From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35915C4CECD for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098AD20665 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="uzU2VkkD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728065AbfIPPHh (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:07:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:37621 "EHLO mail-wr1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728364AbfIPPHe (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:07:34 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id i1so38707227wro.4 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:07:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YZ7GwPwdP1QaRAGCDi3zfIX/FY2fDnM1sr/RMCpFxxc=; b=uzU2VkkDYVjQ1pTRUBOHpiQDlJuYycViFdnM2TZTPwRbR0+hs72PASEsad5ldWEHha 6YwaULFVAh7vUXhyKLVU4sJUP6XgqbItTQN7+FQTGReXDU2nwmRrbDpsB33iZTaXfZGk /hyPUmC/1qHE/rSCxaVCgMuXBV/n0z9PuGGdu+OT8RtWn9xp9ARUADYcSUaN5+uA2Qz4 70Ayj4BJshAmRS0FoLOw089B9rb8FHgGNjnB/B8f2J+ETsc3GQ67QTYCeTwtx0jElo+A qPMiqIBOdgda4xvjbBXhUbZHs1l/yrfqqUa7pD7EzbcMiUBo6s4KET/EDASXzqS0G1S5 ceyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YZ7GwPwdP1QaRAGCDi3zfIX/FY2fDnM1sr/RMCpFxxc=; b=gQFt4rTjOAt0TOFZzl6TmEsi2mQG0I8xBIhtfjJbzzf5oiQIK8TyHOvxwGFV6q2yul QnHnnFuYIuizohEBahyfWaldYF3JZvbMPWMltBcEShGYQa4YkHKqr2cFzeT3OhvjRv2h bn9fDvwnuXkbiQ+Jek7FiQTWPrpqXnTDIvy7He4ls34PmiIHz4ZoSM++pKkXHJsQ9TCD yi/fjFWiV2IsGZjEDxm0QlwQbpqwoAiReDcfxTYYpZVJtSQqe0LRxSsVNw5cWOfzspA3 2q+3q1etK44QHX0J0RlCpWO20PDLlqTuwlFgnWi33Ly+qdK96P+P9ePGhFv1+AMbWqzw sYhw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX2xt0flEgPjF/DNtlIXRS3hWUlWm1bzqwUhVsdvGX95/gw8D08 utrO8K0EkvOdt8I+I/TydF6sUQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwA6CN0baTI+QTv0trp9VIfjDxVv1LIVPFLl9Of0S+VCIenW7uhYJSYtsse4eqn443IXckKPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4689:: with SMTP id u9mr226479wrq.78.1568646451810; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (146-241-102-115.dyn.eolo.it. [146.241.102.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 26sm113150wmf.20.2019.09.16.08.07.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] block, bfq: remove bfq prefix from cgroups filenames From: Paolo Valente In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:07:29 +0200 Cc: linux-block , linux-kernel , Ulf Hansson , Linus Walleij , noreply-spamdigest via bfq-iosched , Oleksandr Natalenko , cgroups@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1F3898DA-C61F-4FA7-B586-F0FA0CAF5069@linaro.org> References: <20190909073117.20625-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <80C56C11-DA21-4036-9006-2F459ACE9A8C@linaro.org> To: Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org > Il giorno 16 set 2019, alle ore 17:01, Jens Axboe ha = scritto: >=20 > On 9/16/19 8:56 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: >> News of this change? Can we have it (or the solution with the >> symlinks if you prefer it) for 5.4? >=20 > Coordinate with Tejun and bundle the stuff we need into a series, Ok. Tejun, could you put your switch-off-io-cost code into a standalone patch, so that I can put it together with this one in a complete series? Thanks, Paolo > we > can definitely put that in 5.4. I did send out the initial pull = request > for block, but I've got a few things lined up for a secondary pull > later this week. >=20 > --=20 > Jens Axboe >=20