linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] nvme: use blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:51:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e40714a-e1aa-163e-0d8e-db1ea439faad@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92b821a6-a774-d85b-2711-418d36fc10d0@grimberg.me>



On 2020/7/28 11:34, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
>>>> All controller namespaces share the same tagset, so we
>>>> can use this interface which does the optimal operation
>>>> for parallel quiesce based on the tagset type (e.g.
>>>> blocking tagsets and non-blocking tagsets).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 14 ++------------
>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>>>> index 05aa568a60af..c41df20996d7 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>>>> @@ -4557,23 +4557,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_start_freeze);
>>>>   void nvme_stop_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
>>>>   {
>>>> -    struct nvme_ns *ns;
>>>> -
>>>> -    down_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
>>>> -    list_for_each_entry(ns, &ctrl->namespaces, list)
>>>> -        blk_mq_quiesce_queue(ns->queue);
>>>> -    up_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
>>>> +    blk_mq_quiesce_tagset(ctrl->tagset);
>>>
>>> Rrr.. this one is slightly annoying. We have the connect_q in
>>> fabrics that we use to issue the connect command which is now
>>> quiesced too...
>>>
>>> If we will use this interface, we can unquiesce it right away,
>>> but that seems kinda backwards..Io queue and admin queue has different treat mechanism, introduce
>> blk_mq_quiesce_tagset may make the mechanism unclear. So this is
>> probably not a good choice.
> 
> The meaning of blk_mq_quiesce_tagset is clear, the awkward thing is
> that we need to unquiesce the connect_q after blk_mq_quiesce_tagset
> quiesced it.
Io queue and admin queue has different treat mechanism. If we switch to
blk_mq_quiesce_tagset, maybe we need do more extras such as unquiesce
the connect_q, thus the mechanism maybe unclear. Surely if we introduce
blk_mq_quiesce_tagset for new feature, the abstraction is great.
> 
> I'm thinking of resorting from this abstraction...
> .

      reply	other threads:[~2020-07-28  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-27 23:10 [PATCH v5 0/2] improve nvme quiesce time for large amount of namespaces Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-27 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] blk-mq: add tagset quiesce interface Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-27 23:32   ` Keith Busch
2020-07-28  0:12     ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  1:40   ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  1:51     ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-28  2:17       ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  2:23         ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-28  2:28           ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  2:32             ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-28  3:29               ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  3:25     ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  7:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-28  7:48     ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  9:16     ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  9:24       ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  9:33         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  9:37           ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  9:43             ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28 10:10               ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28 10:57                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-28 14:13                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-28 10:58             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-28 16:25               ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28 13:54         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-28 23:46           ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-29  0:31             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-29  0:43               ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-29  0:59                 ` Keith Busch
2020-07-29  4:39                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-07  9:04                     ` Chao Leng
2020-08-07  9:24                       ` Ming Lei
2020-08-07  9:35                         ` Chao Leng
2020-07-29  4:10                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-29  4:37                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-27 23:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] nvme: use blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  0:54   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  3:21     ` Chao Leng
2020-07-28  3:34       ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28  3:51         ` Chao Leng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e40714a-e1aa-163e-0d8e-db1ea439faad@huawei.com \
    --to=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mlin@kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).