linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, axboe@fb.com
Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] block: force an unlimited segment size on queues with a virt boundary
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:48:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1563896932.3609.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190521070143.22631-3-hch@lst.de>

On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 09:01 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We currently fail to update the front/back segment size in the bio
> when
> deciding to allow an otherwise gappy segement to a device with a
> virt boundary.  The reason why this did not cause problems is that
> devices with a virt boundary fundamentally don't use segments as we
> know it and thus don't care.  Make that assumption formal by forcing
> an unlimited segement size in this case.
> 
> Fixes: f6970f83ef79 ("block: don't check if adjacent bvecs in one bio
> can be mergeable")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-settings.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index 3facc41476be..2ae348c101a0 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -310,6 +310,9 @@ void blk_queue_max_segment_size(struct
> request_queue *q, unsigned int max_size)
>  		       __func__, max_size);
>  	}
>  
> +	/* see blk_queue_virt_boundary() for the explanation */
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(q->limits.virt_boundary_mask);
> +
>  	q->limits.max_segment_size = max_size;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_segment_size);
> @@ -742,6 +745,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_segment_boundary);
>  void blk_queue_virt_boundary(struct request_queue *q, unsigned long
> mask)
>  {
>  	q->limits.virt_boundary_mask = mask;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Devices that require a virtual boundary do not support
> scatter/gather
> +	 * I/O natively, but instead require a descriptor list entry
> for each
> +	 * page (which might not be idential to the Linux
> PAGE_SIZE).  Because
> +	 * of that they are not limited by our notion of "segment
> size".
> +	 */
> +	q->limits.max_segment_size = UINT_MAX;

This needs to be conditional.  If you did set the max segment size, the
block layer should still respect it and not do an override here.  This
seems to be what's causing a regression in SCSI because we set the
max_segment_size first then call the blk_queue_virt_boundary. 
Additionally, if you're not setting the virt boundary (mask == 0) this
should not be set.  I suggest the below.

James

---
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 2ae348c101a0..46a95536f3bd 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -752,7 +752,8 @@ void blk_queue_virt_boundary(struct request_queue *q, unsigned long mask)
 	 * page (which might not be idential to the Linux PAGE_SIZE).  Because
 	 * of that they are not limited by our notion of "segment size".
 	 */
-	q->limits.max_segment_size = UINT_MAX;
+	if (mask != 0 && q->limits.max_segment_size == BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE)
+		q->limits.max_segment_size = UINT_MAX;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_virt_boundary);
 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-23 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-21  7:01 fix nr_phys_segments vs iterators accounting v3 Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-21  7:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: don't decrement nr_phys_segments for physically contigous segments Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-21  8:05   ` Ming Lei
2019-05-21  7:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: force an unlimited segment size on queues with a virt boundary Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 15:48   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2019-07-23 16:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-21  7:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: remove the segment size check in bio_will_gap Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-21  7:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: remove the bi_seg_{front,back}_size fields in struct bio Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-21  8:06   ` Ming Lei
2019-05-21 12:47 ` fix nr_phys_segments vs iterators accounting v3 Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-05-16  8:40 fix nr_phys_segments vs iterators accounting v2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-16  8:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: force an unlimited segment size on queues with a virt boundary Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-16  8:49   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1563896932.3609.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).