linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Linux-Kernal <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@gmail.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, kbuild-all@01.org,
	Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH V2 16/16] block, bfq: split bfq-iosched.c into multiple source files
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:39:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170412083948.GF31394@yexl-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C9AEA3F6-14A1-4D81-A33C-1C38FD1E1F45@linaro.org>

On 04/11, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>> Il giorno 02 apr 2017, alle ore 12:02, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> ha scritto:
>> 
>> Hi Paolo,
>> 
>> [auto build test ERROR on block/for-next]
>> [also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc4 next-20170331]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>> 
>
>Hi,
>this seems to be a false positive.  Build is correct with the tested
>tree and the .config.
>

Hmm, this error is reproducible in 0day side, and you patches were applied on
top of 803e16d "Merge branch 'for-4.12/block' into for-next", is it the same as
yours?

Thanks,
Xiaolong

>Thanks,
>Paolo
>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Paolo-Valente/block-bfq-introduce-the-BFQ-v0-I-O-scheduler-as-an-extra-scheduler/20170402-100622
>> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next
>> config: i386-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
>> reproduce:
>>        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>        make ARCH=i386 
>> 
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> 
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_mark_bfqq_busy" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfqg_stats_update_dequeue" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_clear_bfqq_busy" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_clear_bfqq_non_blocking_wait_rq" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_bfqq_non_blocking_wait_rq" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_clear_bfqq_wait_request" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_timeout" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfqg_stats_set_start_empty_time" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_weights_tree_add" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_put_queue" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_bfqq_sync" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfqg_to_blkg" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfqq_group" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_weights_tree_remove" [block/bfq-wf2q.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_bic_update_cgroup" [block/bfq-iosched.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfqg_stats_set_start_idle_time" [block/bfq-iosched.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfqg_stats_update_completion" [block/bfq-iosched.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfq_bfqq_move" [block/bfq-iosched.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "bfqg_put" [block/bfq-iosched.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "next_queue_may_preempt" [block/bfq-iosched.ko] undefined!
>> 
>> ---
>> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
>> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
>> <.config.gz>
>
>_______________________________________________
>kbuild-all mailing list
>kbuild-all@lists.01.org
>https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-12  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-31 12:47 [PATCH V2 00/16] Introduce the BFQ I/O scheduler Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 01/16] block, bfq: introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 02/16] block, bfq: add full hierarchical scheduling and cgroups support Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 03/16] block, bfq: improve throughput boosting Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 04/16] block, bfq: modify the peak-rate estimator Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 15:31   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-04 10:42     ` Paolo Valente
2017-04-04 15:28       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-06 19:37         ` Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 05/16] block, bfq: add more fairness with writes and slow processes Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 06/16] block, bfq: improve responsiveness Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 07/16] block, bfq: reduce I/O latency for soft real-time applications Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 08/16] block, bfq: preserve a low latency also with NCQ-capable drives Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 09/16] block, bfq: reduce latency during request-pool saturation Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 10/16] block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM) Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 11/16] block, bfq: reduce idling only in symmetric scenarios Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 15:20   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-07  7:47     ` Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 12/16] block, bfq: boost the throughput on NCQ-capable flash-based devices Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 13/16] block, bfq: boost the throughput with random I/O on NCQ-capable HDDs Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 14/16] block, bfq: handle bursts of queue activations Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 15/16] block, bfq: remove all get and put of I/O contexts Paolo Valente
2017-03-31 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 16/16] block, bfq: split bfq-iosched.c into multiple source files Paolo Valente
2017-04-02 10:02   ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-11 11:00     ` Paolo Valente
2017-04-12  8:39       ` Ye Xiaolong [this message]
2017-04-12  9:24         ` [kbuild-all] " Paolo Valente
2017-04-12 16:05           ` Paolo Valente
2017-04-10 16:56 ` [PATCH V2 00/16] Introduce the BFQ I/O scheduler Bart Van Assche
2017-04-11  8:43   ` Paolo Valente

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170412083948.GF31394@yexl-desktop \
    --to=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).