From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2227C636CA for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B926A61244 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237812AbhGUMDD (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:03:03 -0400 Received: from esa4.hgst.iphmx.com ([216.71.154.42]:44572 "EHLO esa4.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237633AbhGUMDD (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:03:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1626871420; x=1658407420; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+AOmYnp5eWwCpHbiJveVjM12q0Aiis7WZQe+HfKdN1k=; b=Mf2Ucni6WB/4VfagXOb/D87rkHtOjZWzhE8pNS6pw8b4JbGXmRi4Xa0O WbWc6suDXxDnpl1PN5iSdATsWPmKPrLVxDt7ohbBUw0AELjIELwEz/9qP XRZTbx0jcu+o9qqzghWEaiDv2UP06u0zi/l5h9Or9YWZ9xXTPxmnvucs4 g9I/vF306xeINUP3Xd6Wfca82lMrK08QUKjmw7yhai5m6T//5U4dEnCu3 iTvgh4RJtj49fPOfFdUKbIagiFzoYQXrS+wt3mY25BIZs+cB5RwO/azHZ OEVIKz0Y7Lnip/5Qh15QnkZV3aUBUJsZIWlMxfuUrNewrwkjA53HxWTNt g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,258,1620662400"; d="scan'208";a="174366712" Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.15]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2021 20:43:40 +0800 IronPort-SDR: GCoQug1cBxEWJodie1R+kLOcuDONRUG7AnUAhM+by73Fcz0XEqCYrne4y7g56OShTsTUOXXKzM Uiy2rhkingLDLW/a5q4K1kXjW6Q0cosFBsgRVYPaZLHMVBdS/LX6eT2ax7JCVGrDCoE4RyUYx9 fZ20Q7jsq20d/6T3xk6XF/Sa85iGTg/U0DRdFSaGoaCHkPxgyBMczzuZ01+C4jqXNvXNkvvEdT aaNjxeKkrREo88DOhFB57QSWOSs5TyMU4OuwFgPsAhRZ7Gk6uVC0cFny0Mf51AIREJBnkIds2b Zh3Wfaz/WNB8Q1irZVYdeAvs Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jul 2021 05:19:55 -0700 IronPort-SDR: RJSbz3nvaJqmgbTocMX6w3UNFHfD/f6H55O/Jr9AQm1WE3tftR2Gkl4mGKsiz885NCMIDE9wzK qs6ZenpakotAMjLE4IH3RRBe1PCtkfAsNKIbK7NtL+x/xE0VKD0LQJakYLDxrV1f51bx0gPthY RFRMq+zjgI1/S4q9ijCTJrnZAAcQ1qlv+dF1pUOOGDzjv0G9rlxJBi4Xg/yV8inZ7nrTszQE0c +OpClsyde+CmYVRbJLfy2Nzl3XpK/iJehHqpyh5siTGcKX2hGZ5Qf5mf5YaAc49wp37F3J6Z4N yMg= WDCIronportException: Internal Received: from my8nr8qf2.ad.shared (HELO naota-xeon.wdc.com) ([10.225.49.83]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2021 05:43:39 -0700 From: Naohiro Aota To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jens Axboe , David Sterba , Naohiro Aota Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] btrfs: drop unnecessary ASSERT from btrfs_submit_direct() Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 21:43:34 +0900 Message-Id: <13a38aa3e4b99f11970f96a85ce0a71498ff0737.1626871138.git.naohiro.aota@wdc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org When on SINGLE block group, btrfs_get_io_geometry() will return "the size of the block group - the offset of the logical address within the block group" as geom.len. Since we allow up to 8 GB zone size on zoned btrfs, we can have up to 8 GB block group, so can have up to 8 GB geom.len. With this setup, we easily hit the "ASSERT(geom.len <= INT_MAX);". The ASSERT looks like to guard btrfs_bio_clone_partial() and bio_trim() which both take "int" (now "unsigned int" with the previous patch). So to be precise the ASSERT should check if clone_len <= UINT_MAX. But actually, clone_len is already capped by bio.bi_iter.bi_size which is unsigned int. So the ASSERT is not necessary. Drop the ASSERT and properly compare submit_len and geom.len in u64. Then, let the implicit casting to convert it to unsigned int. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 8f60314c36c5..8cd1a4f0174a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -8206,8 +8206,8 @@ static blk_qc_t btrfs_submit_direct(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap, u64 start_sector; int async_submit = 0; u64 submit_len; - int clone_offset = 0; - int clone_len; + u64 clone_offset = 0; + u64 clone_len; u64 logical; int ret; blk_status_t status; @@ -8255,9 +8255,9 @@ static blk_qc_t btrfs_submit_direct(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap, status = errno_to_blk_status(ret); goto out_err_em; } - ASSERT(geom.len <= INT_MAX); - clone_len = min_t(int, submit_len, geom.len); + clone_len = min(submit_len, geom.len); + ASSERT(clone_len <= UINT_MAX); /* * This will never fail as it's passing GPF_NOFS and -- 2.32.0