From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: v4.20-rc6: Sporadic use-after-free in bt_iter()
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 20:17:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ca5cd37-87ce-8cff-6cb4-1fdb29bd4da2@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1545265001.185366.496.camel@acm.org>
On 12/19/18 5:16 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 16:27 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 12/19/18 4:24 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> If I run the srp blktests in a loop then I see the below call stack appearing
>>> sporadically. I have not yet had the time to analyze this but I'm reporting
>>> this here in case someone else would already have had a look at this.
>>>
>>> Bart.
>>>
>>> ==================================================================
>>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bt_iter+0x86/0xf0
>>> Read of size 8 at addr ffff88803b335240 by task fio/21412
>>>
>>> CPU: 0 PID: 21412 Comm: fio Tainted: G W 4.20.0-rc6-dbg+ #3
>>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
>>> Call Trace:
>>> dump_stack+0x86/0xca
>>> print_address_description+0x71/0x239
>>> kasan_report.cold.5+0x242/0x301
>>> __asan_load8+0x54/0x90
>>> bt_iter+0x86/0xf0
>>> blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x373/0x5e0
>>> blk_mq_in_flight+0x96/0xb0
>>> part_in_flight+0x40/0x140
>>> part_round_stats+0x18e/0x370
>>> blk_account_io_start+0x3d7/0x670
>>> blk_mq_bio_to_request+0x19c/0x3a0
>>> blk_mq_make_request+0x7a9/0xcb0
>>> generic_make_request+0x41d/0x960
>>> submit_bio+0x9b/0x250
>>> do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x435c/0x4c70
>>> __blockdev_direct_IO+0x79/0x88
>>> ext4_direct_IO+0x46c/0xc00
>>> generic_file_direct_write+0x119/0x210
>>> __generic_file_write_iter+0x11c/0x280
>>> ext4_file_write_iter+0x1b8/0x6f0
>>> aio_write+0x204/0x310
>>> io_submit_one+0x9d3/0xe80
>>> __x64_sys_io_submit+0x115/0x340
>>> do_syscall_64+0x71/0x210
>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>>> RIP: 0033:0x7f02cf043219
>>
>> I've seen this one before as well, it's not a new thing. As far as I can
>> tell, it's a false positive. There should be no possibility for a
>> use-after-free iterating the static tags/requests.
>
> Are you sure this is a false positive?
No I'm not, but the few times I have seen it, I haven't been able to
make much sense of it. It goes back quite a bit.
I have not yet encountered any false
> positive KASAN complaints. According to the following gdb output this complaint
> refers to reading rq->q:
>
> (gdb) list *(bt_iter+0x86)
> 0xffffffff816b9346 is in bt_iter (block/blk-mq-tag.c:237).
> 232
> 233 /*
> 234 * We can hit rq == NULL here, because the tagging functions
> 235 * test and set the bit before assigning ->rqs[].
> 236 */
> 237 if (rq && rq->q == hctx->queue)
> 238 iter_data->fn(hctx, rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
> 239 return true;
> 240 }
> 241
>
> From the disassembly output:
>
> 232
> 233 /*
> 234 * We can hit rq == NULL here, because the tagging functions
> 235 * test and set the bit before assigning ->rqs[].
> 236 */
> 237 if (rq && rq->q == hctx->queue)
> 0xffffffff816b9339 <+121>: test %r12,%r12
> 0xffffffff816b933c <+124>: je 0xffffffff816b935f <bt_iter+159>
> 0xffffffff816b933e <+126>: mov %r12,%rdi
> 0xffffffff816b9341 <+129>: callq 0xffffffff813bd3e0 <__asan_load8>
> 0xffffffff816b9346 <+134>: lea 0x138(%r13),%rdi
> 0xffffffff816b934d <+141>: mov (%r12),%r14
> 0xffffffff816b9351 <+145>: callq 0xffffffff813bd3e0 <__asan_load8>
> 0xffffffff816b9356 <+150>: cmp 0x138(%r13),%r14
> 0xffffffff816b935d <+157>: je 0xffffffff816b936f <bt_iter+175>
>
> BTW, rq may but does not have to refer to tags->static_rqs[...]. It may also
> refer to hctx->fq.flush_rq.
But even those are persistent for the lifetime of the queue... But since
kasan complains it belongs to a specific page, I'm guessing it's one
of the regular requests since those are out of a chopped up page. Which
means it makes even less sense.
Is this happening while devices are being actively torn down? And
are you using shared tags? That's the only way I could see this
triggering.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-20 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-19 23:24 v4.20-rc6: Sporadic use-after-free in bt_iter() Bart Van Assche
2018-12-19 23:27 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 0:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-20 3:17 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-12-20 3:24 ` jianchao.wang
2018-12-20 4:19 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 4:32 ` jianchao.wang
2018-12-20 4:48 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 5:03 ` jianchao.wang
2018-12-20 13:02 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 13:07 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 18:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-20 18:21 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 18:33 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 20:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-20 21:00 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 21:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-20 21:26 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 21:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-20 21:34 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 21:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-20 21:44 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 21:48 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 22:19 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-12-20 22:23 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 22:33 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 22:47 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-20 22:50 ` Jens Axboe
2019-02-14 23:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-15 18:29 ` Evan Green
2019-02-19 16:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-21 20:54 ` Evan Green
2019-02-15 2:57 ` jianchao.wang
2018-12-20 4:06 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ca5cd37-87ce-8cff-6cb4-1fdb29bd4da2@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).