linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	<ming.lei@redhat.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v3 01/13] blk-mq: Change rqs check in blk_mq_free_rqs()
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 23:12:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1631545950-56586-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1631545950-56586-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>

The original code in commit 24d2f90309b23 ("blk-mq: split out tag
initialization, support shared tags") would check tags->rqs is non-NULL and
then dereference tags->rqs[].

Then in commit 2af8cbe30531 ("blk-mq: split tag ->rqs[] into two"), we
started to dereference tags->static_rqs[], but continued to check non-NULL
tags->rqs.

Check tags->static_rqs as non-NULL instead, which is more logical.

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 108a352051be..2316ff27c1f5 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2340,7 +2340,7 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
 {
 	struct page *page;
 
-	if (tags->rqs && set->ops->exit_request) {
+	if (tags->static_rqs && set->ops->exit_request) {
 		int i;
 
 		for (i = 0; i < tags->nr_tags; i++) {
-- 
2.26.2


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-13 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-13 15:12 [PATCH RESEND v3 00/13] blk-mq: Reduce static requests memory footprint for shared sbitmap John Garry
2021-09-13 15:12 ` John Garry [this message]
2021-09-14  5:35   ` [PATCH RESEND v3 01/13] blk-mq: Change rqs check in blk_mq_free_rqs() Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 02/13] block: Rename BLKDEV_MAX_RQ -> BLKDEV_DEFAULT_RQ John Garry
2021-09-14  5:36   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 03/13] blk-mq: Relocate shared sbitmap resize in blk_mq_update_nr_requests() John Garry
2021-09-14  5:37   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 04/13] blk-mq: Invert check " John Garry
2021-09-14  5:38   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 05/13] blk-mq-sched: Rename blk_mq_sched_alloc_{tags -> map_and_rqs}() John Garry
2021-09-14  5:40   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-14  8:10     ` John Garry
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 06/13] blk-mq-sched: Rename blk_mq_sched_free_{requests -> rqs}() John Garry
2021-09-14  5:41   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 07/13] blk-mq: Pass driver tags to blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping() John Garry
2021-09-14  5:44   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 08/13] blk-mq: Don't clear driver tags own mapping John Garry
2021-09-14  5:45   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 09/13] blk-mq: Add blk_mq_tag_update_sched_shared_sbitmap() John Garry
2021-09-14  5:46   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 10/13] blk-mq: Add blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs() John Garry
2021-09-14  5:48   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 11/13] blk-mq: Refactor and rename blk_mq_free_map_and_{requests->rqs}() John Garry
2021-09-14  5:50   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 12/13] blk-mq: Use shared tags for shared sbitmap support John Garry
2021-09-14  6:04   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-14  8:27     ` John Garry
2021-09-13 15:12 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 13/13] blk-mq: Stop using pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags John Garry
2021-09-14  6:05   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-20  7:45 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 00/13] blk-mq: Reduce static requests memory footprint for shared sbitmap John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1631545950-56586-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).