Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
To: "'Vlastimil Babka'" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Michal Hocko'" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	"'Mel Gorman'" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	"'Johannes Weiner'" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	<nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	<open-iscsi@googlegroups.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Andrey Ryabinin'" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: prevent potential recursive reclaim due to clearing PF_MEMALLOC
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:33:03 +0800
Message-ID: <092301d2af71$31c97fe0$955c7fa0$@alibaba-inc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170405074700.29871-2-vbabka@suse.cz>

On April 05, 2017 3:47 PM Vlastimil Babka wrote: 
> 
> The function __alloc_pages_direct_compact() sets PF_MEMALLOC to prevent
> deadlock during page migration by lock_page() (see the comment in
> __unmap_and_move()). Then it unconditionally clears the flag, which can clear a
> pre-existing PF_MEMALLOC flag and result in recursive reclaim. This was not a
> problem until commit a8161d1ed609 ("mm, page_alloc: restructure direct
> compaction handling in slowpath"), because direct compation was called only
> after direct reclaim, which was skipped when PF_MEMALLOC flag was set.
> 
> Even now it's only a theoretical issue, as the new callsite of
> __alloc_pages_direct_compact() is reached only for costly orders and when
> gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed() is true, which means either __GFP_NOMEMALLOC is in
> gfp_flags or in_interrupt() is true. There is no such known context, but let's
> play it safe and make __alloc_pages_direct_compact() robust for cases where
> PF_MEMALLOC is already set.
> 
> Fixes: a8161d1ed609 ("mm, page_alloc: restructure direct compaction handling in slowpath")
> Reported-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>

>  mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 3589f8be53be..b84e6ffbe756 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3288,6 +3288,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  		enum compact_priority prio, enum compact_result *compact_result)
>  {
>  	struct page *page;
> +	unsigned int noreclaim_flag = current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC;
> 
>  	if (!order)
>  		return NULL;
> @@ -3295,7 +3296,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
>  	*compact_result = try_to_compact_pages(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
>  									prio);
> -	current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
> +	current->flags = (current->flags & ~PF_MEMALLOC) | noreclaim_flag;
> 
>  	if (*compact_result <= COMPACT_INACTIVE)
>  		return NULL;
> --
> 2.12.2

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-05  7:46 [PATCH 0/4] more robust PF_MEMALLOC handling Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05  7:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: prevent potential recursive reclaim due to clearing PF_MEMALLOC Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05 11:21   ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-05 11:40   ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-07  9:21     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-07  7:33   ` Hillf Danton [this message]
2017-04-05  7:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce memalloc_noreclaim_{save,restore} Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05 11:28   ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-07  7:38   ` Hillf Danton
2017-04-05  7:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] treewide: convert PF_MEMALLOC manipulations to new helpers Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05 11:30   ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-06  6:38     ` [Nbd] " Wouter Verhelst
2017-04-06 11:25       ` Mel Gorman
2017-04-05  7:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*() Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05 11:31   ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-05 11:36     ` Richard Weinberger
2017-04-05 11:39       ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05 12:09         ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-06  6:33         ` Adrian Hunter
2017-04-06  7:27           ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='092301d2af71$31c97fe0$955c7fa0$@alibaba-inc.com' \
    --to=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=open-iscsi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/0 linux-block/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-block linux-block/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block \
		linux-block@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-block

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-block


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git