev.c:1079
blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x354/0xb60 fs/block_dev.c:1234
blkdev_get_by_dev fs/block_dev.c:1323 [inline]
blkdev_open+0x295/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1329
do_dentry_open+0x4c8/0x11d0 fs/open.c:822
do_open fs/namei.c:3426 [inline]
path_openat+0x1c9a/0x2740 fs/namei.c:3559
do_filp_open+0x1aa/0x400 fs/namei.c:3586
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4d0 fs/open.c:1200
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1216 [inline]
__do_sys_open fs/open.c:1224 [inline]
__se_sys_open fs/open.c:1220 [inline]
__x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1220
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #0 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a07/0x54a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x131/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
bd_register_pending_holders+0x2c/0x470 block/holder.c:160
device_add_disk+0x74c/0xfc0 block/genhd.c:470
add_disk include/linux/genhd.h:221 [inline]
md_alloc+0x91d/0x1150 drivers/md/md.c:5707
md_probe+0x69/0x70 drivers/md/md.c:5738
blk_request_module+0x111/0x1d0 block/genhd.c:632
blkdev_get_no_open+0x178/0x1e0 fs/block_dev.c:1150
blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x22/0xb60 fs/block_dev.c:1214
blkdev_get_by_dev fs/block_dev.c:1323 [inline]
blkdev_open+0x295/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1329
do_dentry_open+0x4c8/0x11d0 fs/open.c:822
do_open fs/namei.c:3426 [inline]
path_openat+0x1c9a/0x2740 fs/namei.c:3559
do_filp_open+0x1aa/0x400 fs/namei.c:3586
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4d0 fs/open.c:1200
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1216 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1232 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1227 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x13f/0x1f0 fs/open.c:1227
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&disk->open_mutex --> disks_mutex --> &mddev->open_mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&mddev->open_mutex);
lock(disks_mutex);
lock(&mddev->open_mutex);
lock(&disk->open_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz-executor.1/10219:
#0: ffffffff8c204908 (major_names_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blk_request_module+0x25/0x1d0 block/genhd.c:629
#1: ffffffff8cd2fc48 (disks_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: md_alloc+0x37/0x1150 drivers/md/md.c:5644
#2: ffff8880996a0230 (&mddev->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: md_alloc+0x911/0x1150 drivers/md/md.c:5706
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 10219 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.14.0-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:105
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a07/0x54a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x131/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
bd_register_pending_holders+0x2c/0x470 block/holder.c:160
device_add_disk+0x74c/0xfc0 block/genhd.c:470
add_disk include/linux/genhd.h:221 [inline]
md_alloc+0x91d/0x1150 drivers/md/md.c:5707
md_probe+0x69/0x70 drivers/md/md.c:5738
blk_request_module+0x111/0x1d0 block/genhd.c:632
blkdev_get_no_open+0x178/0x1e0 fs/block_dev.c:1150
blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x22/0xb60 fs/block_dev.c:1214
blkdev_get_by_dev fs/block_dev.c:1323 [inline]
blkdev_open+0x295/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1329
do_dentry_open+0x4c8/0x11d0 fs/open.c:822
do_open fs/namei.c:3426 [inline]
path_openat+0x1c9a/0x2740 fs/namei.c:3559
do_filp_open+0x1aa/0x400 fs/namei.c:3586
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4d0 fs/open.c:1200
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1216 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1232 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1227 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x13f/0x1f0 fs/open.c:1227
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x4665f9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f99121a3188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000056c038 RCX: 00000000004665f9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000200020c0 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c
RBP: 00000000004bfcc4 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000056c038
R13: 00007ffea339c34f R14: 00007f99121a3300 R15: 0000000000022000
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in bd_register_pending_holders
2021-09-10 14:42 [syzbot] possible deadlock in bd_register_pending_holders syzbot
@ 2021-09-10 16:57 ` Tetsuo Handa
2021-09-20 17:10 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2021-09-10 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot, axboe, linux-block, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs
Since commit dfbb3409b27fa42b in axboe/linux-block.git#block-5.15 breaks
"sb_writers#$N => &p->lock => major_names_lock" dependency chain,
I think that this dependency chain should be no longer possible.
#syz fix: block: genhd: don't call blkdev_show() with major_names_lock held
On 2021/09/10 23:42, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 27151f177827 Merge tag 'perf-tools-for-v5.15-2021-09-04' o..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=104612b3300000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ac2f9cc43f6b17e4
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f5608de5d89cc0d998c7
> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+f5608de5d89cc0d998c7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in bd_register_pending_holders
2021-09-10 16:57 ` Tetsuo Handa
@ 2021-09-20 17:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-09-21 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2021-09-20 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tetsuo Handa, syzbot, axboe, linux-block, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs
On 9/10/21 9:57 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Since commit dfbb3409b27fa42b in axboe/linux-block.git#block-5.15 breaks
> "sb_writers#$N => &p->lock => major_names_lock" dependency chain,
> I think that this dependency chain should be no longer possible.
>
> #syz fix: block: genhd: don't call blkdev_show() with major_names_lock held
>
> On 2021/09/10 23:42, syzbot wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzbot found the following issue on:
>>
>> HEAD commit: 27151f177827 Merge tag 'perf-tools-for-v5.15-2021-09-04' o..
>> git tree: upstream
>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=104612b3300000
>> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ac2f9cc43f6b17e4
>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f5608de5d89cc0d998c7
>> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1
>>
>> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>>
>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
>> Reported-by: syzbot+f5608de5d89cc0d998c7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Note that current kernels (which include dfbb3409b27fa42b)
still hit this :
[ 3.197383] ======================================================
[ 3.204253] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 3.211116] 5.15.0-dbx-DEV #16 Not tainted
[ 3.215907] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 3.222770] kinit/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 3.227900] ffffa09bc8971230 (&mddev->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: md_open+0xf3/0x150
[ 3.237803]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 3.245020] ffffa09bcf003f18 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev+0xa2/0x580
[ 3.254663]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 3.264916]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 3.273772]
-> #1 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 3.281422] lock_acquire+0xb3/0x1e0
[ 3.286213] __mutex_lock_common+0xe0/0xde0
[ 3.291619] mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x30
[ 3.296749] bd_register_pending_holders+0x2c/0x130
[ 3.302839] device_add_disk+0x1c0/0x3a0
[ 3.307969] md_alloc+0x3ed/0x550
[ 3.312493] md_probe+0x35/0x40
[ 3.316843] blk_request_module+0x6b/0xd0
[ 3.322058] blkdev_get_no_open+0x33/0xb0
[ 3.327275] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x69/0x580
[ 3.332501] blkdev_open+0x61/0x90
[ 3.337118] do_dentry_open+0x281/0x3a0
[ 3.342170] vfs_open+0x2d/0x30
[ 3.346529] path_openat+0xb93/0xf30
[ 3.351345] do_filp_open+0xc7/0x170
[ 3.356127] do_sys_openat2+0x91/0x170
[ 3.361085] __x64_sys_open+0x7c/0xa0
[ 3.365963] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xa0
[ 3.370762] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 3.377034]
-> #0 (&mddev->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 3.384770] validate_chain+0xacb/0x2e60
[ 3.389900] __lock_acquire+0x91e/0xf00
[ 3.394950] lock_acquire+0xb3/0x1e0
[ 3.399734] __mutex_lock_common+0xe0/0xde0
[ 3.405131] mutex_lock_interruptible_nested+0x20/0x30
[ 3.411482] md_open+0xf3/0x150
[ 3.415840] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x1b2/0x580
[ 3.421153] blkdev_open+0x61/0x90
[ 3.425771] do_dentry_open+0x281/0x3a0
[ 3.430821] vfs_open+0x2d/0x30
[ 3.435180] path_openat+0xb93/0xf30
[ 3.439980] do_filp_open+0xc7/0x170
[ 3.444762] do_sys_openat2+0x91/0x170
[ 3.449720] __x64_sys_open+0x7c/0xa0
[ 3.454597] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xa0
[ 3.459391] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 3.465654]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 3.475721] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 3.483017] CPU0 CPU1
[ 3.488241] ---- ----
[ 3.493457] lock(&disk->open_mutex);
[ 3.497900] lock(&mddev->open_mutex);
[ 3.504955] lock(&disk->open_mutex);
[ 3.511912] lock(&mddev->open_mutex);
[ 3.516434]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 3.524424] 1 lock held by kinit/1:
[ 3.527289] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 2599.997 MHz
[ 3.528600] #0: ffffa09bcf003f18 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev+0xa2/0x580
[ 3.535499] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x257a391c223, max_idle_ns: 440795220104 ns
[ 3.545202]
stack backtrace:
[ 3.545204] CPU: 17 PID: 1 Comm: kinit Not tainted 5.15.0-dbx-DEV #16
[ 3.545208] Hardware name: Intel RML,PCH/Ibis_QC_18, BIOS 2.48.0 10/02/2019
[ 3.576394] Call Trace:
[ 3.579540] dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x9a
[ 3.583898] dump_stack+0x10/0x12
[ 3.587908] print_circular_bug+0x2cb/0x2d0
[ 3.592786] check_noncircular+0x139/0x140
[ 3.597579] validate_chain+0xacb/0x2e60
[ 3.602199] ? add_lock_to_list+0xdd/0x110
[ 3.606987] ? validate_chain+0x8ee/0x2e60
[ 3.611781] __lock_acquire+0x91e/0xf00
[ 3.616311] lock_acquire+0xb3/0x1e0
[ 3.620581] ? md_open+0xf3/0x150
[ 3.624596] __mutex_lock_common+0xe0/0xde0
[ 3.629471] ? md_open+0xf3/0x150
[ 3.633482] ? md_open+0xf3/0x150
[ 3.637493] ? md_open+0xa0/0x150
[ 3.641507] ? lock_release+0xc5/0x260
[ 3.645953] mutex_lock_interruptible_nested+0x20/0x30
[ 3.651784] md_open+0xf3/0x150
[ 3.655623] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x1b2/0x580
[ 3.660417] blkdev_open+0x61/0x90
[ 3.664511] do_dentry_open+0x281/0x3a0
[ 3.669044] vfs_open+0x2d/0x30
[ 3.672881] path_openat+0xb93/0xf30
[ 3.677157] ? __lock_acquire+0x91e/0xf00
[ 3.681858] ? lock_is_held_type+0x9b/0x130
[ 3.686737] do_filp_open+0xc7/0x170
[ 3.691015] do_sys_openat2+0x91/0x170
[ 3.695463] __x64_sys_open+0x7c/0xa0
[ 3.699821] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xa0
[ 3.704091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 3.709835] RIP: 0033:0x20fe89
[ 3.713587] Code: 48 89 77 38 c3 89 f0 48 8b 1f 48 8b 67 08 48 8b 6f 10 4c 8b 67 18 4c 8b 6f 20 4c 8b 77 28 4c 8b 7f 30 ff 67 38 49 89 ca 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 f7
d8 89 05 5e 36 00 00 48 83 c8 ff c3
[ 3.733022] RSP: 002b:00007ffebd54c5d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
[ 3.741279] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000020fe89
[ 3.749102] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000000020076f
[ 3.756920] RBP: 00007ffebd54cbc0 R08: 0000000000000042 R09: 000000000000006d
[ 3.764746] R10: 000000000020fe89 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in bd_register_pending_holders
2021-09-20 17:10 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2021-09-21 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-09-21 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Tetsuo Handa, syzbot, axboe, linux-block, linux-kernel,
syzkaller-bugs, Song Liu
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:10:55AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Note that current kernels (which include dfbb3409b27fa42b)
> still hit this :
>
> [ 3.197383] ======================================================
> [ 3.204253] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> [ 3.211116] 5.15.0-dbx-DEV #16 Not tainted
> [ 3.215907] ------------------------------------------------------
> [ 3.222770] kinit/1 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 3.227900] ffffa09bc8971230 (&mddev->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: md_open+0xf3/0x150
> [ 3.237803]
> but task is already holding lock:
> [ 3.245020] ffffa09bcf003f18 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev+0xa2/0x580
This should be fixed by:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=163049641806992&w=2
Song, what is the plan to get that into Linus' tree?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-21 7:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-10 14:42 [syzbot] possible deadlock in bd_register_pending_holders syzbot
2021-09-10 16:57 ` Tetsuo Handa
2021-09-20 17:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-09-21 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).