From: Wang Shanker <shankerwangmiao@gmail.com> To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Bug Report] Discard bios cannot be correctly merged in blk-mq Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:40:27 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1C6DB607-B7BE-4257-8384-427BB490C9C0@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YMAOO3XjOUl2IG+4@T590> > 2021年06月09日 08:41,Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> 写道: > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 11:49:04PM +0800, Wang Shanker wrote: >> >> >> Actually, what are received by the nvme controller are discard requests >> with 128 segments of 4k, instead of one segment of 512k. > > Right, I am just wondering if this way makes a difference wrt. single > range/segment discard request from device viewpoint, but anyway it is > better to send less segment. It would be meaningful if more than queue_max_discard_segments() bio's are sent and merged into big segments. > >> >>> >>>> >>>> Similarly, the problem with scsi devices can be emulated using the following >>>> options for qemu: >>>> >>>> -device virtio-scsi,id=scsi \ >>>> -device scsi-hd,drive=nvme1,bus=scsi.0,logical_block_size=4096,discard_granularity=2097152,physical_block_size=4096,serial=NVME1 \ >>>> -device scsi-hd,drive=nvme2,bus=scsi.0,logical_block_size=4096,discard_granularity=2097152,physical_block_size=4096,serial=NVME2 \ >>>> -device scsi-hd,drive=nvme3,bus=scsi.0,logical_block_size=4096,discard_granularity=2097152,physical_block_size=4096,serial=NVME3 \ >>>> -trace scsi_disk_emulate_command_UNMAP,file=scsitrace.log >>>> >>>> >>>> Despite the discovery, I cannot come up with a proper fix of this issue due >>>> to my lack of familiarity of the block subsystem. I expect your kind feedback >>>> on this. Thanks in advance. >>> >>> In the above setting and raid456 test, I observe that rq->nr_phys_segments can >>> reach 128, but queue_max_discard_segments() reports 256. So discard >>> request size can be 512KB, which is the max size when you run 1MB discard on >>> raid456. However, if the discard length on raid456 is increased, the >>> current way will become inefficient. >> >> Exactly. >> >> I suggest that bio's can be merged and be calculated as one segment if they are >> contiguous and contain no data. > > Fine. > >> >> And I also discovered later that, even normal long write requests, e.g. >> a 10m write, will be split into 4k bio's. The maximum number of bio's which can >> be merged into one request is limited by queue_max_segments, regardless >> of whether those bio's are contiguous. In my test environment, for scsi devices, >> queue_max_segments can be 254, which means about 1m size of requests. For nvme >> devices(e.g. Intel DC P4610), queue_max_segments is only 33 since their mdts is 5, >> which results in only 132k of requests. > > Here what matters is queue_max_discard_segments(). Here I was considering normal write/read bio's, since I first took it for granted that normal write/read IOs would be optimal in raid456, and finally discovered that those 4k IOs can only be merged into not-so-big requests. > >> >> So, I would also suggest that raid456 should be improved to issue bigger bio's to >> underlying drives. > > Right, that should be root solution. > > Cc Xiao, I remembered that he worked on this area. Many thanks for looking into this issue. Cheers, Miao Wang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-09 2:41 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-05 20:54 Wang Shanker 2021-06-05 22:38 ` antlists 2021-06-06 3:44 ` Wang Shanker 2021-06-07 13:07 ` Ming Lei 2021-06-08 15:49 ` Wang Shanker 2021-06-09 0:41 ` Ming Lei 2021-06-09 2:40 ` Wang Shanker [this message] 2021-06-09 8:44 ` Xiao Ni 2021-06-09 9:03 ` Wang Shanker 2021-06-18 6:28 ` Wang Shanker 2021-06-18 12:49 ` Xiao Ni 2021-06-21 7:49 ` Wang Shanker 2021-06-22 1:48 ` Xiao Ni
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1C6DB607-B7BE-4257-8384-427BB490C9C0@gmail.com \ --to=shankerwangmiao@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \ --cc=xni@redhat.com \ --subject='Re: [Bug Report] Discard bios cannot be correctly merged in blk-mq' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).