linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux@gmail.com>,
	Xuewei Zhang <xueweiz@google.com>
Cc: Linux SPARC Kernel Mailing List <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [5.0-rc5 regression] "scsi: kill off the legacy IO path" causes 5 minute delay during boot on Sun Blade 2500
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:24:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1549985049.3173.3.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc547d40-9a42-a823-b62f-460c3244fe7d@kernel.dk>

On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 19:50 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/11/19 7:13 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 09:31 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 2/11/19 9:28 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:46 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > On 2/11/19 8:42 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:28 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2/11/19 8:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:35 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 2/10/19 9:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > > > > > > > > That check wasn't changed by the code removal.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > As I said above, for sd. This isn't true for non-
> > > > > > > > > disks.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Yes, but the behaviour above doesn't change across a
> > > > > > > > switch
> > > > > > > > to MQ, so I don't quite understand how it bisects back
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > that change.  If we're not gathering entropy for the
> > > > > > > > device
> > > > > > > > now, we wouldn't have been before the switch, so the
> > > > > > > > entropy characteristics shouldn't have changed.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > But it does, as I also wrote in that first email. The
> > > > > > > legacy
> > > > > > > queue flags had QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM set by default, the
> > > > > > > MQ
> > > > > > > ones do not. Hence any non-sd device would previously
> > > > > > > ALWAYS
> > > > > > > have ADD_RANDOM set, now none of them do. Also see the
> > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > I sent.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > So your theory is that the disk in question never gets to
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > rotational check?  because the check will clear the flag if
> > > > > > it's non-rotational and set it if it's not, so the default
> > > > > > state of the flag shouldn't matter.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No, my point is about non-disks, devices that aren't driven
> > > > > by
> > > > > sd. The behavior for sd hasn't changed, as it sets/clears it
> > > > > unconditionally. 
> > > > 
> > > > I agree, but I don't think any of them were significant entropy
> > > > contributors before: things like nvme have always been outside
> > > > of
> > > > this and sr and st don't really contribute much to the seek
> > > > load
> > > > during boot because they're probed but not used by the boot
> > > > sequence, so I can't see how they would cause this
> > > > behaviour.  I
> > > > suppose it could be target probing, but even that seems
> > > > unlikely
> > > > because it should be dwarfed by the number of root disk reads
> > > > during boot.
> > > > 
> > > > For the rng to take an additional 5 minutes to initialize, we
> > > > must
> > > > have lost a significant entropy source somewhere.
> > > 
> > > I agree it's not a significant amount of entropy, but even just
> > > one
> > > bit could mean a long stall if that put us over the edge of just
> > > not
> > > having enough for whatever is blocking on /dev/random. Mikael's
> > > boot
> > > did have a CDROM, it's not impossible that the handful of
> > > commands we
> > > end up doing to that device would have contributed enough entropy
> > > to
> > > get the boot done without stalling for minutes.
> > > 
> > > One way to know for sure, and that's if Mikael tests the patch.
> > 
> > I think I've got the root cause.  I have one system in my test bed
> > exhibiting this behaviour.  It turns out the disk in it has no
> > characteristics VPD page.  The 0xB1 VPD was a SBC-3 addition, so
> > that's
> > not surprising.  However, the characteristics check bails before
> > setting the flags, so it takes the default flag which has flipped.
> > 
> > We can either fix this by setting the QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM if
> > there's
> > no 0xB1 page or by setting the default as Jens proposed.
> 
> I'd recommend just doing my patch, since that'll be the same behavior
> that SCSI had before.

I've got the history now, it's this patch

Author: Xuewei Zhang <xueweiz@google.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 6 13:37:19 2018 -0700

    scsi: sd: Contribute to randomness when running rotational device

It added the else branch to the if (rot == 1).  It's the position of
that else branch which is wrong because not all disks have a SBC-3
characteristics VPD page, so they're the ones under MQ which stop
contributing entropy.  Whichever patch we go with will need a fixes:
for this.

James


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-12 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-09 17:04 [5.0-rc5 regression] "scsi: kill off the legacy IO path" causes 5 minute delay during boot on Sun Blade 2500 Mikael Pettersson
2019-02-09 18:19 ` James Bottomley
2019-02-10  9:17   ` Mikael Pettersson
2019-02-10 15:44     ` James Bottomley
2019-02-10 16:05       ` Jens Axboe
2019-02-10 16:25         ` James Bottomley
2019-02-10 16:35           ` Jens Axboe
2019-02-11 15:25             ` James Bottomley
2019-02-11 15:28               ` Jens Axboe
2019-02-11 15:42                 ` James Bottomley
2019-02-11 15:46                   ` Jens Axboe
2019-02-11 16:28                     ` James Bottomley
2019-02-11 16:31                       ` Jens Axboe
2019-02-12  2:13                         ` James Bottomley
2019-02-12  2:50                           ` Jens Axboe
2019-02-12  3:37                             ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2019-02-12  4:15                               ` James Bottomley
2019-02-12 15:24                             ` James Bottomley [this message]
2019-02-12 15:27                               ` Jens Axboe
2019-02-14 18:35         ` Mikael Pettersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1549985049.3173.3.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpelinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xueweiz@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).